How can people even play games below 60fps?
Even 50 fps looks like a fucking slideshow.
Even dips from 60fps to 55 fps are noticeable.
>>323465927
Dips are always noticeable, that's why I'd rather have a stable 30 than fluctuating 40-60.
>>323465927
I don't have autism
I rember when Crysis came out and people were honestly saying that the "revolutionary" motion blur meant that 20fps looked the same as 60fps and that 20fps was playable.
my cousin literally said used the line "our eyes can't see 60fps" . His family also tried to convince me that "Hindsight" meant looking behind you so they're probably idiots.i have no confidence and didn't defend myself in either situation
>>323465927
You get used to it and after a while you don't really notice or care.
>>323466171
why not a stable 40?
unless you use vsync in which case fuck you
>>323466267
NEVER FUCKING REPLY TO ME AGAIN UNLESS YOU'RE CONTRIBUTING TO THE THREAD
>>323466267
au contraire
>>323465927
I've played games where the FPS dropped down to below 10(turn based games so kept playing) and had no problem. I just don't have autism and/or browse /r atheism and master race.
SHOT THROUGH THE HEART
Because only autistic PCucks care about that shit. 60fps is only important in fast paced action games. 30fps is fine for everything else.
>>323467010
>Not using Vsync
Enjoy your tearing.
>>323467147
why lie?
I played a game with 30fps and it game me cancer
>>323467286
And you your 5000ms input lag
>>323468128
No input lag at 60fps
>>323465927
Did you enjoy games last gen? Enough said.
What I want to know is how people can't enjoy 30fps? PS4 runs various games including AAA at 60fps but how come this supposed 'gold standard' doesn't turn us into negative elitist assholes? I really want to know why that is?
>>323468128
>not using adaptive Vsync
>being an AMDcuck
>>323468294
>Did you enjoy games last gen
Pc gaming has been 60fps since the late 90s
>>323468591
I said did you enjoy last-gens games which PC missed out on entirely with exception of some ports like DD
>>323467010
>why not a stable 40
I think anon was just trying to illustrate the point that stability at an exceptionally low framerate of 30 is still much more beneficial than having your fps jump sporadically from 40-60. Of course it's optimal to achieve stability at the highest framerate your computer can handle.
>>323468708
Any worthwhile console game got a pc port
>>323468708
No, you actually said "Do you enjoy games last gen?".
How do you cap your fps at 30 instead of having it crash between 30 and 60 constantly?
>>323466529
>i have no confidence and didn't defend myself in either situation
Which makes you as much of an idiot as them.
>>323469094
You can force it in your driver settings.
>>323468979
PC gaming is not a console, it doesn't participate in gen race
>>323468975
Why do you lie to yourself?
>>323469094
depends on nvidia or amd
also rtss/afterburner is good too
also if you're struggling to get good frames, and you play @ 1080p or higher, try doing what consoles do and lower your res to 900p, but keeping the frames high
Dumb people can't process information as fast. They think something like 40 fps isn't bad because they literally do not see the difference between 60 and 30. Their brain doesn't process the information fast enough for them to notice.
This also explains why the people who argue for 30 fps are really fucking dumb and can't come up with a decent argument to save their life.
>>323465927
Simple.
you just get used to them, anon.
>>323465927
I can handle dips to 40fps, but not any further. What makes me annoyed the most is stuttering or screen-tearing.
>>323466267
this
>>323468916
Yeah, that was what I meant. Obviously it's always preferable to have as high stable FPS as possible, but if I for some reason had to choose between those two choices, the stable but low FPS wins.
>>323473292
Yeah, tearing can be fucking atrocious in some games. So bad that it completely ruins your focus on the events that are happening on the screen.
>>323465927
>How can people even play games below 60fps?
by not being an elitist meme loving fucker, thats why, thats how normal people can play videogames without complaints
>falling into the 60FPS meme master cuck
>2016
anon pls
>>323473764
One game I noticed the most screen-tearing in was Rainbow Six Vegas 2, that and the no FoV slider makes it a bit hard to bare but god damn do I love that game.
>>323465927
Just as with anything else, you've been spoilt. You can't accept less than a smooth 60 because you've not had to deal with anything less for a significant amount of time.
If you're stuck on a toaster and played at 20-25 for years or the occasional 30 on older games, you'll love a stable 30 and 40/50 will be gorgeous.
>>323473818
Nice buzzwords, stop posting.
How can people even play games below 120fps?
Even 75 fps looks like a fucking slideshow.
Even dips from 75fps to 60 fps are noticeable.
After Dragon's Dogma, I feel I can handle any frame rate. Screen tearing is worse imo. That shit really brings my knickers to a twist.
>playing fallout 4
>hovers around 45-50 fps because old computer
>get to Corvega plant
>25-30fps
holy shit it, it was so jarring that it was nearly unplayable.
>>323467010
Stable 40 causes jitter because the frames don't match up evenly with most monitors' refresh rates. With gsync/freesync it's not an issue though
>>323465927
>he plays at 60fps
>not 144fps
Get a load of this casual.
