>yfw Starfox zero has no online multiplayer
>wanting nintendo's netcode on a console without an ethernet port
I'd never even considered that it might have multiplayer?
Why would you want it to?
>>332347328
Miyamoto pls.
>>332346656
I don't know what it would be like so I can say I'm sad it's missing.
Star Fox is a score attack game, all it needs are leader boards.
The franchises tacked on failed attempts at multiplayer were always a mistake.
>yfw no man's sky also has no online multiplayer
>>332347751
It does but honestly you're right. Why bother having it if you can't even really interact with anyone?
>>332347693
I never met a SF fan that didn't like multiplayer so I don't know what your saying.
Which Starfox had online multiplayer?
>>332347901
It doesn't have multiplayer at all anymore, you don't have a chance of meeting another player
>>332347983
you have no chance of meeting another player but there are some 'multiplayer elements' like seeing other people's named creatures and stuff
>>332346656
Why would it have online multiplayer? It's a Nintendo game. Does the Wii U even have online capabilities?
>>332347983
Only Command sadly.
>>332346656
it's a rail shooter. How would online multiplayer even work?
>>332346656
Did A Fox in Space just posted another video?
>>332347328
to play multiplayer online? jesus you nintendo apologists are the fucking worst
>>332348329
>I never Star Fox
>>332348570
I think he means why would you want a game like Star Fox to have online multiplayer. Sure, dogfighting in all-range mode would be fun, but any kind of lag would ruin the entire experience.
64 and assault had amazing multiplayer vs modes. Not having a version of them with online options is a major disappointment
>>332348673
I am literally the greatest SF64 player in the world, and I have not once touched the multiplayer in that game. I do not give a shit about multiplayer in Star Fox.
>>332346656
>Fox pulls his pants down just so there can be a "oh man I'm not gay"joke
WHO THE FUCK NEEDS TO TAKE OFF THEIR PANTS TO SHOW THEIR LEGS
>>332346656
>promoting furfaggotry of the eldritch kind
>>332348710
>any kind of lag would ruin the experience
That's true for a significant amount of multiplayer games and they manage. Star Fox should not be a network taxing game really at all.
>>332348965
Have you ever tried playing Smash Bros online? It's bad enough dealing with Nintendo netcode on a 2D plane, I can't even imagine trying to fight in 3D space and deal with that kind of lag.
>>332348808
>Greatest player only played the casual campaign.
>>332348710
Actually really I don't understand why you would want multiplayer in Starfox period. It was terrible in 64 and it was terrible in Assault.
At it's core its a score attack series. Multiplayer just plain doesn't make sense.
>>332348673
I don't think I've ever seen anyone praise the multiplayer of Star Fox, most people focus on the single player
>>332348965
Try playing Splatoon with the japs, the tiniest hint of lag and the lobby rolls a dice whether to disconnect you or not
>>332349071
The campaign is the game. Multiplayer is literally just an additional mode.
>>332348570
Tacked on multiplayer. Just what we need. Go back to playing Titanfall.
>>332349069
>>332349121
This is exactly why it's a valid thing to complain about. OP said why would you want that? Because we should want our devs and publishers to not be 15 years behind on net code capability.
>>332347328
Crimson Skies had it and it was great.
Playing Star Fox for the multiplayer is like playing Minesweeper for the story.
>>332349528
Good for Crimson Skies. We're talking about Star Fox.
>>332346783
>what is an ethernet adapter
>>332349528
Not even the same genre.
>>332349658
>You can only enjoy one aspect of a game at any given time.
Nintendo has succesfully made people settle for less, no wonder they're making shitty spin offs and lacking games.
>>332349720
needing to buy something for my WiiU to use an ethernet cord is honestly pretty shitty
The only Star Fox game with multiplayer worth a shit was Assault, and that's because of On Foot gameplay and 4 players. if you're complaining about no online gunner/pilot co-op, then I'd understand, but if it's only for All Range dogfighting then that's a big ass whatever the fuck.
>>332349087
>multiplayer doesn't make sense in a game where you fly around and shoot stuff
>>332349720
>autism
just use Wifi you autist
>>332349880
Not every game should have a multiplayer mode, and Star Fox is a series were multiplayer doesn't make any sense and their attempts at it have proven to be complete dogshit.
You might as well bitch about the lack on online multiplayer in Life is Strange. It simply doesn't make sense to include it.
>>332350102
>autism
I have brick walls and live in a basement. I pretty much have to use an ethernet adapter. More importantly, it gives you a better connection for games where timing is important, e.g. Smash.
