![Witcher_2_cover[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/tlabSzH.jpg "Witcher_2_cover[1].jpg")
Name a game with worse combat
Protip:You can't
![latest[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/xGnMtq3.jpg "latest[1].jpg")
/thread
>>332095045
This
>>332095045
First post best post
>>332094861
Dark Souls pretty much has shit combat
only the autists and manchildren with no real sense of purpose in life will defend it
>>332094861
The Witcher 3, easy.
>look mom i shitposted!
>>332094861
>>332095372
Why is it that people who shit on Souls combat can never actually name a flaw?
>>332095045
But the witcher 1 has good combat. Very satisfactory to watch.
>>332094861
Skyrim
>>332095563
It's either boring circle for backstabs if ur cheesy, or dodge one attack, land ur own, dodge one, land one etc.
And Bloodborne's solution was just making enemies swing alot everywhere.
Also hitboxes
Also little weight in combat
>>332095916
So how is that drastically different from Witcher combat?
>>332095704
>But the witcher 1 has good combat
lol
>>332095704
If you like rhythm games I guess you'll like it
>>332094861
>>332096068
It was actually neat little feature to prevent player from spamminng. Besides, combat shouldn't really be a focus in RPG game and it was just that way in w1. Furthermore it was pretty unique. I can understand making a different combat for w2 to appeal to burger people, but it just turned out bland and medicore at best.
Also, w1 combat is most faithful to the books.
I bet amerifats who whine at witcher 1 couldn't play gothic for 5 minutes as well.
>>332096025
It's not. But I named big flaws in the combat. It's really undynamic, or in Bloodborne just chaotic in a bad way.
>>332095045
Nope. TW1 had the most enjoyable and entertaining combat of the entire trilogy.
>>332096068
I don't like rhythm games, and I love TW1's gameplay.
>>332096696
Ok.
And that's related to this thread... how?
>>332096696
So you admit that they're similar, but can you name some ways that Souls combat is inferior to Witcher combat? Witcher combat is essentially just Souls combat dumbed down.
>>332095916
>It's either boring circle for backstabs if ur cheesy, or dodge one attack, land ur own, dodge one, land one etc.
Most enemies couldn't be backstabbed or it wasn't worth it.
Also you are pretty much whining that combat is combat because you dodge something and then hit something.
>And Bloodborne's solution was just making enemies swing alot everywhere.
Yeah games where enemies are aggressive are good.
>Also hitboxes
Better than Witcher, acceptable for an action game overall. A bit of terrible ones.
>Also little weight in combat
Sounds like bullshit with no real meaning.
On PC. Holy hell... still unfinished for me....
>>332096465
This, geralt movement were better at witcher 2.
don't know how it would be with 60 frames, but at 30-40s it's utter shit.
Dragon age 2
>>332096795
So you like rhythm games, because of that's basically what Witcher 1 combat is
Mass Effect 1
That shit is horrific.
>>332097294
Stop this shit. Rhythm games are usually hard and with variety of inputs.
>>332097294
It basically is not a ryth game. It's real time combat with combo mechanism relying on timing. If it was dice rolls would you still say it is basically tabletop game? Faggot.
>>332097294
witcher 1 had more fitting combat for an rpg than either of the sequels
plus since when is any kind of timing system rhythm game mechanics now?
>>332095916
>>332095372
top zoz, someone sucks at the souls game
>>332097428
So it's an easy rhythm game
>>332094861
Summoner 1 on PC. It's so fucking ass backwards.
I literally think people who say Witcher combat is shit have played like 10 games in their live and only modern AAA shit at that.
>>332097727
It's a rhythm game someone who likes rhythm games usually wouldn't like.
>>332096465
>>332097179
>This, geralt movement were better at witcher 2.
While I agree with you completely, I think it really comes down to a matter of preference. Both were shit, but TW2 combat was only better by a small margin.
TW2 felt stiff, while TW3 felt floaty and had very awkward movement.
Skyrim
>>332094861
Any japanese game.
>>332094861
At least it was balanced. In tw3 quen is even more OP and alchemy = god mod.
>>332095886
>>332097727
Oh my fucking god.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythm_game
The Witcher is nor music-themed nor does it challenge your sense of rythm AT ALL. This alone pretty much proves you are a faggot.
>>332097338
Don't fucking remind me, Anon. Please delete this post before there are more casualties.
>>332098260
>wikipedia
Kek, kill yourself retard
>>332097821
i like rhythm games and liked the witcher too
it's pretty retarded to call the witcher a rhythm game but i'm fairly sure you're just baiting at this point
>>332097567
>>332097573
It's a glorified rhythm game you tards. That's literally all it is
>>332095045
First post is most times right
>>332098410
You know they cite their information/sources at the bottom of every entry, right? It's a encyclopedia...
>>332097823
>awkward movement.
it's garbage man TW2 felt like a game at least, while TW3 was like half finished walking simulator.
it's very weird for a AAA game with this many awards but can't get the movement of your only playable character right. even bethsda does it better, they have multiple views as well.
>>332098410
Why is it a bad source again? Especially with 105 citations included?
>>332098616
Then I love how in this "ryth game" you are talking to NPCs, leveling up your character and progressing through storyline. I also enjoy the rythm based combat because it's fun to do and watch.
You win, it's a ryth game all right. Could you fuck off now you retard?
>>332098024
Are you fucking high? Skyrim has godawful combat
>>332099053
>>332098704
It's obviously not literally a rhythm game but it shares many things with them
Taking everything word for word is a sign of autism, you know
>>332099270
>It's obviously not literally a rhythm game but it shares many things with them
> it shares many things with them
>many things
I see you are changing strategy from "it's BASICALLY a ryth game" to just "it shares many things with them"
So what does it share besides a time window in which you've got to act to achive a combo?
Any Legend of Zelda game
the combat in this game was fine
>>332099549
Rhythm sense
>>332098457
You are the retarded exception I accounted for then and are dumb enough not to understand the general idea that when you like some genre you probably don't like shit games of that genre.
>>332099872
that would imply the witcher is either a shit game or a rhythm game, it's neither
>>332100565
>shit game
>rhythm game
pick 2
>>332094861
Dark Souls 2
>>332095704
>Very satisfactory to watch.
But not to play, which you'll recall is the purpose of a fucking video game. It's faggots like you that made modern games get so infested with QTEs, since that's the entire fucking philosophy behind it.
>>332101359
I liked w1 and I hate QTEs
>>332095045
Wrong. TW2 and TW3 tried to be good ARPG and failed horribly. TW1 didn't, and while the combat is definitely not great at all, it did what it set to. More satisfying animations, too.
>>332101359
>every genre is the same
W1 was more on the RPG side.
Do you shit on Baldur's Gate games and etc. because most combat is simply right clicking something ONCE and then watching how shit gets slaughtered?
Vidya nowadays is mostly shit because of faggots like YOU, who want every game, no matter the genre, to play and be the same.
