>has 2000 game hours
>*gives it a low score*
Why is this not a bannable offense? Why can't you just accept, that this is not how the world works?
Look up 7 days to die. Someone with nearly 5k hours gave it a thumbs down for good reason.
>>321115613
man i must be super fucked up because i have spicy shits all the time yet i still don't like them
i also don't like working either and i spend 5/7 days doing that
oh man and let's not forget all the colds i've had. why don't i enjoy a good cold now?
stupid frogposter
>>321115774
>eats sandwich
>sandwich tastes apparently like shit
>eats a second sandwich
>eats a third sandwich
>eats a fourth sandwich
>still eats it all whole
>gives it a bad review
Holy shit, you morons are literally everywhere. How fucking unreasonable do you have to be?
>less than 2000 hours played
>thinks he's given the game enough of a chance to give it a thumbs down
Why is this allowed?
>>321115613
Just because you play it a lot doesn't mean it's good.
I have over a year in Runescape. Not "oh I played that game for a year" no, I have one year actually spent ingame doing shit, a solid 8760+ hours (and that's without botting, that shit's for casuals).
I hate the game. It is a bad game. But it is very addicting.
>>321115613
>almost 3 thousand hours playtime
>thumbs up
>"It's pretty good"
>>321116010
It's not. There's no chemical reaction for such an addiction. You've made this up.
>>321115613
I'm more inclined to believe the man who played it for 2000 hours and in the end decided that he had made a horrible mistake.
>>321116147
>hover mouse over his profile pic
>"In Game: The game he gave a bad score"
>>321115984
>tries to make a sandwich analogy
>doesn't use the term "sandwich artist"
>>321115613
>>321115984
>this thread again
>>321115613
How come the green frog is always wrong and the red frog is always right?
>>321115774
>>321115983
>>321116005
>>321116010
Contrarian /v/ strikes again
>>321115774
>>321116005
>>321116407
hello reddit
>>321115983
you're an idiot or can't into analogy
no one is forcing these people to play these games for thousands of hours. They do it by choice, presumably because they are having fun with the game.
What OP is saying is, why would anyone invest thousands of hours into a game they overall didn't like?
>>321115613
>>has 2000 game hours
>>*gives it a low score*
They of all people should know what the game is like.
Or do you prefer someone with 1 hours played telling you about the game?
>knows the game better than you ever will
>WAH WHY CANT I BAN THIS PERSON FOR DISAGREEING WITH MY OPINION!
>>321116449
>>321116475
This is my first post in this thread and both of you are full of shit.
>>321115984
>shit and food in one analogy
everyone in this thread has been baited
>>321116475
hello kolbasa nigger
>>321116607
>>>/reddit/
>>321116729
You're the only one here with a fascination with reddit.
>>321116548
>trying to argue with shitposts
Nigga, don't even try.
>>321116527
Because NEETs are stupid. They invest hundreds of thousands of hours of their own life into being a failure, so why would you expect them to do anything differently when it comes to games?
>>321116527
Some games like Skyrim/Fallout open world games are heavily flawed but still great games to pass the time with/veg out while playing, so I'm guessing that's what's going on.
>>321116143
>>321116010
ehh well, perhaps the brain makes dopamine or some other chemical while playing it?
I have thousands of hours into runescape too and I can agree its a fucking stupid game, now.
Perhaps I wouldn't have said that while I was playing the game (though I could only do so by deluding myself) but looking back I can honestly say its a bad game.
Though, runescape stands out for numerous reasons. For one its an MMO with a decently large community. And its also go super high levels and shit perfect for completionists. I don't see how anyone can invest 1000+ hours on a singleplayer game unless its some shit like Pokemon or they are doing multiple play throughs.
>people with less than 10 hours played leave reviews
Shouldn't be allowed to post a review until you have played at least 10 hours. Only exception is if it's for some 90 minute walking simulator.
>>321116527
Could be the game is in early access and recent changes have fucked over the game or no progress has been done for a period of time. Think of Minecraft, it was loved on /v/ in the beta stages, the steady updates and surprise additions kept people happy, but then hunger was added and other negative changes along with long periods of nothing new started to drive people away. There are those who probably spent thousands of hpurs in the early beta that would not recommend people play the newest version for those reasons.
