>>321128313
>You guys have literally NO reason not to play Witcher 1 now

1: it's a bad game
2: there doesn't need to be a 2

>>321128313
It's aged badly.

Really.

>shitty combat
There is your reason

>>321128313
Unpopular opinion: I found W1's combat to be the best out of all of them.

>>321132562

This.

>>321131574
it didnt age badly
it was bad when it came out

the Witcher 1 is good

>>321132562
>Unpopular opinion
>Unpopular
I think you mean "wrong."

>>321128313
Witcher 1 should honestly be remade for free because of how many sales they probably lost because of that trash. It might actually be profitable. Or at the very least remove a shit stain on their record.

>>321131574

Yes worse games get released by AAA game devs 7 years later compared to a then dev team paid in cheap turnip vodka and dreams and hopes of being a recognized company

>Price of individual products: 34.17
>Bundle cost: 34.39

Found my reason, OP. I'd get Witcher 1 and 2; and the third at a later date.

Witcher 1 is the best game of the trilogy.

>>321137129

So? I don't play those games either.

You pull out a pile of shit on a plate, tell me to eat it, I'm gonna tell you no. If you then whine that it could be diarrhea but instead it's far superior organic cornshit, doesn't change fucking anything. I'm not eating your shit, no matter how nice the silverware is, no matter who shat it out, it's still shit.