Is Black Ops 3 last-gen actually that bad, or is it just a graphical downgrade?
I only ask because my PC is weak and I don't have a PS4/Xbone yet, plus I just want to indulge in a guilty pleasure of rooty tooty point and shooty
>>321739637
kill yourself
It doesn't even come with a campaign.
>>321739637
they dropped the 60 fps target and went for 30, which isn't even that consistent apparently
>>321739637
It is multi-player only. Period. No campaign. It may have zombies--google that shit, I do not know off the top of my head. The reviews it received were low because of the missing content. I would wager that it is "fine" if you were good with the previous COD 360 entries.
>>321739637
The wii version of black ops 1 is better
>>321739825
Has zombies.
No local multiplayer. No campaign. Struggles with framerate mostly in the low 30s.
>>321739637
It's now 30 bucks on Amazon. If you absolutely must play it--and your PC is truly too shit and you are not getting a PS4/XBONE in the next few months--might be worth it but it still seems like a bad deal. Regardless.
I know it's campaign-free but does it at least run stably? Or is it worse than the Wii CoDs?
Basically, is it still playable?
>>321739637
>playing a shooter on a console
LOL.
>>321741681
>playing CoD on PC
>>321741681
>Videogames
>PCuck
>>321741681
even i know you shouldn't play cod on pc and im a retard
you are dumber than i am
>>321739825
No DLCs I heard.
So you'll get stuck with Shadows of Evil zombie map
>>321741107
>>321741860
From what I've experienced, the game runs decent on 360 but you'll experience random crashes/freezes, and God help you if you try to find a Shadows of Evil match online. Last time I tried it searched for half an hour and then started a solo game.
>>321739637
Obviously worse graphics on last gen
Multiplayer only
and some of the maps are edited I think. I believe they replaced tanks in maps with cars and vans.
>>321741681
>playing cod on PC
wew lad
