>Paid Favorism
Since when is Mostly Positive a 58%?
That is mostly positive by definition.
>>330639710
>58%
>Not Mostly Positive
/v/ in charge of logic
?
1. Why are you caring about reviews?
2. Why are you caring about reviews for a AAA game?
>>330639783
>>330639795
>>330639819
>>330639904
>Ive never been on steam
file name related
>>330640081
What are you talking about?
See
>>330639819
It's 70%, not 58%
>>330640159
> not 58%
See
>>330640081
again retard
>>330640281
I don't understand what you are trying to say.
>>330640281
RETARD
E
T
A
R
D
>>330639710
>reviewing a game with only 30 hours played
Jesus Christ, you cannot get more retarded than that
This thread is horseshit you're retarded OP
I get what OPs saying.
68% on one game = mixed
68% on Tom Calancy = mostly positive
>WHEN IS OVER 50% MOSTLY POSITIVE??
>posts unrelated picture
>posts another unrelated picture
>f-fuckf-faces r-retards UR WRONG IM RIGHT
it's not bait
it's not a troll
OP is just genuinely retarded
>>330639710
Anon.
Anon.
Your math is fucked. For some reason you're treating positive as the total, instead of (positive+negative).
What you're doing: (Positive-Negative)/Positive
What you should be doing: Positive/(Positive+Negative)
OP isn't retard
Steam has changed the different ratings thresholds for this game
why do we hate this game /v/ros?
>>330640869
It's not fun
>>330640769
Except it's not 68% on Division, it's 70%. The lower threshold for "Mostly Positive" is 70%.
>>330640769
>>330640159
>>330640473
>>330640419
>>330640281
>>330640081
>>330639819
>>330639710
Where are you getting the 58% number from, that is literally the linchpin of your argument, and the only question anyone is asking.
guys
what's 6 - 6 * 6
>>330640852
It still functions the same as this list, which is from two years ago. You're just as dumb as the OP.
>>330639710
Why did he put two asterisks before the clarification at the bottom, when he never used any asterisk before? Does he have no idea how asterisks work?
>>330641417
-30
billion
>/v/ shits on The Division for weeks before it came out
>Came out and it's good
Has there ever been a time when /v/ didn't get blown out like this? Happens every time.
>>330641025
He fudged the math, as I mentioned in an earlier post. For some reason he compared negative vs positive rather than positive vs the total.
>>330641634
>it's good
Good one anon
>>330641417
Order of operation:
Parenthesis
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtract
6 - (6 * 6) = -30
>>330641417
30
>anons in charge of order of operation.
>>330641723
>anons in charge of subtracting a larger number from a smaller number
>>330641698
>S-sales and satisfied consumers don't matter
>I DO
>>330641817
Sales means good marketing
>>330641417
PLEASE EXCOOZ MY DEAR ANT SALIY
this is not a contest who can be the most cynical you know
>>330641025
He interpreted the "positive reviews" (7709) as if they were the total, so instead of doing
>positive / total
he calculated
>(positive - negative) / positive
>>330642203
In closing, OP is fucking retarded.
Anyone expected otherwise?
>>330641417
>>330641470
>>330641510
>>330641470
>>330641510
cant believe im sharing a board with such dumbasses
>>330639710
your screenshot clearly shows it's not 58%
go troll elsewhere
95 - 99% : Overhwelmingly Positive
94 - 80% : Very Positive
80 - 99% + few reviews: Positive
70 - 79% : Mostly Positive
40 - 69% : Mixed
20 - 39% : Mostly Negative
0 - 39% + few reviews: Negative
0 - 19% : Very Negative
0 - 19% + many reviews: Overwhelmingly Negative
>>330639710
>7709 positive
>3289 negative
That's 71% positive, you lying shit
>>330641817
A satisfied consumer is not one that has just bought the game.
It is the one that has played the game in its entirety and then thinks that he does not rue buying it.
There might be millions of satisfied customers in the making..., there also might be millions of people slowly realizing that they have been had by ubisoft marketing, AGAIN.
This question is pending.
