>you live in a CURRENT YEAR where a remake of Twilight Princess is a thing that's happening
Where did the time go?
Time goes by faster and faster as you get older.
Shut the fuck up and deal with it.
It's a port, not a remake.
>>322837391
Anon, do you know what a remake is?
>>322837391
>remake
if it was a remake it wouldn't look like dogshit
well, actually it's on the wii u so it would.
It means nothing.
Nintendo will be remaking Skyward Sword in two or three years.
>Pokemon Diamond/Pearl are next in line for remakes
help
>>322837391
>remake
try again
>>322837391
>>322837547
It could be considered a "definitive edition" to be honest. As of what we've seen so far, the changes are not on the scale of the 3D remakes of the N64 games and the HD remake of the Wind Waker. This could change of course, but don't count on it.
>>322837851
Most Wii U games look fucking amazing, so I'm not sure what you're going on about.
>>322837993
>nitendrones
>>322837927
If they get rid of the candyass MCor just stick with Platinum's designit'll be OK.
>>322837927
>worried that the best pokemon games will get a remake
why
>>322837927
After that B/W
PANiC
>>322838049
Name one Nintendo game on the Wii U that looks like shit, because greentexting the name of one of your bogeymans isn't an argument.
>>322838307
Xenoblade X
>>322838325
It looks awesome.
>>322838156
But those remakes came out about six years ago.
>>322837851
Graphics don't really dictate how good a game is...
>>322838530
I hope that picture isn't meant to support your argument. It looks like a 2007 PS3 game.
But it's all about the artstyle right?
>>322837901
>older games available on newer handhelds and consoles
>this is somehow a bad thing
>>322838663
If it's a port they do. There's literally nothing else going for it.
>>322838739
that's not true. I have Dragon's Dogma and X and DD looks much worse
they're both fun games though
>>322838827
It is a bad thing when they cost the price of brand new games these days. At least Sony's ports include 3 games for the price of one and have good visual upgrades and I fucking hate Sony.
>>322837391
this game has the biggest bullshot since the wii u was announced.
>>322837901
The data is missing the snes remake/rerelease of Super Mario Brothers 1-3
>>322838530
>>322838739
At least post decent screens fucking hell
>>322838980
>that's not true
>i have one ps3 game that represents all others and proves you are wrong
Christ.
>>322839040
if i'm not mistaken, all nes games cost 5 bucks, all snes games cost 8 bucks, and n64 games cost 10 (or was it 12)
they used to rerelease metroid and zelda and shit for the gba as well, and they were way more expensive than that.
>>322838739
>it's 2016
>Twilight Princess will be 10 years old in November
2006 feels like yesterday...
>>322839272
Those GBA NES ports were like $20, weren't they?
>>322839214
I was giving you an example of a nice looking ps3 game from that time era.
control your autism, ma'am
>>322839205
>literal copyright in bottom right
It's a bullshot mate. The game looks nowhere near that.
>>322839358
yeah those were overpriced as fuck, probably because of physical shit.
>>322839272
>and n64 games cost 10
We're not talking about Virtual Console emulation, we're talking rereleases.
>>322839442
>
>>322839442
have you even played it?
>>322839732
Yes. I have it and love it. But its graphics are fucking garbage.
>remake OoT
>Remake MM
>remake WW
>Remake TP
>Make zelda albw
>make stacking zelda
>make 2 hyrule warriors
And STILL haven't released Zellda U. Fucking development hell. Time to get rid of anouma
>>322837391
>Wind Waker HD completely changes the graphics and runs on a new engine
>Twilight Princess HD is literally the same graphics but the resolution was bumped up just a bit
Literally the worst remake ever.
>>322839820
>remake OoT
literally came out before skyward sword
>>322839624
I was replying to the bullshit chart at the top of the thread that counts times old games have been ported for some insane reason.
>>322839898
You're giving WWHD too much credit.
It was equally shit. The environments and character models were unchanged, most of the textures were unchanged. The only difference is now the lighting isn't cellshaded but just bloom.
It's not a good "remake" at all.
Game also fucking runs at 30fps. Which is unacceptable for a GC port.
>>322839793
they're far from garbage, unless you put the camera as close as you can to a wall. It could definitely benefit from more complicated textures and shit but it looks better than any game I can think of from the last console gens
>mfw the dev team that made Funky Barn is handling the Twilight Princess port
>>322837526
It doesn't go faster, it's just that your perception of it goes faster. When you're 4 years old a year is 25% of your life, when you're 25 a year is 4%.
There was less time between SM64 and the DS remake yet this will probably have far less extras.
>>322840084
That's because the game engine is programmed to run only at that framerate. If you mod it to run at 60 fps the game doesn't work. Also, some of your claims are frankly not true. Almost all of the textures are changed. There would be no reason to change the character models and environments, so I'm not sure why you're even mentioning that. And what exactly is cel-shaded "lighting"?
Your pathetic, unsourced argument would fly with most /v/ users, but not me.
>>322838663
>Graphics don't really dictate how good a game is
>a fucking REMAKE doesn't need to have good graphics
Them why not fucking pay 20 bucks for the original instead of 60 for the exact same shit?
>>322839925
One fucking thing does not deffer the fact that it's in dev hell
>>322840894
skyward sword was also in development hell
>>322839320
seriously, what the fuck. I remember standing outside all night waiting for the Wii.
If I knew Nintendo would get more disappointing each year after that I probably wouldnt have bothered
>>322841312
As time passes you get more cynical. All the shit I used to love seems like it's getting worse
>>322838325
As much as I love XCX, this guy is right, it does look extremely lacklustre in comparison to current PS4/PC games.
Even late PS3/360 games look better than the wiiu.
This is a fact.
>>322838827
Hii
I dont understand anything
I know Nintendo hates putting in any effort into things but I think it would be pretty cool if they remade a gameboy era game for the WiiU.
Would be interesting to see the world recreated in 3D
>>322841030
How long did TP take? Remember the early shots of it being a "realistic" OOT remake? Remember the early shots where it looked even darker and that one fucking promotional shot with the fire golem thing that was everywhere for years?
>>322837391
Never played TP so I'm looking forward to this. Plus my Wii U is hacked now so it's not like it'll cost me anything
>>322841917
it must be hard for you to not understand anything and deal with things day to day.
my heart goes out to you, anon.
>>322842154
didn't it take like 3 years?
I remember being bummed that wind waker didn't look badass like I wanted it to but news of a more realistic zelda came quick
