Hello /v/, I'm here today to ask you one simple question.
Set aside your sexual preference for a moment and try to picture yourself in every person's shoes.
Which one of these photos do you believe is more sexualised?
Her ass is eating that belt strap
>>332403557
I guarantee if you looked a little harder you could find a better example. Tracer is definitely the hot one in question
This pose is clearly that of a woman presenting herself. I'd prefer poses where I'm being cool/snotty/badass instead of making some nerd's dick hard, kthx.
That is an enormous bulge, wtf.
>>332403791
>tracer
>has an ass
>greymane
>crotch the size of an entire watermelon
>>332403557
im happy no one cares about male sexualisation in video games. more fap material for my fellow fagggots.
>>332403557
>>332403557
Everyone got an ass like that.
But that bulge, Jesus fuck, that must be a monster.
I dont care either way tho.
>>332403557
they both look like Rob Liefeld drawings.
>>332404367
>everyone got an ass like that.
Where do you live? I want to move there.
>>332404883
but anon he just drew a mutant captain america he didn't fuck it up or anything
>>332403557
Silly anon you can't over-sexualize man. Besides, us women like are empowered enough and free with our sexuality so we can look at beastly packages any time we want.
Also, remove that provocative sexual Tracer pose. We are not some sexual objects to fulfill your man power fantasies. This misrepresents women all around the world. Even Arabian sheikhs don't treat women as badly as the artists at Blizzard.
Sorry OP but reverse sexism just doesnt work that way and you're really grasping.
I've heard there is a subreddit called kotakuinaction where you would fit perfectly tho.
>>332403557
Sexism = objectification * privilege
It is factually impossible to be sexists to cis white werewolf.
>>332404945
dude she has no fucking ass that's almost lightning tier
the only thing putting any shape into it are those straps pushing into her thighs
>>332403557
>That bulge
I don't care about your question I just want to see him destroying her with that monolithic dick
I don't know why people are complaining about the pose, she's just standing.
If anything is problematic it's the outfit. If someone wearing cargo pants did that it wouldn't be a problem.
>>332403557
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydii76-1l5w
Neither one is really thay sexy at all. I don't get why there has been such a commotion over that tracer pose - you could give it to everyone pretty easily and it would make more sense than removing it.
>>332403557
that giant bulge and open shirt is triggering me
>>332405219
I don't usually like Shitbiscuit but at least he's on the sane side.
>>332405219
She's such a good friend.
>>332403802
>Not winning so you can make your own dick hard as a reward
>>332403802
>women are not allowed to be sexual creatures
-a dumb internet feminist, 2016
>>332404367
that was what i was thinking. That bulge is much more impressive than any ass overwatch currently has
>>332405121
Then let's swap, you move here and live with the fat asses and I'll live there with those tight things.
>>332403557
Here's an idea. Just flip the pose by defaultand let us rotate it as much as we want.
Problem solved.
>>332405505
i live around fat ass and it's amazing
you just need to go gay already
>>332403557
Nobody would consider the lion sexualized unless they were a gay furfag.
>>332405602
>bulge size of a melon
>not sexualized
are you retarded?
>>332403557
The grill ass. I love it. Wish more grills would look alike.
>>332403557
Probably the girl, the male has a bulge, but everything else isn't really sexualized, I mean it's a fucking cat for god's sake.
>>332405602
>Nobody would consider the lion sexualized
Well, nobody would cosider a view from the back of a character sexualized either, but still...
And why asses are considered sexually suggestive and crotches not?
>apples and oranges
That's a fine false equivalency cherry picked internet feminist argument you got there, but hey whatever supports the brain dead narrative right?
>>332405219
>CA in drawn art
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>332405481
>Women are not allowed to be anything but a sexual creature
- men since forever
>>332403557
What game is that lion-bulge from?
>>332406019
How exactly were housewives in the 1920's nothing but sexual creatures?
>>332406019
That's why we gave women equal rights, yeah?
>>332406094
HotS but you'll never get it unless you like micro transactions and if you do you're a faggot anyway.
Skin-tight pants ass or Bowling Ball sized crotch. This is ahardone.
>>332406019
>implying it isn't raging mad puritanical feminazis who are whining over the supposed sexualization of the Tracer
The only thing this shit proves, is that feminists really are like Christian fundamentalists when it comes to sex.
