![DS3-2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/iskCvNg.jpg "DS3-2[1].jpg")
How did this series I once loved turn to shit so quickly
Liking one game is not liking a series.
Because you're a cynical cuck who think's a game's demise is due to popularity
>>331684348
The last good game by Miyazaki was Dark Souls 1
Demon Souls was good too
>new souls game released
>/v/ jumps on the hate train immediately, like always
Why does this always happen
>>331684239
>>331684432
ITT: People who didn't play Bloodborne
>>331684358
Be sure to buy that season pass while you're at it like the good goy you are :^)
My friend, you must take break from this series for a while. The game is good or bad? Do not let this worry you. Play some older games, something new, something different. Try new genres.
One day you will come back, and then you can come to this game without bias, without expectations, then you can see the game for what it truly is.
Hype is dangerous thing my friend. Be wary.
>>331684439
Doesn't matter, by release everyone will be talking about how good it is
It'll stop when reviews hit, most likely
>>331684432
Have you played 3?
>people defend yearly reskins of gook games but somehow CoD is bad
Weebs are truly the most disgusting people on this planet
>>331684439
TRYING TO FIT IN
>>331684239
>Love game
>Game is loved by other people
>No longer love game
Looks like Specialsnowfliaketis to me.
>>331684680
Just like how Dark Souls 2 got great reviews and it was actually shit right?
Dark Souls 3's early-mid game is much, much better than Dark Souls 1's.
Y'all just butthurt contrarians, as always.
>>331685028
Dark Souls 2 was great, you parrot. It just didn't live up to your high expectations.
Why does this series get a free pass with yearly releases?
It's another rehash
>>331685150
>Dark Souls 2 was great
yea nah
>>331685182
Because people have different taste opposed to yours.
Its miraculous, isn't it?
People having different opinions and preferences - pfft, thats unheard of!
will dark souls 3 be the dark souls of the dark souls franchise
>>331685182
Because the last Dark Souls game came out two years ago and the one before that came out 5 years ago. So it gets a free pass for being a yearly release since it doesn't come out yearly.
>>331685341
>its ok when fromsoft does it
ok
>>331685150
>high expectations
>expecting the lighting system they showed off in trailers to work is a high expectation
>>331685537
>its ok when people hold different opinions and actually enjoy the "le rehashes"
ftfy fampai
>>331685413
>im going to ignore those cash grabbed rereleases
how much can you shill
>>331685657
I guess they better not release Uncharted 4 this year since the collection came out less than a year ago.
>>331685817
thats still cash grabbring
thanks for proving my point
>>331685576
>entire game is shit because muh graphics
kill yourself
>>331684239
Demon's Souls is great.
Dark Souls is great
Dark Souls II is okay for first 2 playthroughs, then it becomes a chore to play
Bloodborne is great.
One mediocre game out of 4 released so far is pretty damn good if you ask me. Also DaS3 looks great.
>>331684239
Because you're an insecure faggot who stops to like shit as soon as it becomes popular.
>>331685182
Because it's always fun to play.
>>331685937
What exactly is your point? Rereleases of games aren't new games, retard.
>>331684439
I dunno man. All I'm seeing is unbased hate for it. Mainly because its popular.
>>331684239
Blame namco.
They are the activision of japan.
>>331684439
Please tell me you're just some newfag trying to fit in.
When Dark Souls 2 released, the only complains were about the downgrade, but we had tons of great threads, and also fashon souls for quite some time.
Then after some time, the novelty fell off and /v/ started to see the game for what it truly was.
>>331684239
play king's field just emulate that shit
3 is near my friend, then all shall be right once more
>>331686212
its still cash grabbing
My point is that its not okay to cash grab
how dense are you
>>331686092
I never said or implied that. All I said was the game didn't live up to my expectations because I expected the lighting system to work.
>>331684432
So was bloodborne. And DS3 isn't out yet. DS2 is ultimately not that terrible, its just really lacking compared to the previous two titles.
Seems like a pretty good series to me. 3/4 great games is nothing to scoff at.
>>331686393
I thought your point was that Souls games are yearly releases. Rereleased games don't even factor into it.
>>331686671
Re released games do factor into it
what the hell is wrong with you
they made rereleases to make easy $ and comes out a year later than the original game
>>331686908
So? That doesn't make it a yearly franchise. Again, that's like saying Uncharted is a yearly franchise because 4 is coming out less than a year after the collection.
IT'S POPULAR SO IT'S SHIT
>>331684432
So 1 bad game that was somewhat fixed in a rerelease and the series is dead?
>>331685304
It wasn't as good as the first, but it wasn't a bad game and it improved the rolling, aside from some questionable hitboxes.
>>331684239
Because you niggers bought Dark souls 2 and all it's DLCs.
And skipped Bloodborne.
>so quickly
>seven (7) years
Most SNES franchises shit the bad much sooner.
>>331687605
The DLCs were pretty good though.
>>331686476
>I never said or implied that
>>331685028
>>331687330
pretty much sums up /v/s reaction to everything
>>331687695
Guess what will happen with Dark souls 3 then?
More DLCs at slightly lower quality.
it's all downhill from here.
>>331687780
You saw all the DLC already? Shit I wish I had sources like you.
/v/ needs to have poster IDs like some other boards. This samefag boogeyman is getting old as hell.
>>331684239
normies got hold of it
>DeS - great
>DS - great
>DS II - shit
>Bloodborne - great
DS III is going to be shit.
>>331689128
>Bloodborne - great
nope. shameborne doesn't deserve to be in the list as souls games
>>331689248
>shameborne
Pathetic meme to be honest with you.
>>331684239
