Where should it take place?
>>321079052
Either Detroit, London, or San Francisco
>>321079052
The Deep South
>>321079357
>London
man get the fuck out of here with that non-America shit, it's not gonna happen, Dan Houser said it himself.
>>321079052
Tokyo, London, Vice City
London or Brazil, russia would be cool too
>>321079357
>Dangerous black gay
>Fancy gay
>Super gay
I'm sensing a theme here.
>>321079052
Not in San Andreas, vice city or liberty city, I hope they try new places
>>321079052
Somewhere not in the USA, it would be very interesting
>>321079052
Afghanistan or Angola
>>321079532
>I'm sensing a theme here.
being black?
>>321079357
>>321079380
>>321079479
>>321079520
>>321079523
>>321079532
>>321079668
>>321079673
It's gonna be Liberty City. I know it seems like we just left GTA IV but in 2018, when VI will probably be out or just around the corner, it'll be ten fucking years old. Miami's too similar to LA (so is San Francisco), Vegas isn't varied enough and anywhere else just isn't iconic in the way GTA needs it to be.
Sunny LA to cold NY is a pretty big distinction and I can see that being the rationale behind the decision, aside from the obvious (NY is iconic as fuck).
Also, think of the visuals. GTA V already looks great, even on last gen.
More evidence: http://www.ballerstatus.com/2014/04/03/grand-theft-auto-6-returning-liberty-city/
>Tokyo
>Brazil
>London
>Russia
Nice picks for some other dev wanting to make their own Sandbox.
Dan Houser declared that the GTA series grew to have the deepest geographical studies in gaming to adapt real locations into a video game, they will always be set in the United States for that fidelty to be maintained.
>>321080261
also someone screencap this post for use 3 years from now.
>>321079052
GTA6 is not gonna be vice city, rockstar already confirmed that
It's gonna be Las Vegas obviously
or maybe Dubai if not USA, but that would suck cause of shitskins
The next logical step would be Vice City I guess, but Vice City only worked so well due to the 80's aesthetic. Modern Miami doesn't seems anywhere near as cool.
I feel like a GTA in Chicago, Las Ventruras or San Fierro would be cool.
>>321080261
lol ebin memes
i sure as fuck hope we wont get another GTA4, GTA4 sucked, fuck new york it is gay as fuck
>>321080496
I wish they'd just bite the bullet and go 80s again, but they need that "epic" modern satire and the cellphone mechanic.
>>321080443
>It's gonna be Las Vegas obviously
Las Venturas and the real Las Vegas itself cannot be a whole game. Smaller than GTA3's own simple rendition of Liberty City.
>>321080496
>The next logical step would be Vice City I guess
>People keep saying this
just because the number 6 is VI in latin it doesnt mean it will be VIce city
fucking retards stop spamming this retarded shit
rockstar said they wont do 80's anymore and modern day vice city sucks ass
also vice city came before sa
>>321080570
The issue with Liberty City was that it wasn't a realistic depiction of New York. Everybody should've been wearing Tims, Roaches should've been as big as the cars, and subway should've been the only logical way to get around.
![maxresdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/WyAx1yS.jpg "maxresdefault[1].jpg")
>>321079052
I don't know or care, but I want a GTA set in 1970s Liberty City so it can be all French Connection style.
>>321080570
I can actually see this being the reaction in 3 years when I end up being right. /v/ will fucking despise R* for going back to Liberty City and I can't wait for the memesalthough personally I'm happy with it, I love NYC.
>>321080828
That's true, GTA IV didn't really capture the experience of trying to drive in New York City.
Then again, GTA V didn't really capture the Los Angeles traffic either, aside from occasionally when you'd switch between characters and they'd be "stuck in traffic."
>>321080828
boring gray city, yeah no
its definately gonna be a shiny city, where there is lots of luxery cars and shit
If in USA it will be Las Venturas (and maybe another city around)
If outside USA it will be Dubai
80's vice city or modern day vice city is out of the picture
new york seems even more logical cause it attracts more to their target audience
nobody but 25+ year olds on /v/ would care for another vice city
>>321080980
i hope they make it more interesting and less boring and gray then, also needs outside areas. Just a city alone gets old really fast.