>>332403557
the real answer to this question is who the fuck cares you tumblrfag
The lion's crotch is bigger than her ass, so right
>>332405602
Anon it is not 1950 anymore. Gay furfags cover more than 50% of the population now you shitlord
>>332403557
If I put myself in every person's shoes, I would be condemning electronics as the devil, shutting this thing off, and go kill myself.
So I can't do that. But sexuality aside, both are equally sexualized, That crotch looks like that lion has a hyper-dick while not only does the girl look deformed, but is clearly showing the full butt-crack as well. The pose is okay, though. Looks like one half to a back-to-back pose.
>>332406149
Their value was earned by being pretty for men and taking care of children. All of this is based on sex.
>>332406168
Nobody 'gave' women anything. They rallied and protested for everything that was 'given' to them. It's not like some good ol' white boys looked at women and though "Hey let's give them some equal rights".
>>332406338
This. It's the only part sjws haven't reached. yet.
>>332403557
Imagine that thing in action. Be as long as her torso.
>>332403557
>girl turns around
OMG SEXIIIIISTTT
>>332403557
My eight-year-old lion saw that out-of-character pose and is now traumatized. Thanks OP
>>332406389
>They rallied and protested for everything that was 'given' to them
Does that include all the human rights that millions of men died for?
>>332406389
>Nobody 'gave' women anything.
Excuse me are you implying that white cis men actually GAVE us rights to vote? Disgusting, you fucking misogynist shitlord how dare you even emply that men had anything to do with female history. Fuck you, you just ruined my day with this post
>>332406149
>>332406389
>Being a homemaker is entirely sexual
Get a clue you fucking idiot. Try thinking outside of your women's studies classes and Tumblr mindset.
>>332403557
>sexualized
There is no clear and agreed-upon definition for this. As far as I can tell it's extremely subjective.
Both pictures display a clear gender, both pictures have idealized bodies that exaggerate the sexual characteristics of their gender, both pictures are in poses that show off said sexual characteristics
They're about the same in pretty much every appreciable way.
Sexuality is experienced differently from the male and female perspective. There is a higher biological and social "cost" for woman in any basic sexual relationship, ranging from the mechanics of penetration, the risk of pregnancy, the dependency of children on lactation, and all the way to social constructs about women and desire.
Men, in the other hand, are basically allowed, by biology and society, to be more aggressively sexual because there are lower risks and cost. Aside of the fear of castration, men have little biological cost for having sex, creating therefore an incentive to seek more pleasure and sex regardless of the cost to others. Even in social terms, and despite of all the SJW-fear mongering, men have basically permission to seek sexual gratification with little repercussion.
Maybe one day we will find tech or medicine that will even the odds: something that will give women more sex drive, less pain in penetration, absolute control over pregnancy, and easy ways out of child bearing and rearing if it occurs regadless. We are not there yet, and therefore, women have to be more guarded, more selective, and society must bend to acknowledge the disadvantage women have in the seek of sexual pleasure.
That is the reason why society does not acknowledge as "equal" the male sex drive as the female one. Objectification and oversexualization of women in games is costly on women, because it creates unrealistic expectations on young males.While is true that your feelings can be hurt because you are being constantly compared with buff men with big dongs, even in the worst case scenario, you still do not have to carry the same burden that women have with sex.
Feminism is not about equality. It's about fairness, and the accommodations we make as a society to achieve it, regardless of biology.
>tfw some random anon trolled 4chinners, plebbitors, goobergabbers, sjws and actiblizzard with just one post
https://youtu.be/gwxcDqwDtxk?t=11m29s
It's only a few minutes but it hits the nail on the head when it comes to things like this. And for those that feel that /v/ are just a bunch of manbabies.
>I don't think they should remove Tracers pose because of one person
>so you think we should objectify her?
>no I just don't think it's a problem when we have 4 other heroes with the same pose
>So you are sexist ? why not just say it? Do you know how much women are objectified??
You can't argue with these people and anyone that pretends that you can is a moron. You are walking on a huge minefield because at the end of the day the person you are arguing against will go for the "MUH CHILDREN" or "MUH OBJECTIFICATION".
