I was going to pick this game up today and am glad I saw this video first.
https://youtu.be/UYGWM0ojv2g
embarassing
>>329580109
Who cares, it looks and plays good as fuck
>>329580109
Either you're begging for views or have crafted an OP pretending to agree with this video to start some kind of shit flinging.
Either way OP is fake and gay.
>>329580254
I am perfectly happy and fine with a stable 30fps game; there's no world where 20fps "plays good as fuck" as you say. Sorry pal, just not true.
>>329580592
I don't even understand your post, Digital Foundry is a resource for game performance. What is there to "agree" with? I agree, it's inexcusable to have severe performance issues.
>>329580109
>giving a shit about a few framerate fuck-ups in certain areas of a game
this framerate meme needs to die already
>>329581167
>this framerate meme needs to die already
60fps is a meme, 30fps is a standard
The game plays beautifully, stop being a bitter faggot about some arbitrary number that does nothing to make the game worse than it was before the HD remaster.
>>329581331
Ocarina of Time was 14 fps and it's fine.
People who can't play games because of framerates should be considered disabled. It should only impede your ability to play the game if it falls below 10 fps, like Star Fox on the SNES. And even then it's possible if you're not a petty retard.
>>329581730
>>329580109
Oh no :(
>>329580109
Who cares about that? It's boring and scant on content.
>>329581730
oot was 20 in gameplay, 30 in pause menu, 60 in file select
learn yourself, tool
>>329580109
I-I-it's a throwback to Ocarina of Time, see it never goes below 20 fps.
That's strange, I'm a framerate whore and I didn't notice WWHD as 30FPS. I usually notice it instantly, but I haven't played much of the game to be quite honest, family.
>>329580109
I got this back at launch and the frame rate was my only compliant. I don't remember bombs having such huge frame drops in the gc version. why'd they do that?
>>329580109
>Nintendo can't even get 60 FPS for a port of a gamecube game
>>329583184
it dips noticeably in parts of the game that had no dips in SD (particularly the boss fights) despite having no real increase in graphical fidelity outside of the new lighting
>>329580109
I agree the framerate dips suck shit, they're inexcusable for a remaster to have.
However, it's up to you whether you feel this hinders too much on the experience of the game itself, the framedrops are rare during normal gameplay. Still pissed me off, though.
Regardless, it's obvious OP just wanted a bait thread for a game he likely hasn't even played. /v/ is retarded though so this'll probably reach bump limit anyway
>>329583336
>>329583391
Having to render at 1080p affects performance. MH3U has slight slowdowns despite being an upres 3DS game because of it.
>>329583545
i understand that, but perhaps if such a high resolution causes framerate issues, maybe it shouldn't be so high
The lighting isn't even that good in this. It makes Link look like he's made out of clay every time he opens a chest.
>>329583713
Then what would be the point of remastering? Slight framedrops versus much better image quality is a trade that's fine to do. As long as the drops aren't severe and constant, of course.
>>329583452
I had and played the original on GameCube at release, that's gone now and since it was a game I enjoyed, I would have liked to revisit it. This fps revelation is disappointing enough to put me back on the fence though.
>>329581331
Fps drops have been common since the dawn of video games. If you haven't accepted a tiny frame drop during crowded combat scenes and the like, you're a fuckong baby.
Frames only matter in competetive games and movies, they have zero effect on how much fun you're having unless you're a 30 year old man child who gets butt blasted over the smallest problems in gaming due to the fact that gaming is all you have in life.
>>329583850
agreed, actually. didn't think it through until after i made my post
>>329580109
>trusting Nintendo
Sold my WiiU after seeing all the bullshit they have planned. You can be Nintendo's Job if you want, but I'm out.
>>329580109
actually what they claim is happening in that video is not real and does not happen in the game
>it's a "let's hate a videogame company consolewars thread"
>>329580109
Seriously are console even trying anymore? This generation is the shittiest in years
>We will never get the HD game changes in the standard looking game without bloom and shit everywhere
>>329583895
>Fps drops have been common since the dawn of video games. If you haven't accepted a tiny frame drop during crowded combat scenes and the like, you're a fuckong baby.