Not Vice City itself, but the surrounding areas too, and an expy of Cuba, featuring human trafficking missions a la Trevor with multiple "recipients"of your potential cargo.
>>321079052
Why is everyone ignoring Hawaii? It has
>a varied landscape
>many islands
>rich people
>race conflicts
Saudi Arabia so we can have Saudi Drift competitions.
Anyone before you reply: think of this
They are gonna do whatever gets them to sell most shark cards
80's vice city is something they pulled off but cant pull off a second time
its gonna be modern day, 100% sure. Even future is higher chance than past. But it will be modern day, it will have the bugatti veyron, etc.
You need shit to spend shark cards on, dont forget
>>321081382
Would be just crazy enough to work, but R* would probably never touch it.
>>321081092
NY state is varied as fuck and I can't imagine they'll avoid countryside again, pretty sure they didn't include it at the time because of tech limitations.
There's tons of opportunity. I want a city as big as GTA V's entire map with countryside on top of it and it's totally possible given the hardware.
Not Vice City itself, but the surrounding areas too, and an expy of Cuba, featuring human trafficking missions a la Trevor with multiple "recipients"of your potential cargo.
Also, club scene that would eclipse the one from TBoGT, lots of corporate greed on top of social upheaval, gators and pythons to hunt and be hunted by, literally metric AND imperial fucktons of pop culture to pull from with just Disney and News of the Weird to reference.
Florida is some crazy shit. Makes for good gaming and parody.
>>321081638
>backwoods drug running in the Hudson Valley
sign me the hell up
Detroit2089 CE
>>321081638
>>321081697
Its gonna be Las Venturas or Dubai.
They are all about luxery life
luxery life = shark card sells
they dont give a fuck about you 25 year and older guys with nostalgia goggles, Muh "VIce city"
allt hey want is 12 year olds to spend mommy and daddy creditcardmoney on shark cards, and the only thing interesting enough for 12 year olds to buy with shark cards is expensive, modern, luxery cars and tactical nightvision shit.
>>321079052
New Orleans
btw did it cross anyones mind that they might expand from gta5? that gta6 will infact be adding las venturas or san fierro to the map so we get a new gta afterall?
Probably not the States, since Los Angeles and New York are the only two places anyone cares about in that awful country.
Perhaps Canada?
>>321081638
Also, seasons. Liberty City is objectively the best location.
>>321081894
I wouldn't mind Vegas but it's a pretty boring landscape. Casino heists would be cool though.
I don't think the Houser brothers care as much about the children as you think. Obviously Take Two is in charge but the single player will likely never take a dive because of online, I just can't see it happening with R*.
>>321081894
They could do plenty of upscale luxury shit in Liberty City, dude. Have you seen the property values in Manhattan? NYC is increasingly becoming the playground of the super rich. Brooklyn is feeling the gentrification squeeze, and it's now just full of trust-fund hipsters. Soon, no one will be able to afford it, except maybe way out in Queens or up in the Bronx, or maybe like Chinatown.
Plus they could do plenty more with the whole BAWSAQ stuff in Liberty City, since Wall Street is actually in NYC.
In the garbage bin.
After V, and where they took it with GTAO, I have zero faith in Rockstar anymore.
>make GTAV
>add 3 whole protagonists
>have the opportunity to have a massive game that fleshes these 3 characters out with their own storylines, occasionally intertwining
>merge them all together the entire game and barely flesh any of them out
>game relatively short
>ends up all the money, time, and effort went into a barely-functioning Online aspect of the game
>plays like shit because what do you expect from the people who play GTA games
>only ever support the MP with updates
>SP left to rot
Fuck em and fuck GTA.