>>332406736
>if you put food near ants they'll go for it
More at 11
>>332404965
>>332406664
>Men, in the other hand, are basically allowed, by biology and society, to be more aggressively sexual because there are lower risks and cost. Aside of the fear of castration, men have little biological cost for having sex, creating therefore an incentive to seek more pleasure and sex regardless of the cost to others. Even in social terms, and despite of all the SJW-fear mongering, men have basically permission to seek sexual gratification with little repercussion.
This isn't true at all, unless you are evaluating the world through a lens of a 17th century noble.
>>332406584
Oh woooooow home maker that's great you get to do what everyone else does and have no identity of your own, and in exchange all you have to do is make sure the man is happy with sex because otherwise he'll beat your fucking ass and probably your children too.
>>332403802
you are a fucking nerd
the fact that you post here proves that.
>inb4 projecting
>>332406753
>You can't argue with these people and anyone that pretends that you can is a moron.
This is true. It's like arguing with ISIS.
>>332406664
Here is your (you).
>>332406921
lol no the nerds are the ones complaining that their dicks are only 98% hard because some stupid pose got removed.
why do feminists act like they give a shit about gay men when they conveniently pretend we don't exist whenever it fits their argument
>>332403557
The only thing this picture makes me think about is that webm of tracer sucking that huge fucking dog dick.
That, and same dog dick going into her ass.
>>332406905
1/10 I actually thought you were being serious for a couple of posts.
>>332406905
you sound like someone who lives in a disgusting, dirty home
>>332405602
Nobody would consider a cartoon ass sexualized but here we are being prudes over one.
>>332407113
>Can't refute
>Thinks it's bait
Yeah I'm sure you'd feel complete as a human being if society decided the only thing you were good for was making babies and hoping you land a husband that isn't a drunk asshole.
>itt
>>332405219
very funny
>>332407280
Having equal rights != men and women are equal.
>>332407104
i better investigate to see if that's sexualised or not do you got a link or artist name?
>>332407272
but that isn't what we're talking about. the other anon and i are pointing out your wildly incorrect definition of a homemaker, you disgusting, unclean, unhygienic warthog of a person
>>332406664
8/10 quality bait
>>332406664
>Feminism is not about equality.
No that Egalitarianism you know it is because equalities is in the name.
Feminism is about getting back at men by demanding that men be treated like 2nd class citizens.
With calls for quotas on jobs and outright campaigns to fire male ceos and politicians replace them with women regardless of merit or ability. I'm surprised they haven't yet started calling for every women to get $20,000 a year to make up for the fictitious wage gap they keep crying about.
>>332406664
>Men, in the other hand, are basically allowed, by biology and society, to be more aggressively sexual because there are lower risks and cost.
oh look another feminist who conveniently pretends gay men don't exist when it fits her narrative
fuck off you homophobic bitch
>pretending the controversy is manufactured to divert blame from SJWs getting yet another game censored
Any SJW ITT that can explain how it's okay for women like Kim Kardashian (who is a mother, mind you) to show off her body in every way she can sexually, but it's not okay for tracer to look over her shoulder, indirectly showing that she does, indeed, have an ass, like a normal human being?
>>332403557
HOLY FUCK THAT LION HAS A HUGE FUCKING DICK WHAT THE SHIT
>>332407340
You can probably find it somewhere in the overwatch sfm thread over at /gif/
Be careful anon the thread may or may not be sexualizing women as they are taking giant dicks and animal genitalia into their bodies.
>>332406664
copy paste material
>>332403871
Yeah, but that bulge is more about making the character and by extension the player feel powerful.
It's just some bulge. If you wanna make it sexy/sexualized, you're gonna have to try harder and give it more texture.
>>332403557
neither is you goddamn prude
>>332407330
Having equal rights is the only thing that really matters though.
It's not possible to make everything that is unequal equal.
>>332407330
Errr what? What the fuck do you want on top of equal rights? A dick?I'd like that
>>332406849
Men can seek sex for sexual pleasure with little biological repercussion. It is not to say that is perfectly safe: STDs (hence "fear of castration") and social costs can be devastating, but a basic biological level, is nothing compared with the risk of violence and pregnancy. The physical integrity of women is at higher risk when they seek sexual pleasure, and therefore society has to ever evolve to account for this biological inequity. As I said, men and women are not the same, and never will be, but we can change culture and laws to make things more fair. The fact that you are shamed if you show signs of entitlement t women's bodies is proof that we are going in the right direction.