If a game drops below 60 fps frequently, to say, 45 fps due to hardware specs or poor optimization, I'd prefer to lock it at 30 for a smoother, enjoyable experience. However, there is no recourse for dipping below 30. Having below 30 fps is not conducive to responsive gameplay and hinders to experience no matter the genre. Even turn-based RPGs, it's just jarring to go below that 30 standard.
>unless you're a 30 year old man child who gets butt blasted over the smallest problems in gaming due to the fact that gaming is all you have in life.
How did you peg me so well? Not even being sarcastic.
>PS4 game has minor fps drops
LOL FUCK SONY SHIT GAME UNPLAYABLE REEE
>gamecube port on wii u has 20fps
>WHO CARES ABOUT FPS, IT'S FUN
nintenshills damage control is real
>want dat sick copy of WWHD with no piss colored art
>the game is still $50
Fuck, dude.
>>329585673
Better jump on it now, else you'll scant see one in the wild again.
>>329585870
I've seen them since last year. Do you think Nintendo would be dumb enough to stop printing them?
...don't answer that.
>>329584474
This is the first new generation in years, retard.
Those frame rate drops are crazy though and never happened to me. Maybe because I didn't play at 1080p?
>>329586047
>Do you think Nintendo would be dumb enough to stop printing them?
They already did, and always stop printing their games after making 300 copies
>>329580109
Literally every 3D Zelda games on console run at 30fps or under. At least the game run at native 1080p.
>>329580646
Just because you autistic retard can't enjoy games anymore. Go check your newest benchmark and order your 500$ GPU to play butchered shitports.
>>329586628
>this is the go-to defense when someone snubs shit video performance of a digital video interactive work
wew
>>329580109
When viewed on a graph, the fps rises and dips just like the waves of the ocean. Wonder if that was intentional.
>>329586780
It's funny, they prefer insulting pc users than admitting the company they support is cucking them. First step is denial lads
>>329580109
Yeah, so what?
Just emulate the Gamecube version on Dolphin if you're so concerned about counting the frame rate.
>>329586328
Well fuck. I guess I'll invest in one of those Best Buy Gaeber Klub memberships so I at least save $10 on whatever I get.
>>329580109
Who actually notices this autistic shit?
I didn't even know about FPS til I got a PC last year.I hate 60fps and realistic graphics because it gives me that creepy uncanny valley feel.it just doesn't feel like vidya games.
>>329580109
If OP actually cared about this shit that much he wouldn't even own a wii u.
>>329583993
>Sold my WiiU
Sure you did, buddy.
>>329580109
The GameCube version also slows down while sailing. Especially around the light rings.
Don't know how they didn't fix that.
>>329580109
Fast sail makes this the objectively superior game.
Now that they can load the areas faster there is no reason to deal with such slow sailing
This wouldn't happen if it wasn't for that ugly ass HDR.
>>329587525
Sure did! Probably going to replace it with an xbone
>>329587372
>Who actually notices this autistic shit?
Gee, I don't know, anyone with half a brain?
What do you think is happening here at 1min?
https://youtu.be/UYGWM0ojv2g?t=1m2s
Is that bullet time? Are we matrix-mode now?
>>329588363
I can't notice anything
>>329588547
Alright, you actually did manage a giggle out of me.
>>329588363
It's obviously bullet time. It's supposed to get you hyped
>>329580109
What the fuck they changed the cover art?
>>329589815
The reprint has a full color box, no more gold covers.
>>329580646
>implying this video isn't cherry picking the few moments it drops below 30
>implying you're not an autistic piece of shit
>>329590215
It's not really "cherry-picking" because they didn't intentionally try to create a false perception by ignoring certain evidence and highlighting others, because they outright state the video is worst-case performance.
>Performance analysis of The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker HD. It's a remaster with 30fps in mind; note that this video highlights the worst case scenarios across the game, rather than an average level of performance.
>>329590589
You literally just wrote they aren't cherry-picking, then proceeded to show that the owners of the video make a disclaimer that they are indeed cherry picking.
>>329590589
So it's not cherry picking because the video has a disclaimer saying the scenes are cherry picked?
Op's opinion is irrelevant. /thread
