>blizzdrones will defend this
nice fuckin rng lore, reminder that legion will fail also
>>332674903
I can't wait for him to restore 1 health on a 3/2, and not 8 on me.
Hearthstone is a game inside of WoW. It has no lore itself.
I wonder if there will be more "good guy" versions of evil dudes in wow lore in the new expac. I also want to hear the voiced lines of the new rag.
Why Ragnaros is lightlord? He was firelord
>>332675956
>what is Holy Fire
>>332675413
No implication that the effect is random. We will see.
>>332675956
This expac is showing a lot of "corrupted" versions of legendaries and other hearthstone cards. Some of them feature bad guys turning good. Definitely a "what if" take on WoW lore. I'd say I like it.
>>332676043
It is most definitely random. The implication is in literally every other RNG card's wording in the game.
>>332675857
LIVE, INSECT!
>>332676097
Damn so this is the closest we are getting to an unhinged hearthstone?
Dayum shame
>>332676043
The effect is definitely random. The dev team has never let you choose anything during EoT or SoT effects.
>>332675413
Who the hell runs 3/2's and this card in the same deck, at the same time? Also, who the hell, except a complete idiot, doesn't try to set up a big heal at the end of their turn?
>>332676191
It's the cloest we'll ever get to a "Time Spiral" set, I'd say. I still want more "fun" cards that don't affect gameplay, like a mech that changes the background music at the end of each turn.
>>332676097
>Corruption works both ways
>>332676461
When you corrupt something that's already corrupt, it's like multiplying a negative by a negative.
>>332674903
It's a "what if" expansion. It's not canon.
>>332676830
Nothing in hearthstone is Canon.
Hearthstone is a game inside a game.
>>332676961
That too.
>>332676961
Who prints Hearthstone cards in the WoW universe?
>>332677301
a fat, smelly dwarf called metzen the innkeeper