>>332407378
Never once was homemaker mentioned before some anon brought it up. But if you think 'raising children' = homemaker then you're delightfully misinformed.
>thread about giant furry crotch
>furfags didn't bombed the thread yet
>>332406736
That's old school, I like that.
>>332407330
hello my fellow bernie voter
>>332407667
which is hilarious because you're the only one arguing raising kids = homemaker
again, i wouldn't expect someone who never actually cleans their disgusting hovel to understand that. you clearly have no sense of hygiene
>>332407537
GOOBER GATTER
>>332407635
>>332407623
It's more that you can call all men pigs and not have an ironic 'women are all pigs, too' moment because having equal rights doesn't mean men and women are the same.
>>332407462
It started with the intent of giving equal rights to women because they really didn't have some, by law.
Modern feminism now is what you said.
>>332403557
who's that sexy man on the right
>>332407656
still pretending gay men don't exist, eh?
>>332407537
Because Kim is a real person who can make her own decision. Tracer is some person's (misogynist) creation.
So I wake up this morning and check /v/ only to find multiple threads complaining about a pose being removed,really people?
Look,I understand the outrage if there was content like costumes or gameplay features being removed due to the complaints of one person,but a minor animation being removed is not a big deal.
So is there more to this that I'm not seeing?
Like content being removed along with the pose?
Because I'm not seeing the censorship here...
>>332407537
Tracer doesn't have a choice in the matter. She is being used by a white man to show off her body. She has no free will, and is an instrument of the white dick.
>>332403557
Neither, they're both non-sexualized.
>seeing the shape of an buttock is sexualization
How does society function?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5vmGET6Zww
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP142FojQtk
>>332407858
what if tracer were created as a female power fantasy by a female artist like bayonetta was
>>332407907
Then she should feel bad about working on shitty games.
>>332407858
And that's my problem, Kim made her body and does what she wants with it, Blizzard made tracer, why the fuck shouldn't they be allowed to do what they want with her? Where's the freedom of creativity?
>>332407884
>implying we aren't all instruments of glorious white dick
Remember when people made fun of religious prudes and moral panicks?
>>332407870
>So is there more to this that I'm not seeing?
It's about the principle. Blizzard developers are cutting a barely erotic pose in a game full of fetish fuel because one fuckwad felt it was inappropriate.
>>332407215
>nobody would consider a cartoon ass sexualized
>He says, on a forum literally founded on cartoon porn
im fucking both of them
sorry losers
>>332407656
>The physical integrity of women is at higher risk when they seek sexual pleasure
No it isn't. That hasn't been true since the advent of birth control.
And condoms also exist for men to use. Women can have sex without any repercussions today, so this supposed biological inequity you're talking about does no longer exist.
>>332407962
>women are only allowed to feel good about themselves if they express it in the way *I* want
>>332407272
Its not that women are only good for making babies, its that you cunts are so annoying that i don't want you to be involved in any part of my life.
Your not only good for making babies, the rest of you cunts shitty attitude just makes us avoid you for everything else.
Try being less horrible.
>>332407608
Pfft. Anon. Don't be retarded. Lots of people want to feel like they could pull off any pose and look attractive. Like if you just swept back your hair, you'd look sexy while doing it.
All that said, just having a big dick isn't really that attractive. If you want to see what makes people wet/hard (?) when it comes to big, muscular furries, there are those tigers from Zootpia as a recent example.
>>332408012
So you agree that lion bulge is also sexualized?
That lion's crotch needs to be more detailed to be on the same level as that ass.
>>332407974
But they are doing what they want with her. Someone made a suggestion, they thought about it, changed it and that was that.
If they didn't WANT to change it, they WOULDN'T change it.
>>332407836
Gay man are at higher risk a well, except for the fact that they can't become pregnant. If you can see the world beyond black and white for a second, you see that the logic is the same, but with varying degrees of cost. There are some mechanics of sex (specially on bottoms) that can be costly for sure, so yes, please take "female" and "male" in my King comment to mean gender attitudes, rather than biology.
Jesus christ, look at that bulge.
>>332407974
>Where's the freedom of creativity?
But Blizzard does retain that completely
They just prefer to sell it out.
Which is also their choice really.
Retaining that freedom of creativity is possible for them, just doesnt earn as much money.