>>321079052
def vice city, but they can make it even bigger and include areas around it
>everglades type swamp area
>disney
>small islands off of coast maybe include key west and cuba
>coastal city has huge club scene
>gta that has huge emphasis on water vehicles and possibly underwater sections
After seeing what they've been doing with GTAO and how it's been handled, I really don't want another GTA game.
Online is not fun and you can't afford to do fucking anything.
Post Manhunt Carcer City mite b kool. There could still be some snuff gangs or corrupt Law Enforcement element. Or just another Manhunt game would be tits, or Bully 2. Red Dead Resolution would be the best. I really hope they do another one of those before GTA VI.
If outside the USA its gonna be Dubai and you get to own tigers
if inside USA its gonna be Las Venturas with casino and hotel heists
>>321082613
Do you have any idea how much time/effort goes into making a single player campaign on the level of GTA V? The quantity might be a little less but the quality is just ridiculous. No game comes close in terms of gameplay fluidity, physics, even writing. It feels like you're playing a movie.
Plus, I barely touch Online and I still have hundreds of hours played. WAY more shit to do than GTA IV.
>>321079052
What would the story be like and who would be the protag?
Isnt most gta's a rags to riches story?
And what the fuck are shark cards? I havent played v
>>321083014
Doesn't stop their post from being right.
Las Venturas would be awesome to return to, maybe add some paranormal side missions where you go into an Indian Reservation where all kinds of spooky shit happens.
>>321079052
I wish it was something interesting like England or Asia or Mexico.But it will probably be vice city again. And I doubt it will be anything other than present-day.
>yfw they make a Vice CityExpansion for GTAOwith no singleplayer content.
>>321085074
>>321085074
>GTA V having DLC other than weapons and vehicles
That's funny!
>>321085301
They specifically stated they would like to add new land content to GTAO down the line.
>>321085074
>>321080570
4 was great, and has more city roads than 5, and the multiplayer free roam was better.
Seriously "GTA 4 sucked" is like the ultimate warning sign of underagedb&. The graphics jump from 4 to 5 was great but there was hardly anything else improved and they removed crouching. I still fucking hate that.
Prohibition-era Chicago.
>>321085397
>Believing Jew*
>>321085397
Oh really? I guess they got enough complaints when they released it and said they wouldn't be doing any large scale DLC.
>>321079052
Make it span across 3 city/states. I was hyped in SA when we got to briefly re-visit liberty city.
Bring back that airport from Vice City and let us choose to take a quick travel flight or even fly our private jets ourselves. for years i wished they'd just bring all states together. we have the technology to merge old LC, VC and SA
>>321086719
>I'd rather have three half-assed cities than one lovingly detailed one
eh, to each his own i guess
>>321079052
the stone age
>>321087027
why not three lovingly detailed cities? this is R* we're talking about, not bethesda
Moscow
But it's American game so Detroit
>>321079052
At Poland
>>321087039
>Far Cry 5 does good
>every other AAA Publisher starts laying down plans for stone age games
>becomes the new open world
Watch.
>>321079052
70's or 80's, I'm fucking sick of the modern setting of the last games.
A proper Vice City in the 80's again would be the tits.
San Francisco in the 60's or 70's would be pretty neat too.
>>321087039
>GTA: Bedrock
>stealing dinosaurs
>meeting celebrities like Cary Granite and Stony Curtis
>dedicated "yabba dabba doo" button
I'd play the shit out of that
>>321087278
70s LC would be incredible. Taxi Driver vibes and shit. But yeah, they're gonna stick with modern
>>321079052
In ur mum's vagoo, oh wait, that map would be too big.
>>321088121
fucking destroyed
>>321087027
that's not what i was implying at all. don't a fucking moron. why would they suddenly drop the ball on this one? they've gotten better and better over the years with each incantation of the game. don't see why they couldn't make the 3 cities as polished.
>>321087278
>70s
That would be great, especially in San Fierro. Lots of movies to get inspiration from too.