First y'all complain about games adding unnecessary multiplayer components and bitching about how that time spent could've been used to better the SP, and now complain about that NOT happening?
>>332350105
I'm sorry you don't have friends that like Star Fox anon but every SF player I met has enjoyed the multiplayer, Assault being the series highlight.
>>332346783
Nintendo's netcode is good
Except for Smash because in sakurais eyes, online is a deep afterthought.
>>332350470
To have genuinely thought that Assault's multiplayer was anything but trash you'd have to have been a blind, zealous Nintendo fanboy that was completely fucking ignorant about the state of multiplayer shooters on the PC and other consoles.
>>332348337
nope
How the fuck would multiplayer even work?
OP you're retarded.
This whole thread is retarded
Multiplayer in Star Fox is as retarded as it would be in fucking Space Harrier.
>>332350428
>/v/ is one person
Personally, it would be nice to have online multiplayer, as I have no one to play the game with in person, but it's not a dealbreaker for me.
>>332351185
>>332351661
Thing is you're complaining about online multiplayer. Do we even know if it has offline multiplayer?
Kinda getting ahead of yourself there.
>>332347328
The DS starfox had one and it was alright
Imagine one with an actual map design and better controls and netcode
How would multiplayer even work in this game? Does it even have it?
>>332351998
It has a 2-player mode where one person flies and the other shoots
>>332346656
The game was delayed to add multiplayer you fuckchop.
>>332352085
There was nothing alright about Starfox Command. That was one of the worst games Nintendo have ever put out in their entire history.
>>332351396
64 and Assault had decent multiplayer
>>332352251
>There was nothing alright about Starfox Command
Except forthe ending where Fox and Falco become F-Zero racers
>>332352251
Nice opinion
Here's mine. I thought it was alright
>>332352187
That sounds like something you hand off to your little brother to stop being being a pest, not something you'd want to play online. I mean who the fuck is going to own a copy of the game and instead of playing it themselves be the gunner bitch of someone else online?
It's a tacked on addition to the single player at most.
>>332352421
You got me there. That's the ONE thing though.
>>332352489
I see it as something a parent can play with their child
>>332352364
Eat shit.
>Faggots actually defending a game with space dogfighting not having online
>>332353916
But he's right. God /v/ has been shittier than usual with it's threads today but this one just takes the fuckin cake.
>>332353916
rude
>>332354254
Why not fuck off then
>>332346783
without monthly fees
Literally-who game like EDF4.1 has more weapon variety, classes, levels, enemies and scripted scenarios.
It's easily a 50+ hour game on single player alone, with 98 levels, hundreds of weapon unlocks and progressive stat upgrades. Has couch co-op and couch PvP. You have ground combat, small mechs, giant mechs, crawlers, tanks, APCs, flying vehicles, bikes, flying classes, nukes, so on and so forth
It's a low bugget title from a very small team.
And yet...
..It also has online multiplayer, not just shitty matchmaking but customizable lobbies which is what everyone uses. You can spend 5 hours on the same level if you wish. You can play on the highest difficulty with 3 other expert players and try to overcome almost impossible odds through cooperation and a solid strategy, by inviting them to a party chat and talking to each other.
Also, servers aren't region-locked, it's international.
How can Nintendo fail this much with a 1st party title which clearly has a higer budget and took more time to develop?the saddest part is that there are nintendo fans defending this or saying "It doesn't matter. I don't care, it's just an arcady game"
>>332346656
You are gonna watch A Fox in Space, right?Ready for more sexual tension?are you ready for the Wolf x Fox scene?
>>332346656
>yfw people ruin great images with furfag edits
>>332356282
If he ever finishes it
But damn I forgot about how bad the lag could fuck it
I just kind of equate it to Mario kart, only instead of racing people I'm dogfighting people
>>332355896
But Platinum is the one developing it, not Nintendo, an arguably smaller team considering they're split up into different sections
>>332346656
>people in the thread are actually defending its ok to NOT have multiplayer
I really hope it is bait
>the new star fox game doesn't have multiplayer
Boo fucking hoo. The only star fox game with good multiplayer was Assault and the rest of the game was shit.
>>332357485
>get 64 gameplay
>add online Assault multiplayer
was it that hard? jesus fuck miyamoto is becoming george lucas
>>332357727
>get one kind of gameplay
>spend twice as much money and twice as much time making an entirely different game mode that works in a completely different way just to tack on some unnecessary multiplayer component
Yeah, no thanks.
>>332357894
>project guard
>>332351669
could this be the new Pacha
