8.5
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
http://www.polygon.com/2016/3/28/11306708/oculus-rift-review
>>332295283
>8.5 too problematic, not enough censorship
>>332295283
>linking to polygon
kill yourself you worthless fucking piece of human trash
>>332295448
this tbqh
Just fuck off cuckera
>number ratings
>>332295283
>reviewing an extremely memey gimmicky peripheral that only has gimmicky games
The fuck?
>>332295283
>Linking to polygon
>>332295283
>basing your review on the potential of something
trash-tier journalism as usual, nothing to see here
>>332295283
>Polygon
>It made us feel.
>>332296516
>>332296340
>>332295448
I'm not OP but I'm wondering what the /v/ approved games media sites are. Gather Your Party? Pietriots?
>>332298625
they're all bad
>>332298625
You don't ever link to the website directly. You make a pastebin of the article's text and link to that.
>>332298625
Kill yourself
>testing hardware instead of games
yet the wiiU won that excuse for a "gen"
>>332298824
What if the site is non-commercial though? Like it's jsut a wordpress.com blog that pay wordpress to exist and doesn't/cant run it's own ads.
>Giving a number rating to a piece of hardware
also
>Polygon
As much as I want to try out some VR, this doesn't sound like it's worth the price tag at this point.
>>332299394
It's not save your money.
>>332298625
ChristCenteredGamer, apparently.
Yes, really.
Apparently, the person who writes for that site separates the 'moral' score and the 'quality' scores.
They're someone with an opinion, not an agenda, and /v/ responds really well to them for that reason.
>>332295448
This to be honest.
If you archive the webpage and want to make fun of it, I think that's really the only viable scenario.
Thank fuck Gawker is being leg dropped. We just need the Undertaker to wipe out Polygon now.