>>321087454
We got that for the most part in IV. LC looks appropriately ancient
>>321088409
not him but personally, I want one city as big as the GTA V map rather than three LS-sized cities
Los Santos feels big but I want more 2bh
>>321088409
because it would take them forever? it was like 5 years between IV and V, don't forget
>>321087370
The more I think about it, the more I want it.
I hope they do futuristic. I dont care what city as long as it's done well and has a lot more interiors
http://gamerant.com/futuristic-grand-theft-auto/
>>321088651
I feel like GTA would never go futuristic, since part of its MO is social commentary, and while sci-fi can do veiled social commentary, the GTA games are usually a little more on-the-nose about it
>>321088651
future GTA isn't gonna happen
as for interiors I think the generational leap will really center around that, I think GTA VI will have all interiors open. sounds near-impossible but with procedural generation and current-gen hardware I think they can do it. it'd be such a vast improvement
I hope they bring back progression, having the entire map unlocked from the start made it boring.
The new areas felt special when you needed to unlock them, that way you could have specific cars, or stuff like an airport be more of a reward like in the old games.
That one autist mudslide that keeps saying it will be in Dubai every thread
>>321088880
I agree. money needs to feel more valuable as well, I barely buy anything in GTA V
I hope they place it somewhere no one is really thinking off. Screw any of the main 3, shit's old by now. Atlanta, Seattle, D.C, just something fucking new
>>321088826
>Social Commentary
Oh yeah because V was chock full of great social commentary.
>hurhur we're all stupid cause we live in LA so funnah
Also why couldn't they make a futuristic game with social commentary? I mean I don't think they WILL do it, but there's plenty to work with if you are showing what the world will be like in 50 years or whatever.
>>321089307
Hey I never said it was necessarily good or insightful social commentary, just that that's part of it
(and GTA IV at least tried a little with the whole immigrant story and stuff about the American dream)
>>321079520
Tokyo would be cool, I haven't seen a game set in modern tokyo, I've always wondered why
You'll be able to travel between Los Santos, Liberty City, and Vice City. Loading screens involved? Probably, this is current gen hardware we're talking about. Have you seen the drops the PS4 gets on GTA V? Pathetic.
>>321089462
Up until 5 there was the occasional smart joke. 5 has the fucking worst writing when it comes to trying to say anything insightful. It's almost a parody of itself.
>>321089843
But it's still good as a game right? I haven't bought it yet and got idle hands these holidays.
>>321079052
>gta VI
>VIce city
It's the nly possible option
>>321081638
>I want a city as big as GTA V's entire map
That would be awful
>>321090252
It's the best game of the series beyond any doubt.
This is coming from someone who has played the series since it first debuted back in the 90s.
>>321079479
london was in there before, also rockstar is a british developer so...
>>321090743
Why?
>>321082243
>nobody cares about any US city other than NYC and La
>let's do Toronto or Quebec instead
Yeah, sure.
>>321089307
>Oh yeah because V was chock full of great social commentary.
it was? if you can't see it that's because you're too young to understand the jokes.
A complete change of scenery would be nice.
A big Asian city with cartels and shit. Hong Kong or something.
>>321090856
get fucked
http://metro.co.uk/2013/09/20/rockstar-rules-out-gta-london-gta-is-america-4060440/
>>321080941
I would really like a 1970s GTA, but I can't see it happening.
>>321090743
but the city in v is so fucking small
Fuck modern era, make a GTA set in the 20s.
Do you really want another GTA after 5? It's one of the weakest of the 3D series. The map is forgettable, the locations are bland, there's no landmarks, the characters are unlikable and they try to rectify this by making other characters even worse, and the story isn't all that interesting either.
India or Iran or Pakistan
Fucking sick of Europe and Muricunt in video games, there are other continents you fucking development dipshits
Texas Miami Even thought I would love a gta in Mexico but that's unlikely.
>>321091378
>the characters are unlikable and they try to rectify this by making other characters even worse
Wow, I could never quite put my finger on it but you just explained what's wrong with GTA V's storymode in one sentence.