>>332407775
>It's more that you can call all men pigs and not have an ironic 'women are all pigs, too' moment because having equal rights doesn't mean men and women are the same.
lol, the point is that it is socially acceptable for women to generalize all men you moron, whereas a man will be shit on and stigmatized for doing the same about women.
>>332403557
It doesn't fucking matter.
None of this fucking matters.
All your doing is helping Blizzard market the game.
NONE OF THIS FUCKING MATTERS
"why isn't the lion more detailed" said people comparing 2005 graphics to 2016 graphics
>>332403557
Blizz already into furry, why the fuck you think Pandaria and Worgen for?
>>332408092
Because you say so
>>332408092
Thats how you lose your T rating.
>>332408053
average_4channer_the_post.jpg
>>332408083
Although I'm sure it will arouse some fucked up furries, I don't believe the intention was for it to be sexualized. Whereas the woman obviously was.
>>332403557
Guys I fixed it
>>332407656
You need to go out more. You clearly have ZERO idea about what the fuck you're talking about.
>>332406736
I want to believe this is true
>>332408137
>still pretending it's about the risk of STDs and not that being gay will get you literally murdered in some places
wew lad
>>332408009
>It's about the principle
>>332403557
Right has a nice bulge. No gfur.
>>332403693
Nom nom nom nom.
>>332408179
It's not socially acceptable. Where did you get this retarded idea?
>>332408109
>>332408169
The point
Your heads
>>332408254
What a powerful man who takes no crap from woman and isn't scared to be sexy.
Truly a figure-head for our generation.
>>332407995
Regressive leftists have inherited their proud legacy of being faggots.
>>332408347
But you forgot to make a point anon.
>>332408254
Looks like a Jojo character now
>>332408369
>implying feminists care about literal gays
>>332408254
thank you anon
>>332408310
>bein pro-censorship
North Korea seems like the right place for you
>>332408310
>hypocrisy
>>332408249
The cartoon ass will also arouse some fucked up people that like to jerk off to cartoons. Both are not real, both are sexualized to arouse people that like that sort of thing. You are assuming the lion is only sexual for some people while the female cartoon is arousing for everyone, and that is your projections.
>>332408254
So tolerant.
>>332408417
Not gays, faggots.
>>332408330
Sure it is.
Women have free reign to shit on men all the time without repercussions.
Do you live in a literal cave?
>>332408310
>le fedora may may xDDDD
>>332408347
Okay make your point. If an artist changes something they made because of a suggestion, how is this not freedom of creativity? Do you think they should never make changes even when they feel it's justified?
>>332408427
nice cherry picking
anti-gg and SJWs are just normal people
fuck off goobergay
>>332408249
>its only sexualization if I say so
Ok
>>332408519
#nys was still completely valid
sorry that a gay man disagrees with you, whiny baby
>>332408254
10/10 men
I just want the SFM faggots to stop making so much fucking Overwatch porn. Why do they always lapse up the shitty games and characters and leave the actually tasty stuff alone?
>>332408310
Fuck off you postmodern pile of human garbage
>>332407870
It's the principle. Naturally people will continue to play it off as nothing 'just some pose' 'go watch porn' e.t.c. Completely missing the point. The point that a single person, whether they are a troll or not, can change the design decisions of a development team on a whim, using nothing more than feels and the children. All these 'minor things that aren't a big deal' will eventually mount up and it's clear that people are starting to get sick of it.
Obviously this will get spun into some sexualization shit as things like this always do. It's a great way to play it off as we've seen in the past.
>>332404945
Come to Miami and mingle with the Cuban ladies you pale cracker fuck.
>>332408037
>> implying birth control pills and condoms are universally accessible and 100% fail proof
>> implying that a women not seeking sexual pleasure can be physically devastated if assaulted (it can happen to men too)
I'm not denying that things are better for women to the Victorian era, but to believe that things have changed completely and there is no cost on sexuality for women is self-serving bunk.
But again, I take your rage an indignation as a sign of progress, actually. This shit wasn't even discussed 20 years ago. Fo internet.
For the record, I think that it was silly to change Tracer's pose. It is ute and sexy and the game seems clearly marketed to a older demo than a pixar movie, so I think it was unnecessary.
>>332408450
>You are assuming the lion is only sexual for some people while the female cartoon is arousing for everyone
You need to read my post again if you think that's what I said. I'm talking about intent. The intent of the woman's pose was to create something with sexual appeal while the lion dude's was not.
