[1] GameCube:
• That early 00's charm
• Large worthwhile library
• Worthwhile titles are maximally noteworthy
[2] SNES:
• That early 90's charm
• Small worthwhile library
• Worthwhile titles are maximally noteworthy
[3] NES:
• That classic Nintendo charm
• Large worthwhile library
• Worthwhile titles are moderately noteworthy
[3] Wii U:
• Gimmicks instead of charm
• Small worthwhile library
• Worthwhile titles are very noteworthy
[4] N64:
• That deep 90's charm
• Small worthwhile library
• Worthwhile titles are moderately noteworthy
[5] Wii:
• Gimmicks instead of charm
• Small worthwhile library
• Worthwhile titles aren't very noteworthy
>charm
>>331798071
Ok
Nes: 6/10
Super Nintendo: 5/10
N64: 3/10
GC: 2/10
Wii: 10/10
WiiU: 1/10
>>331798071
>Gamecube
>Large worthwhile library.
Stop. It's funny, because the Wiiu is literally GC 2.0. As in, it has a great small collection of amazing first party games, but shits the bed in terms of quantity.
Literally kill yourself.
>SNES
>small worthwhile library
>>331798071
NES 7/10
SNES 9/10
N64 10/10
GC 7/10
WII 3/10
WII u 1/10
>>331798071
Hm, I guess you're right about the N64. Never really gave it much thought, but it didn't have a whole lot of games.
OoT was fucking dope, though.
>>331799447
Low bait
Nes: 6/10
Super Nintendo: 9.5/10
N64: 7/10
GC: 8.5/10
Wii: 6.5/10
WiiU: 7.5/10
>>331800146
This guy knows
>>331798071
>gamecube library
So what, TYD and Melee? Other than that, every 1st party entry was mediocre. Take off your fucking nostalgia goggles also
>that controller that buried the fucking system and handed the generation to Sony
SNES > NES > Wii U = GC > N64 > Wii
>>331800146
/thread
>>331798071
>Gaycube
>gaems
Top kek
NES 5/10
SNES 10/10
N64 7/10
GameCube 6/10
Wii 5/10
Wii U 1/10
>[4] N64:
>• Worthwhile titles are moderately noteworthy
The fuck are you talking about? also putting Wii U above N64 you must be retarded.
N64 had a small amount of worthwhile games but granted they were the best. Mario 64, OoT, Banjo.
Nintendo hasn't had games since the SNES
>>331798306
>>331799643
>>331800129
>>331800839
>>331800937
>>331801362
its my opinions guys
>NES
A good library with a balance of bigger games and smaller arcade-esque titles.
>SNES
A wide assortment of classic games and sequels. Showcased some strong art direction mixing well with technology.
>N64
Had some of the most revolutionary 3D games around, but karma caught up with Nintendo at this point and the business suffered.
>GameCube
Some really memorable games and decent specs, but questionable design choices of the system meant it had trouble competing in an increasingly western-dominated market.
>Wii
Technologically-unimpressive but had a fresh take on games and some pretty stellar first-party titles. Third party titles were plentiful but also mostly terrible. Exceptions exist and helped round out the library nicely. Unfortunately the marketing angle meant a lot of people would never give it a chance.
>WiiU
Lazy marketing and being new to HD game development results in Nintendo's first HD system tanking pretty hard. Amateur mistakes in promoting their product and learning from competitors, topped with third party negotiations falling apart, mean that the system doesn't have much to offer beyond the bigger hits. Attempts to curtail losses by releasing fewer AAA releases kind of backfires when most of them are shallow.
>NX
Hopefully a stronger showing. We'll see.
>>331801741
Yes, and your opinion is shit.
Nes: 7/10
Super Nintendo: 8/10
N64: 9/10
GC: 5/10
Wii: 1/10
WiiU: 2/10