GTA can die forever as far as I'm concerned. Give me Bully 2 and another Red Dead.
>>321091415
There aren't any other good ones though lol
>>321079052
maybe Carcer City, most likely Vice City, hopefully NOT Liberty City.
Why do people want a rehashed location? I want a new place no video game has ever done before.
Shit, make up a city if you have to.
>>321091415
GTA Balochistan
Yes sounds like an excellent idea
>>321080275
>Brazil
I would love if some developer did to Rio or Salvador what they did to Hong Kong in Sleeping Dogs. Too bad it won't from a national developer, since our gaming industry is pretty much non-existant.
chicago or boston
>>321079052
Carcer City
>>321079520
>>321080275
>>321090976
its already been done kids
Bullworth
>>321091952
and it was fucking insanely good, so i have no problem with another gta in hong kong
>playing GTA V PC on ultra 1080p 60fps
>installing new, real life cars with flawless 3D models ripped from Forza and Assetto Corsa
>modding all cars to reach real life top speeds and allowing actual drifting/realistic physics
>modding police behavior with crime and punishment overhauls
>driving gorgeous Ferraris and Bugattis cars in a beautiful setting with challenging physics and NPCs
GTA V PC GOTY.
>>321090319
I hope they cal it something stupid like GTA: VIce City
>>321091378
GTA V is the best of the GTA series and one of the best games of all time. It's definitely the biggest technical achievement in gaming.
While Vice City was a cute rendition of Miami and San Andreas had cute renditions of LA/LV/SF, GTA V practically IS Los Angeles. Obviously the size isn't even close but the overall feel is totally fucking there. It's uncanny.
The fluidity in gameplay, physics, character control, etc. is incredibly realistic and hasn't been matched by any other game. It isn't even close. That's without even mentioning the movie-level story execution. I've said this before but GTA V actually feels like you're playing a movie, it's insane and completely worth the hype (as well as the billions of dollars). GTA IV have slightly better writing but that doesn't matter when this is the execution: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bi6e1rRGgo&feature=youtu.be&t=92
The argument used to be (with GTA IV) "San Andreas has more to do" but even that doesn't hold any weight at this point. GTA V has fuckloads of high-quality content that far surpasses 99% of the competition. You might not be able to use dildos as weapons but there's Saints Row for that "EPIIIIIC SUPERHERO XDDD" garbage.
Really though, I'm tired of this "GTA V is bad" meme. Nothing has come close since its release two years ago.
>>321091692
They'd never make one up because they "pride" themselves on recreating real life locations but I agree completely that this shit needs to be in a different place.
It doesn't have to be somewhere iconic like NYC and LA. There are interesting cities in just about every state, besides the midwest squares. Doesn't even have to be a huge city, just an interesting location.
>>321092338
First thing I'm going to do when I get a new PC andpirateGTA V is add a bunch of modded planes
Why fly something that looks like a shitty F-18+F-16 hybrid when I can fly an actual F-18 modelyes I know pic related is an F-14
>>321079052
El Paso
>>321092791
And yet I have more fun fucking around in IV than I do in V
For a game that was supposed to be a "serious" GTA, the driving physics, the explosions and the ragdolls make it retardedly fun
>>321092842
yeah the modded planes are mental.
Also, a guy just released a mod which gives you access to the new super yachts in single player mode, instead of only being available in online mode.
Car handling mods are a must, or if you really like to tinker you can get a tool that alllows you to customize all car handling easily and quickly.
Some german dude made it, so you know it's good.
>>321079052
Either Chicago or Houston
>>321093040
I prefer V's driving but the GTA IV ragdolls are far superior, I agree. Still have more fun with V though, GTA IV is barren as fuck in terms of actual content.
>>321093040
>having more fun
this is subjective anon. someone can just as easily, and just as truthfully, say they have more fun in gta V than IV.
>>321092842
>devs go out of their way to design a ton of fictional vehicles
>first thing people do is replace them with real life vehicles
>>321093381
I honestly don't like mods generally. They always take away from the original vision and almost never feel "professional".
