Was it any good?
>>332391532
No
If you like loading screens, then yes, it was good.
Much chuckles as someone else using a mobile phond to post got a ban and I now have their ip.
>>332391532
I heard the game was nearly identical to Just Cause 2.
Just cause is a bargain bin $5 franchise. It'll probably have a resurgence when it's cheaper.
>>332391532
Finished it yesterday, loved it.
Loved doing bombing runs on bases with a bomber jet
![A7dg6QXCAAEbhz9[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/N6aempL.jpg "A7dg6QXCAAEbhz9[1].jpg")
co-op would've saved that game
but nope
devs are dicks
>ran the 2nd game maxed out like butter
>can't even keep a steady framerate with every setting on low for 3
>yet my rig can handle GTA V on High/Very High settings at 60fps
I thought the devs were masters at optimisation.
>>332392683
thats really unfair to JC2
>>332392965
it was made by a b-team based in new york
amerifats can't into game optimisation
it's shit, 2 is better in almost every way
Eyesore inducing aliasing, long ass load time for fucking everything, constant server disconnection.
Fuck the B team and Square Enix, go pirate Mad Max if you enjoy repetitive sandbox games, but avoid this crap unless you are a big fan of 2, wait for DLC & sales either way
Played the Xbox version
Super fun, but when you have do just about anything explosive the frame rate goes into single digits. Its amazing how badly optimized it is and still allowed to be on the shelf. Thankfully I like flawed games.
>>332391532
It was shit.
>>332392683
I wish. I preordered the game thinking that it's going to be JC2 with better graphics and bigger map and it ended up being my biggest vidya buyer's remorse ever.
It mig
t've been ok i
f playing it was
n't constantly as ann
oying as try
ing to re
ad thi
s
p
ost becaus
e of se
ver
e op
timiza
tion is
sues.
>>332391532
Its shit. Dont buy it unless its only like 5$.
