Now that /v/ is full of Republicans, is this man based for fighting degeneracy in video games?
yes because GTA IV is the worst in the series and needs to be purged
that's what /v/ forgets. before there were sjws there were right wing christians trying to ban anything violent.
ironically enough it was hillary clinton who was the one freaking out the most about GTA san andrea's hot coffee mod
If Donald Trump gets elected and happens to bring about a new wave of right wingers to lead this country how long will it take for /v/ to become liberal?
>>331483075
No
He was an SJW of his times
>>331485784
Zelda cycle.
>>331483075
People used to laugh at him and his ideas. Nowadays people applaude Anita Sarkeesian
>>331485784
I think 1-2 years.
Probably one.
>>331483075
Violence in gaming should stay, and we should regulate the sales of violent games to minors in a more strict manner. But being real, GTA is one of the lowest fucking quality series to exist today and is marketed to the very type of gamers who have ruined this industry.
>>331485784
>implying this place wouldn't be more of a trump dick sucking central than ever
>>331483606
>ban anything violent
Pretty sure he just wanted a stricter control so games like gta IV wouldn't be sold to children.
>>331486082
It only would for a few months.
>>331483606
the puritans who want to censor your videogames now are the same puritans who wanted to censor your videogames then.
That they've stopped wearing crosses round their necks and started shaving their pink-dyed hair to signify their allegiance isn't so important as the moral justification for their actions
'God says it's wrong!' is exactly the same reasoning as 'Feminism says it's wrong!'
>>331483075
No, because he didn't fucking play any of them before lying about then for his own gain.
When people compare him to Sarkeesian, they aren't being hyperbolic.
Okay.
Thompson wanted to ban violent video games. He was just as stupid as Anita, just focused in another subject. That said, he wasn't forcing an agenda like Anita and Brianna are. Jack is the lesser of two evils.
>>331486584
Just as bad as the rest of them.
>>331483075
>generalizing on multiple levels beause you're butthurt due to people not having the same political affiliation as you
>>331487771
So /pol/ ?
In the 90s, both guys and girls liked confident female characters and other "SJW shit"
During the 00s, after 9/11, all media got more conservative. It wasn't commented on, because it happened naturally. I'm sure you all noticed that media in the 00s really wasn't nearly as FUN as it was in the 90s or 80s. And also, during that time the news was always so serious that nobody would think of making as issue out of the portrayal of characters in fucking videogames of all things. But now things are calm again and people are ready for less conservative media again.
Problem is nowadays there's a whole lot of young people who literally grew up in the conservative years and never experienced those fun decades, and to them, this rise of "the liberal menace" is a threat, something scary and new, something that will ruin all "their" games, TV shows, and movies. The majority of active anti-SJWs are actually under 20.
Don't forget, there are people on 4chan who genuinely seem to think that there was no media ever made that appealed to liberals before tumblr showed up. How they'd react to older Star Trek episodes, I'd love to know.
>>331486082
It's bound to turn around sooner or later, you can always bet on the contrarianism here. Although I agree that /pol/ has became so rooted on its current form that it would take quite a bit of time for the change to happen.
>>331487875
>muh salty pole obsession
No, OP. You.
>>331487771
>>331485784
It took 4chan 2 years to stop sucking Obama dick.
>>331487771
>posting about, caring about, or discussing politics at all online
Learned my lesson.
>>331488000
You're brining up the sjw boogeyman out of nowhere. Are you okay?
Did your asshole get pounded by 4chan recently?
He probably wished the attention wouldn't be on gun control but the viddy games
>>331483075
All he wanted to do was restrict sales of M games to underage b&. The problem was he was a lunatic while doing it
>>331483075
Yes because kids shouldn't be playing such trite
The fag was only obsessively hounding two or three Rockstar games when there were hundreds of games that were just as or even more violent. The whole thing was a publicity stunt, and everyone except church-abiding gram-gram knew it.
Remember when Hillary and Jack were bros?