>>321093381
Makes it more immersive imo.
Plus real life cars look better than the mixture of cars the gta devs like to do.
They put real life music in the game from real life artists, i might as well have some real life cars and planes to go along with it.
What if Anywhere City became Anywhere State, then kept the future aspect so more things are possible? Various parts of the state can be used to represent the many time periods that fans have come to enjoy - and then something new.
>Bottom half of the map is heat street; 70s - 80s references galore; everyone is fighting for this chunk of the state; police are less common here. Vintage guns and cheap cars
>Middle half of the map is the "contemporary" area; not a lot goes on here; there are suburbs and a bit of forest to explore, but this place mostly represents the new millenium. The same groups fight over this city to a lesser degree; a lot of the fights here are started by the police. Military-grade weapons and moderate cars.
>Sitting between 2/3 of the map and the other 1/3 is a large desert; small patches of civilization resembling Middle-Eastern kibbutzim can be found here. Secret super-weapon, cheap cars.
>Truly representing Anywhere State is Anywhere City, its capital. Here, the protagonist(s) is reminded of their time. Gangs are virtually non-existent. Instead, there are simply two factions: the criminals, which are made up of all earlier gangs, and the police, which is essentially just its own gang. Energy weapons, hover cars.
>Miscellaneous gated communities in between represent quieter times, like the 20s - 50s; shit's pretty posh here, with the exception of the mobsters controlling it. Classic weapons, expensive (but slow) cars.
>Four playable characters, all with intertwined stories, and from different parts of the map, but only three are available throughout the main campaign. The fourth character actually works as the explanation for many of miscellaneous factors influencing the events of the main campaign.
>Each character has a unique skill/weapon set (i.e. using rifles for drive-by, running twice as fast, taking twice as much damage, etc.); different weapons may be used, but the characters are best with the ones they originally own.
>>321093319
>this is subjective anon
Never claimed otherwise
V is a superior game in basically everything, incluiding a far bigger and prettier map which I love because I love just driving or flying around
Just saying that when I feel like blowing shit up and running over dozens of peds, I prefer IV
>>321093627
Red Dead has the best ragdoll physics actually. I know they're exaggerated for the western theme but they really made you feel powerful.
>>321090252
I mean, it's still the new GTA which is always going to be better than the last one at least in some measure. I have a lot of gripes with it but if your PC can run it it's worth the buy.
>>321093381
the military aircraft in gtav were ridiculously stupid. they just frankensteined two craft together to create the ugliest shit. it was embarrassing to fly but they forced you to.
Liberty City and Los Santos have been done twice, and Vice City doesn't work if it's not set in the 80s. And I doubt they'd bring back Fierro and Venturas
They need a new city
>>321093553
Many many gta V addon cars have 3D models ripped from forza and other games. Most of them have full interiors of their own and a lot of them even have specific mods (hoods/side skirts, spoilers etc.) that you can install in game.
I've installed probably 50 new cars on GTA i've only uninstalled 2 or 3 for being below quality.
Breakable glass, full damage, modding, etc. is essentially the standard for non-beta releases. Check em out sometime family, you might be surprised.
>>321090945
The really funny jokes like
>haha meth heads do meth
>haha LA people do yoga
>haha LA people smoke weed
>haha niggers
Yeah ok, bud
>>321093915
see
>>321080261
The generational leap in visuals/map size/interior quantity will make it worth it
>>321093889
I'm glad they didn't make anything resembling an F-22 or 35 though, that would be boring as fuck
I'd rather have something more rural-based than something set in a huge city
Does anything interesting (in the GTA sense) happen in rural US?
>>321094467
Fuck yes. Try rural Alabama. They could make that shit nuts but fun as hell.
>>321094467
lets go steal some tractors and tip some cows yeehaw! aw shit, I just got lynched.
