Did anyone ever get inclement weather? You'd have to play the game day in and day out to get this shit. It does look tight as fuck though.
do people still play reach?
>>322074276
Well probably, they have it for xbone now
>>322072940
It actually really didn't take that long to get.
I had pestilence and I don't remember spending an insane amount of time playing
>>322074276
Reach is still the best PvP Halo.
>>322074958
I might go for inclement once the dogshit framerate gets fixed
>>322072940
I had it.
>>322074591
runs like fucking ass, so no they dont
>>322072940
I had a friend who was the biggest halo fan i knew and was saving up for Incliment Weather from release. He got about half way and then Bungie reset his credits because he was getting them too fast and they thought he was boosting/hacking.
From that day he renounced Halo and Bungie forever
>>322077556
He could've just took it up with Bungie support instead of quitting entirely like a dumbass.
No, I got pestilence instead because I thought it was cooler.
>>322077520
It's not. OP is one of those people who says he prefers console gaming over his hadron colider stephen hawking edition i9 gtx990.
>>322072940
Hit Inheritor and unlocked everything before Halo 4 came out.
Heart Attack is still the best effect.
>>322077994
well fuck me
>>322072940
>that name
What are you doing with your life OP
>>322075607
ODST had the best firefight and Halo CE had the best campaign
>>322078417
H1 also had the best multiplayer.
>>322078457
No, Halo 3 did.
>>322078596
>>322078417
>Halo CE had the best campaign
>there are people this delusional
CE has the worst campaign, easily. it hasn't aged well.
It has a ton of levels that are endless repeated corridors, which while standard for the time of it's release, don't cut it now.
A lot of the wide open levels it has, while a novelty then, aren't handled well in comparison today: mission 2 is so big you have to drive for like a minute straight from one battle to the next in a mostly empty field. The later halo games still had expansive levels to some degree but were bettr about keeping it a reasonable size, and actually filling the space in.
Also, the latter half of CE is almost the second half in reverse, and there's much less enemy and visual variety in the campaign, I got tired of fighting the covenant in the same sorts of spaces a good mission or 2 before the flood showed up, and I got tired of them 1-2 missions before the end of the game.
Also, the library.
>>322078457
>>322078596
>implying any one halo game had the best multi when that means a ton of different things
2 has the best maps and play on default settings. Reach has the most ways to play with firefight + normal multi + SP MM, forge world, and tons of gametype options. 5 has the best weapon balance.
>>322079069
Halo 2's maps were all flat, symmetrical, and boring.
Default settings meaning SMG starts? Because that's a laugh and a half.
>>322077556
I wish I'd given up on Halo before playing 4. I never liked the armor powers or whatever in Reach, but 4 was even worse in that regard. Didn't feel like Halo anymore.
>>322079154
>Halo 2's maps were all flat, symmetrical, and boring.
What? Halo 2 had way more asymetrical maps then CE, and I don't think it had any less then later titles, and they are more vertical then 3/reach/4 maps for the most part, being on par with CE's and only below 5 in terms of vertaclity. you'll have to explain boring.
>Default settings meaning SMG starts? Because that's a laugh and a half.
Both SMG starts and BR starts are garbage in 2 for sure, 2 had shit weapon balance, but what I meant by that is I feel it has the best core-gameplay given normal modes vs customs or fun bullshit stuff like invasion or warzone.
>>322079154
I played Halo: CE MP on PC for like 4 years straight, nearly ALL of the maps are flat and symmetrical.
Also who fucking cares about the rest of 2's maps (even though you're wrong) when this bad boy existed
>>322079695
SMG was one of the best weapons in the game. Dual SMGs tore people apart at medium-close range.
>>322075607
Didn't reach have loadouts? That shit was awful.
>>322081029
Yep, Reach was overrated as fuck.
Invasion on Spire is the pinnacle of Halo multiplayer
>>322081093
I thought the single player campaign was fine, but loadouts is a horrible thing. I want to play Halo, not cowadooty.
>>322077693
>Bungie support
Nigga. That's a funny joke. You're a funny guy man.
>>322072940
>halo reach
>that gamertag
>cant even level himself up in a system where you have to just play to get xp
oh god, please go back to whatever hellhole you came from
>>322080994
>nearly ALL of the maps are flat and symmetrical.
>lying
>on the internet
>>322081394
>lying
It's true, though.
Did they ever end up remaking blood gulch on the following games? I think there was a shitty version in Reach.
>>322081609
>blood gulch is the only halo map
>>322081262
>>322081093
>>322081029
You could select an armor ability in reach but that's it, not your weapons or grenades or anything, except in invasion where there were preset classes but invasion was it's own gametype and it actually worked well there.
4 had CoD style loadouts and even a sort of killstreak system and perks, which was awfulbut I didn't mind the gun selection too much, god forbid I get to spawn with a carbine instead of a BR
>>322081695
That's not what I said. I was just asking, calm your dick.
>>322081809
>not your weapons or grenades or anything
Bullshit, yes you can. Both perks and weapons were included in the loadouts.
>>322082121
>>322082203
In reach, not in normal game modes. For certain custom ones and invasion you had preset selections, yeah, but that wasn't the default.
4 is when the default modes had it and you could actually make your own sets.
