it's dirt cheap now, get both

Depends, do you want a good post-apocalyptic rpg or a good medieval fantasy rpg?

do you want a more sandboxy game or a more adventurey game?

>>322524891
new vegas

>>322525795
do both have any meaningful choices?

>>322524891

Witcher 3 is better, but New Vegas is different in a good way altogether. I think New Vegas is deeper cause you can build your own story, but Witcher 3's is more fun because the quests in it are more varied, have more outcomes and multiple arcs and branches to them. Witcher 3's quests also have cut scene and more cinematic vibrancy.

Some may bitch and say cut scenes are evil, but I still like them. It's just that New Vegas goes to the far end of not having them at all.

>>322524891
I love both games but I think New Vegas has more replay value

New Vegas

>>322526424
Did you play nv? Theres way more branching quest s in that game

Have you played earlier entries in the Witcher series? If not, New Vegas.

>>322525795
fallout nv is post-post apocalypse

>>322526771

They don't change much. Faction hates you here, faction likes you there. There aren't more branching paths in New Vegas than Witcher 3. In Witcher 3, villages and more can be destroyed. Landscapes change and more, it's more impactful than freeing a city from the legion or letting them kill everyone in it.

>>322527141
every town in nv is affected and given some closure in the ending

>>322527441
>every town in nv is affected and given some closure in the ending

Yeah, but like you said, that's in the ending. Both have good branching quests that open or close other quests depending on your choices, BUT Witcher 3 does it in a AAA budget way, by showing you the repercussions of your actions.

People hung from trees, people burnt at the stake, tied to stone on islands, human eating monsters left to wonder in peace. Witcher 3 just does it better. It's totally different because it is the here and now. Not just a blurb on a passing text box telling you the ultimate outcome of your actions.