>>321087370
>dedicated yabba dabba doo button
my sides
>>321091952
That's hong kong m8
>>321094467
>GTA VI: Greenwich, CT
>Drive around in nice cars and send your kids to private schools
>Drink craft beer alone in your study
>Drive to Hartford and get stabbed by a black crackhead
>Eat a lobster roll in the car on the way back to your McMansion
Damn, that's gangster.
>>321092791
GTA 4's physics where way better than 5's.
Driving a car in 4 is fucking great, you really feel the weight of the car, it was also a bit harder, but had a higher skill ceiling, if you played a lot you eventually got really good at the driving, at least I did.
5's driving is a step back if you ask me, it's way more arcadey, the cars just seem glued on the road.
I would personally want the art style of GTA II in 3D.
It could be a fresh dose of something more wacky than the monotone realism, but sadly it will never happen because normies wouldn't buy it.
open world game with a 1:1 map of the entire US when
>>321096204
Wasn't there a racing game that did this recently? Or was I dreaming
>>321096204
>wanting a 1.2 TB game
>>321096327
The Crew, but it's not 1:1, not even close
but guysSeattle
>>321096204
As cool as it would be to have such a huge map for comfy and exploration purposes, you can't make an actual game set in an area that huge
>mission objective is in another state 4500 km away
Yeah na
>>321096952
how about
>several characters
>each character based in one city/state
>each character has their own storyline
>you can only play one character at once, no switching btw multiple playable characters in the middle of the game or anything
>entire map is open for free roaming but each game/story only takes place in one area, not the whole map
>People legit think that any new GTA will be set in a non-American city
It would never work because Americans wouldn't 'get' it.
>>321097169
I feel like 3 individual stories would be kinda lame if they never interconnected. Playing characters with different motives/alliances however could be cool as shit. Like, you play as one guy and steal some shit from a biker gang, but the other character has friends that need whatever the biker gang was delivering and yadda yadda yadda.
I just want a new bully game
>>321092791
>While Vice City was a cute rendition of Miami and San Andreas had cute renditions of LA/LV/SF, GTA V practically IS Los Angeles. Obviously the size isn't even close but the overall feel is totally fucking there. It's uncanny.
>The fluidity in gameplay, physics, character control, etc. is incredibly realistic and hasn't been matched by any other game. It isn't even close. That's without even mentioning the movie-level story execution. I've said this before but GTA V actually feels like you're playing a movie, it's insane and completely worth the hype (as well as the billions of dollars). GTA IV have slightly bette
If you mean '10 hours of non-stop swearing' when you say 'movie level story execution' you're right.
the swearing gets old man so much filler
>>321090856
Fucking idiot
>>321080496
Maybe they aught to bring back the character switch but limit it to two character in different timelines. that would be fucking cool
>>321079052
Carcer when?
>>321098025
This
>>321079052
Fuck gta
Most of their playerbase wants a gta V expansion or a bully sequel, not gta: insert the same 3 citys
You retards are forgetting that no matter the hardware, it still takes time to create content. If you want a world 5 times bigger than V it's going to be literally 10 years if you want the same level of detail, which will be pretty bad by then.
>>321093381
>go out of their way to design a ton of fictional vehicles
No they don't all the cars are shameless copies of real cars and they're not even good models, the proportions are usually pretty off and they've got stupid shit like laser straight b pillars which is not only lazy modeling, it would make it impossible to roll down the window
http://gta.wikia.com/wiki/Vehicles_in_GTA_V
Carcer City
>>321082960
pretty sure a third red dead game is confirmed to be in the works
>>321079052
They need to just do one in Chicago and make the story about gang wars. We've had too many games in NYC and LA by now.
I'd like them to go back to Liberty City, keep it the same but add Upstate Liberty and maybe another borough. It's unlikely though so I'll say Las Venturas. Didn't like Vice City and San Fierro was a bit bland.
>>321090252
There's no doubt you'll have a great time with it, just don't expect the 10/10 everyone gave it
>>321079052
I don't really mind when they set it, but I definitely want another 'historical' GTA. 70s or 80s, I don't mind which, but not another midern day one.