>>332408461
Give some examples of women shitting on men all the time where there is no repercussions. And I don't mean people punching them in the face because that's insane. Hell there are neo nazis who say a buncha shit 'without repercussions' by those standards.
Maybe we'd like to bring up Hillary Clinton mentioning that women suffer the most from war yeah I bet she faced no repercussions from that shit.
>>332408369
Funny how leftists are acting like religious nutjobs
>>332405602
pretty much half of /v/ covered there champ
>>332405083
>cis white werewolf
He's probably pink under his fur
>>332408580
>NYS was valid
>he conveniently forgets about Allison Prime.
>>332408427
dayum those are some unattractive men
>>332408284
>Some dude came up with the perfect mix of stuff to complain about some minor part of a beta in hopes that it becomes some viral shitstorm
or
>Some dude makes up a story so he can go "lol trolled you"
Definitely the first one.
>>332408679
It's not really funny, these are largely younger people who have been guilt tripped into holding insane regressive ideologies.
>>332408565
>I can't read
okay
>>332405163
Are you a cuck furry?
>>332408721
sorry that a gay man like myself disagreeing with you is so triggering
>>332408597
If you had opinions the devs actually respected they'd listen to you too.
>>332408773
>using your identity as a shield
wow you're so not a hypocrite right now!
you're completely unlike SJWs!
>>332408770
Are you really implying that watching porn is like cucking yourself because you watch others bang other women?
And that beastiality and furry is the same?
>>332408778
Respected? No. Feared would be more accurate.
#FreeTracer'sAss
>>332408597
Developers listened to someone and that's their decision. You are free to comment about it. Maybe they'll change it back. They are free to change whatever they want based on suggestions by their audience - just because you personally don't like it doesn't mean it's the end of the fucking world.
>>332408842
m8 you are literally trying to discredit the entire movement with 'MUH ALLISON PRIME' and missing the point that minorities genuinely do feel this way
sorry we don't fit your narrative
>>332407775
Men and women are not the same, and equal rights are everything we can give and after that everyone does their best and our system works, the end. What the fuck do you want? Should we make woman men? I still stand by my argument of giving woman dicks, that would be super hot.
>>332408908
>your narrative
what a pathetic scapegoat
>>332408773
No true gayman!
>>332408851
>watching porn is like cucking yourself because you watch others bang other women?
Yes, I am saying exactly that. If you watch BLACKED videos, you are more than likely a cuck. Why do you want to watch some subhuman have sex with a woman you aren't having sex with? Why do you want to watch anyone do that, for that matter? You're better off fapping to solo since you can't get cucked by a woman's fingers.
>And that beastiality and furry is the same?
Where did you even get that from? I just said he's a furry if he wants to see a lion man fuck someone.
>>332408664
You are assuming the intent based on your personal bias. Everything you said so far is personal projection. The way I personaly see it, the bulge was drawn by someone, someone that took the time and effort to make that watermellon sized bulge, maybe the intention was to make it arousing for furries, maybe the person that made that just like big cocks, it is still there for anyone to see. You assume everyone is like you, thinks like you, likes what you like and should dislike what you dislike, you also imply the intent based on your assumptions......in short you make a huge confusion between what is "you" and what are the others. Borderline personality disorders can be helped if you seek help.
Remember, standing behind a girl is RAPE. If she has an ass you RAPED her. You have no argument against this.
>>332408851
Wanting to see a lion fuck is being a cuck desu senpai
>>332408949
sorry, should i use a different term to refer to a set of ideals that don't actually fit into what's going on in the real world?
>>332407775
women are all pigs, though
>>332407858
>>332407884
>le fictional characters can't consent >:(
>also leddit and neofag
>>332407027
>lol
>neogaf
>>332409025
Yeah, a religion.
>>332408645
>implying birth control pills and condoms are universally accessible and 100% fail proof
They are pretty much universally accessible, but yes, they aren't foolproof, but how does this change your lame argument? If condoms and birth control are *mostly* functioning, this means you have literally eliminated one of the biggest problems for women when it comes to get sexual pleasure(i.e getting pregnant).
>But again, I take your rage an indignation as a sign of progress
I'm not being indignant and rageful, just because I disagree with you, you autist.