>>321115613
>play game for hours on end
>new update comes out and ruins the game
>give it a negative review
>have a thousand or two hours in a game
>don't want to stop playing because I have too much invested in it
>mostly play videogames for escapism more than anything, and it keeps me distracted enough I dont remember my shitty life when I play
>can genuinely find enjoyment in it, at least enough to play, but it took dozens of hours to get to the point where I did, and I know beginning the game fresh in its current state would be unfun as fuck
>keep playing because life is empty and dont want to have to think.
videogame
>>321116836
holy shit
>>>/reddit/
my man
>>321115984
>food analogy
WEW LAD
What if the game got a major update/overhaul that made it absolute shit?
>>321116890
>>321116983
Yeah, but that one anon's analogies don't hold water because no one is physically forcing these people into playing a game. Maybe if it was super expensive and they feel guilty for not getting the full experience but I don't thats the case for many. You don't just "catch" 1000 hour play times like you catch a cold.
>>321116998
This is also true. I've seen a lot of comments complaining about updates/bad ports. Most recent example for me is some free game called Robocraft. Apparently it had some update that ruined a lot of shit.
>Games can never change after they are released
Patched, updates and DLC can change a game and peoples opinions of it. Online games especially. An update can fuck up the game entirely (and games in the past have had this happen).
>>321117330
All the analogies in this thread have been terrible, it's simply a matter of self-hating NEETs doing things they hate because they like to punish themselves.
Good games aren't long ever.
There's a lot of games I've played a lot and I think they are complete dogshit, they are just addictive or have a few thing you like while you bear the rest, by your logic cigarretes are the best thing fucking ever.
>>321117287
That's often the case with mmo's that get bad reviews by people who have played them a lot. I think the subject of the previous thread that was this exact same topic a week or two ago was about a warframe review by someone with a ton of hours in it.
>>321116449
>>321116475
So which is it? Reddit or /v/?
>>321117087
holy shit
>>>/out/
my man
>>321116989
The brain releasing dopamine is the literal definition of you enjoying it
>>321117668
tumblr t b h f a m
>>321115984
>Read 1 Chapter of book in 5 minutes
>"Wow that was bad, let me stop"
vs
>"Read all the books in the 6 book series
>"Wow that was really bad, but I read all of it so I can give a really well formed opinion detailing its strengths and flaws."
You're right that no one is forcing them, but they do it to review for potential buyers.
You don't ask someone who doesn't like beer what kind of beer is good do you?
I'd rather trust a negative review with 5000 hours than a positive with 1 hour.
>>321117718
enjoying it doesn't mean its good
lots of people enjoy shitty stuff
>>321117881
When in steam I always check the negative reviews.
With negative reviews its easier to tell the people who genuinely didn't like the game from the people who are shitters.
>>321117881
>but they do it to review for potential buyers
These fuckers put 2000 hours into a bad game because they're retarded, not because they're doing us a favor.
>>321117330
Not recommended doesn't equal bad you autistic man.
You can play a game but realize it may have faults for others, or you can see it is heavily problematic but you still enjoy it even though you know many others won't. I thought this was painfully obvious, it simply means you wouldn't recommend someone should spend money on the game. You can like it, but others most likely won't.
This is what people don't seem to realize. Not recommended can mean a lot of things, doesn't always mean it's bad, you just need the context of the review which OP has failed to supply.
>>321118051
You what? For about 8 years now I've been trying to Finish Fallout 3 (got like 60 hours in or something), which is an absolute turd of a game and I can barely stomach it, just so I can shitpost about it on /v/ more efficiently.
>>321118051
Negative review doesn't necessarily mean "Wow this game was total dogshit and the world would be a better place if it didn't exist"
There are tons of reasons to leave a negative review for a game that can still be enjoyable
>>321118214
But steam specifically uses the term "negative" which means "less than good"
>>321118303
And that makes you dumb, m8.
>>321118331
Again, we need the context of the review.
>>321118051
No.
Curators or and people who just do reviews, literally do it for reviews.
