Why isn´t he in smash? I know the game is still trash regardless of any quantity. But still.
>>321209767
He.is just a snowman, he has no spark that makes him unique.
>>321209917
Name that snowman that is in tr4sh.
Oh wait, you can't
Starbound is fucking godawful why do you still talk about it
>>321210242
Fine then,might as well just put frosty the snowman in.Being a snowman is not enough.
>>321210896
You've got no reason. Your reasoning is almost soccereye tier.
>>321211059
No reason?!Fine then, tell me what is so great about this guy.If you do then I'll tell you someone who I think should be in smash bros.
>>321211914
I don't care for Samurai's drone's opinion
>>321209767
LITERALLY WHO?
For real, who the fuck is that?
>>321212012
Ok.Apparently you do not understand what would make a character be in smash bros.Snowmen are not anything special, what moves would he have.Snowballs, come on.And the reason most characters that should be in smash have swords is because those characters actually have history and are from amazing games.Felix(golden sun),Zael(The Last Story) Alucard(Castlevania) these characters deserve recognition.These characters just happen to be swordsman, not everyone is what you call a "samurai drone".
>>321212049
Frosty the snow man
>>321213136
I'm not autistic enough to play make believe. Sorry.
>>321213136
Also i can at least backup why these characters are so great.I dont just get some old character nobody knows and say he should be in smash bros.
>>321213303
You really are autistic."Play make believe" what did you not understand what i said.Of course these characters wont be in smash bros but you are doing the same thing.Why bother talking about your snowman if he wont be in smash bros.
>>321209767
This is what Shantae fags said when they saw the smash ballot opened
>>321213720
>quoting someone improperly
literally reddit
>>321213778
Shant games are shit and not nintendo
>>321214221
How did i quote it improperly?Seriously how?Also i have never been to reddit.
>>321214459
lurk more
>>321214650
Yeah, that explains how i improperly quoted someone.Could anyone else anwser my question or was this guy just being as an idiot.
>>321215141
no really, lurk more
>>321216058
Fine I'll do that.
