I love how nintendo simply KNOWS what their fans want.
These past 8 years, they've been giving us masterpiece after masterpiece.
God bless.
The only ones remaining that didn't went full 3rd party dudebro machines.
>>332976721
Well I want to play it.
>>332976995
>PM and TTYD had good gameplay
>SPM had good story
>SS and all future paper mario games have neither
>>332976721
Has any other company ever missed the point of what people liked about a game franchise this hard?
>>332977507
We almost had some good gameplay again, it wasn't meant to be though.
>>332977525
Nintendo outdo themselves with every modern installment in X franchise.
>>332977853
>We were going to have a chain chomp ally
That alone would have made it worth.
>>332977853
I love people shilling this image as if it was any different. Battling was exactly the same. You still needed stickers to attack. They removed partners because they conflicted with that.
What other games are out there that have gorgeous visuals but utterly shit everwhere else?
>>332979928
crysis?
>>332979312
I said some good gameplay, I know the sticker mechanic was still there but the chain chomp partner is still better than what we got. Also there is the card place & King Mole boss which is more interesting. I wish we had a beta leak of some form so we could see how it would've played better, at least to let us know if you can choose who to attack first instead of it being the first opponent.
>>332980109
>I know the sticker mechanic was still there but the chain chomp partner is still better than what we got.
You're only saying that because it's familiar.
SS had a billion problems, and partners would have solved none of them.
>>332979928
Bioshock Infinite?
>>332980896
I never said it would've solved any of SS's issues it just worked in the past and it's something most of us want/wanted so I and I'm pretty sure a lot of others would've liked it.
