what went wrong? is miyazaki a hack?
And the shit-posting continues.
>>333151087
Yes
Based B-team
The pc version of ds3 will be 93+
Screencap this
>>333151087
It's not the same reviewers, therefore these reviews lack consistency and reliability.
>>333151087
>Dark Souls 3 is 1/100 worse than Dark Souls 2
>what went wrong?
Kill yourself
>>333151346
people were spamming this board for years how shit ds2 is so ds3 has to be even more aweful.
>>333151346
*Dark soul 1
>>333151087
I have to thank you my friend, you just reminded me to add "Miyazaki" to the filtered words.
>A) lol metacritic scores
>B) a point difference.of 1-3 is now the difference between amazing and terrible?
>C) Maybe people are just tired of the same old Souls formula, DaS2 and BB both sold like crap, maybe it's time to retire the series/genre
>>333151209
It's at an 89%.
Eurogamer said it was the best since DS1
>>333151389
There's a pattern.
Dark Souls 1: Great
Dark Souls 2: Shit
Bloodborne: Great
Dark Souls 3: Shit
So whatever comes next is good.
>>333151404
no problem
>>333151603
What about Demon Souls?
>>333151087
Miyazaki didn't work on DS3, it was the B-Team
Why would you trust metacritic scores in the first place
>>333151087
>is miyazaki a hack?
nope, the big story here is that reviewers are casuals who just want to go with the flow. they made a booboo with DaS 2, thry rode the wrong wave.
>>333151829
are you sure? he shows up in the credits.
>>333151905
He did work on DS3.
The one you quoted is just a memer.
>>333151603
No it goes
Demon's:Good
Dark Souls: Shit
Dark Souls 2: Shit
Bloodborne: Good
Slashy Souls: Shit
Dark Souls 3: Shit
>>333151087
Miyazaki made Bloodborne which I might remind you has a 92 on metacritic, so....
>>333151829
>Miyazaki didn't work on DS3, it was the B-Team
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S0HznBnrCE
>>333151873
Pretty good score for a half-finished game.
>>333151087
BASED B-TEAM
A-TEAM BTFO
>>333151991
>Demon's
>good
Couldn't even finish it, that's how boring it was.
>>333151087
Reviewers are fags. case closed
One reviewer said it was worse than ds2 because sometimes enemies would flip around and hit you, implying this wasn't previously a problem with ds2.
Also some other fag said the game had too many one hit kill enemies which sounds like a fucking horrible build.
All these reviewers are still immature kids who wouldn't dare say 'i didn't enjoy this' because than counterfags show up saying shit like 'you just didn't like it becuz it's too hXc for you.
>>333151991
Dark is better than Demon's.
>>333151443
It's not out yet
DaS = DaS3 > BB > DeS > DaS2
>>333152403
/thread
>>333152403
critics say otherwise
>>333151991
>dark souls was shit
come on bud. I didn't like the game either but there was no way it was 'shit'
especially if you fucking thought bloodborne was good in comparison. that just signals you're a fucking idiot.
>>333151209
Ain't PC Scores typically lower? Because of the higher standards?
>>333154432
I rather play a 89 scored game at 60 fps than one with 92 at a lower than 30fps 2bh
I don't notice a difference of 3 points but a difference of 30 is just too much.
>>333154416
It seems like you don't own a PS4
>>333154416
Stay mad, PCuck :^)
