ITT: Times /v/ was wrongIt's actually fun
>>332370000
They weren't necessarily wrong about alot of aspects, but I still enjoyed it. Shit story though
>>332370000
>wasted potential, the game
The minutemen could be so cool. You could have made your own libertarian paradise with your army of blue-coats.
Instead you get one quest and a settlement gimmick that doesn't really do much.
>>332371029
Hi bitterness
>>332372083
hi randy.
>>332370000
nice quads m8
>>332372116
;^)
game is shit.
no matter of quads or reposting faggot comics will ever change this
you're better off making "NO GUYS, PATCH 2.0 FIXED EVERYTHING!" threads. thats how unconvincing you are
>>332371029
Fun trumps all, eh.
will i ever get anything done? i only just started and i already have 3 "settlements" which apparently all need building and securing and a work force and i really don't know what i'm doing. it this going to keep happening? i mean it's nice since it gives my scavenge hunts more meaning, picking up the junk actually does something - but i'm never ever gonna get anything done at this rate. every 10 steps in the wasteland i find yet another location and it takes me 3 trips back and forth hauling junk, breaking it down, and reorganizing my inventory at the work bench, and i haven't even started building in sanctuary yet, let alone red rocket station and the nearby farm.
>>332370000
best sonic game ever.
>>332372302
It's only fun if you don't think about it.
>>332370000
Shit game, shitty fanbase
>>332372370
Don't bother with the settlement building
Just do the quests
>>332372417
I wouldn't say its the best Sonic game but the last good one.
>>332370000
It's fun, but its hollow, gets old, and you're left with the need to actually play a fleshed out game instead of different game mechanics stapled together
XCom 2 feels sort of like it, to a lesser degree
For a game I'd give Fo4 a 6/10 as a game, playable, but why bother when you can play a better game
As a shooter it gets 6/10 for being pretty fucking shit in that department
As a fallout game it gets a 3/10 for making ice robot models and making power armor feel like power armor, while completely abandoning the role-playing, continuing the shit lore from Fo3, having boring as fuck factions, and buries you in settlements because they couldn't be assed to build anything beyond Diamond City and Goodneighbor, both of which are pretty bland, and then making every quest "go kill x then come back for 50 caps"
>>332372417
Wrong
>>332370000
>>332372370
Bethesda decided it would be a good idea to tie the ability to create supply lines to a perk which requires a large investment into an otherwise useless stat.
You must either waste 5 special points or spend dozens of hours of tedious and long loading times shipping your loot between settlements.
But hey, it's fun so none of the flaws matter amirite Panjeet?
>>332370000
>>332372786
20 hours into this and I don't get why they added armour if I can just use the power armour
>>332373034
Because you can wear the armour under the power armour?
Also if you're on your first playthrough fusion cores can be hard to find in the first few hours.
>>332373034
So you can play non-armor runs since pArmor completely breaks the game when you get rolling with it
>>332372967
i maxed chr and int first on my character; is it ok? people say its not an RPG so i probably done fucked up.
>>332373271
No your stats barely matter since a: there's no level cap and b: the only perks you need are the damage ones and they're available at level 2/3.
>>332372797
good game interesting maniacs and great level design only problem is no chao world.
>>332373034
It's just to keep the hardcore fans happy. You force the player to spend the entire game in power-armour. It would drastically reduce player customisation and further reduce playstyles.
Although they already did that with the new perk system. There's no point to replaying F4.
>>332372586
Somehow the fanbase is shittier than the games
>>332372417
>being this wrong
wew
>>332370000
It was worth buying. Regardless of the problems it has, I had fun andstill put 70+ hours into it...which makes it a good purchase.
>>332370000
Anybody know how good automatron was? I'm wondering if it's worth the $9.99
