IF YOUR GAME DOES NOT RUN AT 60 FRAMES PER SECOND
IT'S
SHIT
>>322090790
you're supposed to make it rhyme, newfriend
Shitposting aside, there's no good reason to lock a game at 30fps. More fluid motion always equals a better experience.
This goes double for 3D first/third person games, 2D sidescrollers and anything where large portions of the screen are in motion at any given moment.
>>322090790
SHOT THROUGH THE HEART
AND YOU'RE TO BLAME
30 FPS
MEANS SHIT GAME
His goty was undertale which runs at less than 30fps
>>322090790
>>322090790
Unless it's Undertale
>>322090960
Am I the only one that hates 30 fps?
I mean a game can be 35-40 and I'll be alright but 30 just feels choppy as fuck
>>322091098
But it was Overwatch, anon!
>>322090960
Basically. I'll never understand why people defend PC games with 30 FPS locks, or any FPS lock. Most well made PC games/ports allow you to set whatever kind of frame limit you want.
Want to play the game at 30 FPS? Do it.
Want to play the game at 60 FPS? Do it.
Want to play the game at 144 FPS? Do it.
There is literally no disadvantage to this.
>>322091219
Playing games at 30 gives me a headache, I don't know how consolefags put up with it
>>322090790
He's right you know.
>>322091234
nah TotalAssCancer has 2 Number 1 games.
That's how lists work right? :^)
>>322091269
35 is shit too but It doesn't feel as bad as 30 and I can handle it. Once I tried locking it at 30 and it felt like a blurry mess when I moved the camera. Sony should aim for 40-45 fps to meet it halfway
>>322090790
Cancer is eating him alive at 24fps
>>322090960
>there's no good reason to lock a game at 30fps
I wonder about this.
Considering the number of games that have locked framerates and are completely broken when it's unlocked I wonder if maybe, just maybe, there is a perfectly legitimate technical reason for locking the framerate. Physics engines in particular seem to really hate a variable tick rate.
>He can't play DOOM at 700+ FPS
>>322091269
TVs are different than monitors so the low framerate doesn't look as bad as it does on a monitor. It's why you get people constantly claiming "I don't notice anything lol doesn't matter" but after playing at 60 for a long time and playing the same game on my friend's ps3 it's painfully obvious and the game just feels slower overall
>>322091269
fighting games, sports games, racing games, I need 60 fps
first/third person shooters, rpg, platformers, hack n slash and beat em up, shmups most single player games I prefer 30 fps
>>322091583
That's part of what I mean by "no good reason". Source could do it in 2004, there's no good reason modern engines shouldn't be capable of it. Lots of bad reasons, though.
re4 was better at 30
>>322091850
>Lots of bad reasons, though.
I supposed that's a matter of opinion.
The major reason, at least in regards to consoles which inherently means PC now because everything is a port from consoles, is you get better much better graphics when the game operates at 30Hz instead of 60Hz. As irritating as you may find it it seems the majority of people will take better graphics over 60fps.
>>322092325
I still don't know why they don't let the player choose, like with the TLOU port. Just throw in a toggle for 30/60 so people can pick what they want.
>>322092325
>better graphics
Do you even look at the games you're playing? They still look like last gen shit.
The only reason for 30fps is because consoles are weak as shit and can't function any higher than that, and still fucking manage dip below even that.
>game doesn't run at 60 fps
>quits life
>>322090790
>get used to 144fps monitor
>try playing console game
>gives me a headache
I mean it went away after a while but holy shit. It look so bad.
>>322091219
No I fucking hate 30 fps for any kind of fast paced game. It's fine for shit like Crusader Kings or really anything turnbased, though.
If you make a first person game and it's at 30 fps it makes me want to fucking vomit, holy shit.