>>332408671
The #KillAllMen shit that was trending on social media for a while is a good example.
Wait, isn't the guy a werewolf
why is he a lion
>>332408743
>I CANT WRITE
Ok
>>332409030
They can't, you know.
>>332409025
>implying the harassment doesn't exist at all
it's your narrative against theirs and I think their's probably closer to the truth.
>>332409059
>*tips
>>332409070
werelion
Can we see the lion in sexy poses?
For objective comparison purposes obviously.
POST PORN ALREADY
>>332409061
>The #KillAllMen shit that was trending on social media for a while is a good example.
OH YEAH THERE WAS NOBODY TALKING OUT ABOUT THAT AT ALL GEE YOU SURE SHOWED ME ANON
As an overweight individual I would like Blizzard to change this character, as I feel it is shaming me
>>332409102
>*triggers
>>332408997
So, to avoid being a cuck, you never ever fap to porn involving people, correct?
How is it furry if I want to see tracer fucked by some animal-thing?
Wanting to fuck the animalthing would be furry, this is just porn friendly beastiality.
>>332409103
oh after looking it up, it's a costume
still
buff wolves > buff lions
>>332409097
...so you're saying the harassment suddenly makes me not gay or that i suddenly agree with your ass-backwards arguments? like what is your point
again, you're trying to discredit the fact that minorities genuinely disagree with you and aren't a bunch of straight white neckbeards because the whole gg fiasco turned into a fucking mess on both sides
>>332403557
Holy damn that bulge is a thing of beauty.
>>332409013
Controversial opinion here: Her ass was asking for it, even if she wasn't personally. I raped her ass, not HER specifically. We're more than just our bodies you shitlord, we're incandescent pure soul beings, body is just a shell, that's what I raped.
>>332408597
>>332408009
>It's the principle.
holy fuck, youre just as bad.
>>332409213
>buff wolves > buff lions
shit taste
>>332409217
I'm saying you being gay had nothing to do with the conversation and you brought it up to make this about IDENTITY politics instead of censorship.
You're just as bad as the SJWs you claim to fight.
>>332409213
>wolves
i bet you think water is an interesting drink
>>332409213
>>332409320
SCALE>FURSHIT
>>332406389
Technically while women did have to fight to make it happen they were still "given" equal rights since the whole reason they were protesting in the first place was that they didn't have political power (because no vote = no power). I'm not saying that women had no part in suffrage but at the end a bunch of dudes (who probably were mostly white) had to sit down and say "Yeah, I guess we SHOULD give them the right to vote."
>>332403557
daaayum that bulge
>>332408249
>>332408664
That's all you can say
>y-y-you just don't understand me
You keep saying "the intent" for one was sexual while the one was not intended as such, and yeah that is a projection on what YOU think it's sexual for every one and what's not.
>since I don't like it I say the intent wasn't sexual, when I can fap to it I say there was sexual intent
That's how you sound.
>>332409158
>OH YEAH THERE WAS NOBODY TALKING OUT ABOUT THAT AT ALL GEE YOU SURE SHOWED ME ANON
There were, but only people who are very much invested in criticizing feminist rhetoric in the first place.
There is a reason why men are constantly told to "man up", instead of women being told to not being whores and gold-diggers, and this is because we live in a culture where women are privileged.
i know i shouldn’t be surprised of how utterly foolish gamers can be
but man
there are people in the world who don’t even have access to free press
and yet
a game developer looking at feedback, agreeing with it, and changing something as inconsequential as a victory pose… is CENSORSHIP
it’s so mind boggling sometimes
>>332409265
But what about your peanut allergy? You're skirting disaster by raping shells, anon.
>>332409190
>So, to avoid being a cuck, you never ever fap to porn involving people, correct?
Yes.
>How is it furry if I want to see tracer fucked by some animal-thing?
It implies you have interest in seeing an animal do something sexual. Bestiality is pretty bad, regardless.
>>332409213
Only buff wolfgirls.
Buff lizards are obviously the best males.
>>332406019
>Women are not allowed to be sexualized
- Muslims since 610 and regressive leftists since around 2005
>>332409471
good taste
>>332409471
You mean buff lions are best male.
>>332409450
>having allergies
>>332409453
I'm not sure how you are one to have an opinion on porn or fetishes when you refuse to partake in anything like it.
Get back to your imagination about procreating with a faceless female.
