which one /v/?
>>331829497
left
>>331829759
the skin tone looks more natural right?
right is sexist because he's too white
so anyways, right is VisualV (which surprisingly is almost close to default)
left is Razed's SweetFX: http://sfx.thelazy.net/games/preset/3569/
>>331829497
Right looks less ugly so right.
>>331830487
what is legitamtely wrong with the left one? i'm really torn between visualv or this reshade preset. i feel like the left one has the textures pop out a bit more, and the color is better
>>331829497
Right.
>that aliasing
neither
>>331829497
Left is better because he doesn't look like a fucking zombie. White peoples skin is not that fucking pale, especially not after being in the sun for a while. Right also makes the weird ass arm and hand textures worse.
>>331831087
blame Paint
>>331831109
yeah default/visualV all the textures are sort of blurred. but with a tiny bit of sharpening you can see all the details like in rockstar's screenshots
>>331830487
>>331830986
I'm really curious as to what isn't better about the left one
>>331831109
>>331831223
The one on the left looks retarded, he's fucking orange like an Oompaloompa or something.
>>331831109
>>331831753
Perhaps your monitor isn't calibrated, that's why some people think the right is way too white or the left is way too orange.
I know when I had the VisualV(right) one open in Windows Photo Viewer, he was a very pale/bright white. But once I uploaded the image and viewed it in Chrome, it wasn't so extreme.
>>331832132
What is this?
Mine is the best.
>>331829497
Right. Unnatural sharpening and saturation look like shit.
>>331833640
what mod anon?
Left because right is too blurry.
>>331829497
left
>>331829904
>>331830580
>>331830986
>>331831753
have you lived in California?
>>331834282
10 seconds in sweetfx: not being a retard like OP edition
>>331834451
Fuck California, right is unnatural even for Siberia.
which comes first /v/?
>Framerate
>Anti Aliasing/Resolution
>Reflections, Shadows, PostFX, Shader Quality etc.
>>331834839
>having to choose 1
>not owning a 980ti
fucking casual filth
>>331834964i got a 970
>>331834839
Resolution > Framerate > Everything else
>>331834839
framerate, is this even a fucking question?
>>331829497
Eyes open or closed?
>>331829497
I don't care
>>331834839
Normally framerate, but when I played GTA 5 first I only had a 780, and somehow the game felt smooth and responsive at even 40 fps, so instead of lowering the graphics I kept it at near maximum. It was strange, maybe a placebo, i dunno.
>>331829497
Both suck.
>>331834839
>framerate, which affects gameplay
>versus graphics settings
Tough choice, I think I'm gonna pick the gameplay option.
>>331840067
>resolution doesn't affect gameplay
good luck playing at 240p kid
>>331830419
then use neither
What about this
messing around with reshade presets in GTAV
>>331840576
TRASH
>>331840576
lmao at the filename
you tried
>>331834839
I'd say that reaching 35-50 fps is enough in case you want the game to be playable and still look good.
Sub 30 fps is really bad so don't do it.
>>331829497
Niether, Jesus Christ that liquid and that glass are absolutely disgusting.
>>331840576
You could at least find a photo of a place loosely similar to something in GTAV.
