Philippa Eilhart did nothing wrong.
>>323156829
Not even philippa eilhart would agree with that.
>>323157496
She had the North's best interests at heart.
She couldn't have done more wrong if she tried.
Should've kept her eyes on the prize
every woman in witcher 2 has a fucking manface
>>323158457
I'm glad someone else noticed this
>>323156829
Well at least she gets her sweet revenge in the third game bykilling Radovid
>that scene where you walk in on her spanking Cynthia on the bed
>>323158630
Everytime I come into these threads I spoil myself
>>323158814
Geralts face as he walks in is priceless.
>>323156829
Hated her in the books, cheered and laughed when hereyes got riped out of their sockets
Problem i had: I hated Radovid more than her otherwise i wouldhave killed her
>>323158457
>>323158589
How about you 2 weeaboos go back to your loli porn?
>>323157659
Not saying that she would not say that she did "the wrong thing" only that mistakes were obviously made.
>>323159202
Or maybe ignore that janky mess of a sentence and lets say that having her eyes gouged out could have been avoided.
>>323159202
Because Sile was an idiot and got outplayed because she underestimated the walking mountain that is Letho.
I hope you guys "saved" Sile so she would eventually get raped and tortured
whatever
>>323159434
Everything got raped and tortured by terrible writing.
>>323159434
>save Sile because I still like the sorceresses
>play witcher 3
I should have known. Even Letho tells you at the end of Witcher 2 what will happen to her.
I don't even remember any of these shitty characters.
>>323156829
She's a huge cunt in the books and in the games but canonically the Lodge wins and is revered as matron saints akin to goddesses in the far future.
>>323159641
I don't think Philippa shows up at all if you go with the Broche route
I want to fuck her eye socket
Did you kill him?
>>323159881
>Roach
>Not Broverth
I shiggy diggy
>>323160058
No, but for some reason it didn't recognize it in my save so he never showed up.
>>323160146
Gotta find him in a sidequest.
>Saskia never turns up again in 3
What a fucking waste.
>>323160138
Every single Squirrel is a cunt to Geralt until he goes Iroverth route
Meanwhile Roche is the reason why Geralt isn't being hung from Temerian gallows
>>323160421
squirrels are cunts but iorveth is a bro
>>323160421
But what about muh Temeria, Geralt?
>>323160806
Laugh all you want, Temeria will rise again
>>323160138
>>323160421
>Like Roche better
>Like Iorveth's path better
fug
>>323160720
Iorveth is a shitty bandit until his path
She did one thing wrong: didn't sit on my dick.
>>323156829
except fucking up making a puppet not seeing simple physiological changes in Radovid without trying to prevent it
>>323160806
This image is uncanny
>>323160961
She's a lesbian.
>>323160917
It's the opposite for me
>>323160421
This has always been the problem in W1 and 2
There is no reason why Geralt would ever side with the Squirrels as they are so blatantly evil and constantly antagonise him and do shit Geralt wouldn't like
They stop once you join them, but realistically from an in world perspective Geralt would be insane to do so
>>323161330
He doesn't join the Squirrels or actively help them in doing the things he disagrees with (killing innocent people).
The reason I imagine he'd side with Iorveth is because he is leaving immediatly to Vergen where Geralt wants to go and find Triss.
Roche is fucking around in Flotsam for about three days.
>>323160917
>Iorveth is a shitty bandit until his path
No. He is more like commandante Che, his career ended the same way.
Huh, just came to me - Iortheth is pasta of Chegevara.
>>323161478
Iorveth threatened to kill him and very nearly did so
His previous experiences with that faction involve blatant terrorism and murder, and Geralt is canonically one of the biggest moralfags in the setting
There's just no way he would do it
>>323161330
>There is no reason why Geralt would ever side with the Squirrels
will you pay attention to the game you fucking play?
Iortheth - you pursue Triss
Roche - you forget friends and pursue clearing your name
>>323161568
and non the less, he sympathizes with them all the time, mostly in the books
game is more fluid in that regard and let's you do what you want
and come on, Geralt being threatened by so many people that he had to/agreed to work with after it's nothing new
>>323161590
Yes but the point is that at that point Iorveth has already had a team of archers about to kill Geralt and appears to be little more than a bandit/terrorist, so it would be incredibly foolish for him to trust him at that point
>>323161860
>trust
it's a big word nobody ever said in that game.
As a person, geralt aside, that want to help his friend i would spit on moral, previous engagements etc. and would follow the way that gets me to said friend faster.
Plus Geralt never promised Roche anything except finding real killers.
>>323158356
underrated post