>>332409447
So when is your country converting to Sharia law?
>>332409471
>Not buff sharks
Shit taste.
here we go, the thread transform into furry
>>332409343
i said NYS was valid and either you or someone else tried to discredit it with "B-BUT ALLISON PRIME"
and how is my homosexuality not at all related? this started with 'lmao look at how hypocritical these people are, accusing #nys of being white neckbeards when they are exactly that'
you said it was cherry picking and that they're just 'normal people'
i'm proving that NYS's original purpose of pointing out we aren't 'le cishet white neckbeard' that everyone was so desperate to paint us as still stands up, even now
So if I see a woman from behind in the public, am I technically raping her?
>>332409420
>There were
Well there we go there's your whole 'without repercussions' shit out the window. So fuck off. It's not even remotely socially acceptable.
>>332409639
>bringing up NYS at all
why?
>>332409581
Well France is in the middle of a neo Nazi revival so not any time soon
>>332409659
Yes
t. tumblr
I legit want to hear what the artists who've made the art think when some retarded sjw faggot tries to criticize them for being sexist and offensive to him.
Even better if said artist would personally tell him to fuck off.
>>332409489
Stopping their rapist culture is racist.
>>332409012
Do you actually think they were trying to appeal to furries' sexuality? I mean it's pretty fucking obvious, the majority of gamers are straight males despite what feminists are trying to tell us, and sex has been used to sell every product since fucking forever. This woman is obviously meant to appeal to gamers on a sexual level. That much is a given and if you won't accept that then you're obviously just trolling.
So given that, you also believe that the lion was also designed to appeal to people's sexuality? You really think that's what's going on here?
>>332408671
>Give some examples of women shitting on men all the time where there is no repercussions
What about that engineer who had to apologise in a broadcast because of the clothes he was using? The same clothes that were given to him by his girlfriend but was still sexist because a man can never NOT be sexist.
>>332408240
I mean can you name one thing that women do better than men other than lose at sports, get raped, cry, bleed out of their vagina, complain, and get beat the fuck up?
Women are the inferior gender, and we've been nice enough to call you equals and give you equal rights, but you keep complaining.
It must have been so horrible for those poor women to have the awful task of cooking (a hobby for most), caring for children (what all humans have doon for literally ever), and have sex (one of the most enjoyable things for either gender) while her husband was out digging in the coal mine at best slowly developing lung cancer, and at worst getting crushed by rocks or machinery.
Stop complaining, you vapid cunt.
>>332409659
>>332406736
>>332403557
I'm bisexual, it's the girl.
I didn't even notice the bulge, my eyes were drawn to his chest
>>332409748
Stopping the left's racist culture is rapist.
>>332409694
because the sole purpose of notyourshield was to point out that actual minorities and marginalized groups were participating in pro-GG shit and that people couldn't pull the 'YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT MINORITIES' card
literally the first picture in this argument was the one calling out the same people who tried to portray us as cishet white neckbeards are cishet white neckbeards themselves
>>332407330
what do you want? Communism? Giving everyone equal rights does not mean some groups will pursue what others pursue and create 100% equal representation in all walks of life like an episode of Captain Planet or some shit.
>>332409669
Lets just say, that it's way more socially acceptable for women to call all men pigs, than it is for a man to call all women whores.
Whiteknights and feminists will come running out of the woodwork if a man says something like that, whereas the likelihood is that there isn't a man with balls in the room to speak up if a woman does the same.(Because he knows what will happen if he does).
>>332403557
>right gets my smooth, bulgy pussy pisswet
>left is the fun girl you like to be friends with because of her repressed sexuality so she will never take any of the boys from you
it's always win if your a girl
>>332409352
>he thinks wolves are vanilla
maybe if you limit your stuff to western shit
>>332409471
I go with wolf > dragon > eagle > lizard > panther > hawk/falcon > chameleon > cheetah > otter > ram > tiger > snake > lion > raccoon > stag
>>332409659
Not technically. Totally. You are 100% raping her. Video games have clouded reality for you and you can't even tell when you're raping someone!
>>332409774
>>332403557
Neither, it's okay to be sexy. Stop being so fucking insecure america.
>>332409763
I can't believe that guy cried. What a fag. lol
t. fArts student
>>332409820
so you used NYS... as your shield? the fuck is wrong with you?