Everyone else literally played 1999 hours and on the last hour they suddenly realize the game sucks, that's how most people get out of playing mmos, they realize it's either a waste of time or it legit sucksI used to love tf2 and l4d2 but suddenly I just didn't like it
>>321118303
autism levels have reached beyond maximum
can't contain any longer
>>321115984
>food analogy
>>321115613
>Game is literally perfect
>Love it
>An update hits that ruins everything good about it and ruins its charm and doesn't get fixed
>Give bad score
I see no problem here.
>>321115613
I dont understand what point you're trying to make. Why would this be a bannable offense? Someone with that many hours knows what they're talking about.
WHY they played that much is irrelevant.
>>321118359
So you're saying you should be able to tell if games are good or bad before you finish them then? And people who haven't finished a game are an accurate sourcfe of reviews? Tell me exactly how many hours you need to play.
>>321118331
And reviewers are given the option of recommend or not recommended.
If you don't recommend something, you don't recommend others to buy it, you still think it's good but you realize it's a bad game overall.
>>321115613
>game reviewer passionately cares about being as accurate as possible in his game review
>frog poster argues hes wrong when he hasnt even pirated the game at the very least to try it out
fuck off retard.
>don't play the game
>how can you say it's bad if you haven't even played it haha, it's not even out yet xD
>play the game for only an hour or so
>how can you say it's bad, you barely even played it haha, keep playing and you'll like it xD
>play the game for a couple of hours
>how can you say it's bad, you haven't even played enough of it haha, you're just not at the best part yet xD
>play the game for many hours
>how can you say it's bad, you've played it for so many hours haha, if you didn't like it you should have stopped xD
>>321118730
oh yeah well FUCK YOU :(
>>321115613
the chivalry ones are pretty justified desu
>>321115613
dumb frogposter
>>321119184
Good. I'm glad we've come to an agreement.
>>321115774
>buy onahole
>fuck it
>felt like fucking a blender
>continue to fuck it for 5000 hours
>give bad reveiw
?????
>>321115613
>Why can't you just accept, that this is not how the world works?
wait so you're telling me that i have to like something no matter what if i spent a certain amount of time with it?
>>321118928
The cutoff is 10-20 hours. Any less and you didn't give it a fair chance, any more and you have played too much of it to talk shit about it.
It would be great if you could filter reviews by playing time.
>Don't show reviews with under 3h playing time
for example
>>321115984
>food analogy
>>321115613
You know it's possibly to enjoy bad games right?
I'm not gonna give Tokyo Jungle anything higher then a 5 or 6, but I still pick it up time to time to unlock more costumes.
>>321119686
>you have played too much of it to talk shit about it.
literally not a thing
if you're subscribing to this being a thing you're literal cancer
>>321119309
I love these chen comics
>>321115613
Go fuck off and make a tired gamer thread retarded frogposter
>>321119309
You already paid for it, may as well use it.
>>321119309
>google onahole
>amazon link comes up
>I now have this permanently stamped on some amazon server somewhere
thanks
>>321119779
>>321118616
>>321117172
>>321116658
>samefaggot mad nobody agrees with him
>>321120131
>Didn't buy one
Faggot
>>321120251
>analogyfag mad no one thinks his analogy is clever
>>321120131Be sure to visit /ona/ on /jp/ if you want to know more. Enjoy.
>>321119686
Only that's different depending on the game you play.
An indie game might require 1-2 hours of playing it to properly judge it, a massive RPG that takes hours to finish might seem promising for the first 30 hours but begin getting repetitive/broken/uninteresting the closer you are to the end (or alternatively, it might require too much boring grinding to get to the good stuff; just because you played enough to get to the better part of the game doesn't make the rest of the experience you had less shitty).
A multiplayer game might be great during launch but become subjectively worse the more it's updated either because it took off to a different direction, the updates ruined the balance or the optimization went south. Just because you played hours before, doesn't mean it's still good and you should consider it as such.
>>321115613
i actually do the same, kkkkkkkkkkkk
>>321120131
Oh man, the amazon sales earlier in the year had some fucking whacky sex toys and other weird shit.
>>321115984
this
>>321116010
>8760
And here I felt ashamed because I spent 1000 hours playing this piece of shit game
Worst thread of the day, Jesus
>>321116994
yeah, I'd kill myself if I had to beat Gone Homo ten thousand times to get those ten hours in.
