ITT: TECHNOLOGY
>>332801895
what the fuck is he shooting? super hot BB pellets?
yeah no, this is retarded TECHNOLOGY. this game sucks and nothing can redeem it
>>332802181
wow, what's in those trash bags? cotton balls?
>>332801895
>no penetration
More like anti-technology
>decal is considered technology now by plebs
welcome to fucking return to wolfenstein
>>332802106
*tips*
>>332802283
I agree, this is shit
>>332802181
>foot clipping through the bags
Christ, even skyrim had that technology
>>332801895
>Bates
how fitting
>>332801895
OH MAN, BULLET DECALS?! I've never seen that before ever. Actually, I mean, what are "bullet decals?" I don't know what that phrase means since I've never seen them before.
>>332802106
>>332802283
>>332802284
>>332802321
>>332802550
>>332802593
Post some TECHNOLOGY then
some eye tech
>>332803301
almost every 3D rig have that shit, that's not technology, just good animation
>>332802463
HOW?
>>332802463
Yeah, how?
>>332803473
This one is awesome.
>>332803473
we have come so far
;_;
>>332803743
My cock in your mouth is awesome, this is just a simple delay
>>332803895
You're dumb
>>332803473
I don't get but this is not how light works.
>>332803895
>My cock in your mouth is awesome
Maybe someday technology will progress so far that you may actually get to finally put your cock in someone's mouth. :)
>>332802463
>rss
my nigga, love that fucking game
Anyone have a webm/gif of how flip flops in GTAV work like real life flip flops?
>>332804053
Uhhh, yes it does.
>>332802463
You sly minx.
>>332801895
>>332802550
Its a 1:1 scale of Manhattan for Christ's sake. Every street sign is supposed to be destroyable?
>>332802463
Oh shit this is my fetish. What game?
>>332803473
Pretty nice I guess but it's just a trigger I'm pretty sure and not real GI. It also looks like shit I think and "reflects" way too much of the color. I'm sure the people at Naughty Dog were patting themselves on the back for this one though.
>>332803473
Where's the technology?
>>332804604
If you're going to do something, do it right.
The Division is a blatant and low quality cash grab.
>>332804950
So much math
>>332803473
It took me a second
Nice
>>332804950
what gaem?
Also floor doesn't melt.
>>332804950
Beautiful. What game?
>>332804986
mozaic walls reflect orange and blue light
>>332804950
It's prebaked
>>332803473
Halo 3 did this.
>>332804950
prebaked and looks like shit
>>332804382
gilda pls
>>332805359
>>332805438
Every technology is """prebaked"""""
>>332805129
>>332805193
Killzone Shadowfall
>floors don't melt
They are probably made of better material then some container object
>>332806392
""""""""""""""""""""""""""HENRY"""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>332804939
It doesn't matter how the effect was achieved anon, the effect is the same. Are you also mad that every game doesn't use some kinda physical simulation for lighting like ray tracing?
>>332805359
Prebaked is such a retarded word used by idiots who know nothing. Every rasterized graphics technology is a """prebaked""" trick. Why does it bother you how they achieved it?
>>332807412
I'm just pointing out that it's a cheap trigger before people start getting on Naughty Dog's dick saying they're programming gods since that seems common these days. Fuck, someone made a thread praising UC4 for having water that reacts to objects dropped in it. It's cool, definitely, though I think it doesn't look very good still, but technology threads go way out of control with people claiming things are happening that aren't actually happening.
>>332803473
Battlefield 3 did this, except better.
>>332807703
but it is happening. Are you aware of how "real" GI is actually achieved? Their graphics programmers must be pretty fucking great to emulate it like this with old fashioned per-pixel lighting desu, and they deserve praise for it. Besides that, yes other developers could do it but do they? Same with the water effects you mentioned. There's nothing wrong with praising developers who do cool stuff despite limitations.
>>332808018
Post it
>>332804382
Why do shitty games have some pretty fucking amazing and legit groundbreaking technology?
>>332807703
it would be easier to program actual GI, the problem is there's no hardware that could run it. You don't know dick.
>>332808575
again, it's not technology, but animation
>>332808710
You're a retard.
>>332808710
Go fuck yourself faggot. Rockstar is the god of TECHNOLOGY.
>>332802463
Is spending a whole minute cutting it out viable in a match?
>>332808764
no u
>>332808030
I don't know exactly how it's done in TLOU but I'm guessing it's a simple trigger that causes either a colored light to be shined or some other method of coloring the surface. That's somewhat how real GI works, but in actual GI the light actually dependent on where and how the original light is being shined. It doesn't look that good in TLOU since it seems it's like an area (or screen space) effect that doesn't take anything into consideration at all and just lights up a certain space when light is shined on the wall.
Though I guess most TECHNOLOGY is posted based on being attention to detail rather than being impressive in its own right so I guess it still fits. I still don't want people going off on tirades and shit based on not understanding what's happening and that happens a lot in these and similar graphics related threads.
>>332808652
>it would be easier to program actual GI, the problem is there's no hardware that could run it
I know. It's a hacked in approximation though like I said above I guess it fits the thread since TECHNOLOGY is more about attention to detail than anything. I'm just salty that nobody is bothering to try and make a game with full functioning GI or path tracing and there probably won't be one until consoles can do it since they run the fucking tech advancement in the industry now. Gonna be another decade or more probably.
>>332802463
>bottom of garage door glued to the ground
At least they tried.
>>332808863
If the enemy is being tricky dicky and not making moves, yes.
>>332808973
nobody COULD make a game with full functioning GI. A simple hack achieves the same effect so why would we bother trying to write a million new algorithms to work out how to do GI without raycasting? Do you think dynamic shadows in games are a cheap hack as well? I don't understand your point.
And it has nothing to do with consoles. Have you ever tried to write a ray tracer? I have. You can run it on the most top of the line consumer GPU out there and the MOST you're gonna get in ideal circumstances is 1 frame per second. Wolfenstein: Ray traced achieved around 24 with 4 prototype intel cards that were never meant for any kind of consumer usage and that's a game with assets from 2009. This has nothing to do with consoles.
I'm tired of PCMR shitheads who have never developed shit in their lives saying consoles are "holding back the industry" without realising that games would have to be developed for lowest common denominator hardware in all ecosystems, whether that be consoles or toasters.
>>332806873
>not getting blitz to put a charge on the door
>>332808973
>going off on tirades and shit based on not understanding
like you're doing now?
>>332802858
FEAR's grendades were infinitely more impressive
and that game came out a decade ago. video games have been dead for a long time now
>>332802106
The bullets were going way faster than 25 mph, so I'd say it's pretty fantastic technology. It's a speed limit so the sign stopped the bullets because they were going too fast.
>>332811150
what a waste
>>332802463
Ok now, THAT, is impressive
>>332808863
I'd imagine that if you got the entire team to do it it might be viable
>>332802463
>all the noobs not knowing the game
its like you dont even try
>>332804869
RAINBOW SIX SIEGE
>>332802858
Wow, that looks terrible, all of those pre placed holes popping up, nothing dynamic about that.
>>332814236
its funny because it ISNT pre placed.
they are completely random and explosion wise it is very realistic.
of course, lethality radius is not quite realistic, but that would be OP anyway.
yet, the holes are different every time due to fragmentation, dude.
>>332814236
Here's your (you), Luke