>>321079052
Vegas
Anywhere but Vice Shitty.
>>321080691
There is a lot more to Vegas than just the strip. Sadly the strip is the only interesting part.
Vegas + San Francisco would be ideal but I don't think they want to do more than a single city.
just use themes from vegas and the first VC and expand on them
>>321079052
In your ass.
>>321103181
*tips fedora*
Carcer City god dammit.
>>321091952
It's a shame it's getting some kind of f2p pseudo-mmo sequel instead of something good
>>321094694
I've tipped a cow before, it's harder than it sounds.
>>321108317
You're a monster.
>>321079357
>London
LOL
why don't they just make the whole damn country?
>>321109807
MDMA makes you do stupid shit.
>every where do you want the next gta in thread
>suggestions like london/tokyo/anywhere that isn't the states
>people not getting this series to begin with
<3 this meme
>>321079052
Vice City, because I'm an unoriginal fuckstain with terrible ideas.
We need 60's but now Darker 60's
Some Kung Fury style or something
>>321110750
>60's
>kung fury
>>321110750
end ur life stupid.
V I C E C I T Y
I
C
E
C
I
T
Y
I want Red Dead 3 or Bully 2
just make the whole world tbqh familia
>>321110997
I said Style
>>321109807
It's a common misconception that it kills them, it just freaks them the fuck out.
>>321111446
You don't get it. You're retarded.
>>321110750
American education everyone.
>>321111512
I get it. I'm retarded
>>321111498
And causes potential life-threatening injuries to them. No biggie.
>>321110750
1910=music started
>everyone still talking about the next GTA
>implying RDR2 isin't comming out next.
Boy they better not fuck this one up because everyone is pretty much expecting them to outdo themselves.
>Continue living as Jack Marston.
>Get to see america during WW1
>Possibility of Jack marston living two lives, Lots of moral decisions are given to the player through out the game that could determine a couple of really interesting endings.
Fuck i want this more than any other GTA setting.
All though the need to find another voice actor for that character because it was weird listening to a modern teenager trying to sound like a rough cowboy, Did a great job as Young Jack though.
London is THE perfect setting for the GTA.
If it's a new gta, it's definately going to be modern day vice city
Knowing rockstar, they would have a field day making fun of wynwood, britto art and ultratoo bad rockstar is pretty shit now but I'd still buy it just because I live here
>>321091952
Amazing game, But the driving is fucking TERRIBLE.TERRIBLE
>>321080261
thinking about that possibility, of rockstar alternating between los santos and liberty city (which, to me, doesn't sound bad at all) honestly just gets me hyped thinking about the insane 2020 los santos they can make.
Vice City, but also a lot of wilderness and swamplands and an area of Cuba.
>>321112891
>and an area of Cuba.
vice city already did this
>>321079357
San Francisco sounds good, it feels like a city stuck in the 80"s with a lot drugs gangs and homelessness. Perfect gta
>>321079357
They won't do it in London BECAUSE they're British. It's more fun and more posh to make fun of Americans, while "living" in the word of Hollywood America. If they actually did a game in the UK, they'd do their stereotypes and everyone would ignore it because they have a complex and a stiff upper lip.
>>321080443
Dubai
>this retarded
>>321090986
Can I call this retarded?
>London 1969 was a mistake
>>321112039
2bh I can't see any purpose for RD3. Redemption was pretty much perfect in terms of mechanics/features/even visuals. A sequel would only end in disappointment.
Rockstar should stick purely to GTA, that way we can get sequels every 3 years rather than 5 or 6.
>>321112816
Personally I'd prefer a cycle of Liberty City/Vice City. Los Santos is cool but Vice City would be so fucking pretty
>>321113826
Good point, I'd rather have a good solid ending to game rather than milking that shit.
>>321114045
Thats Australia.
>>321085397
Like what they said for single player DLC....
>>321114301
kek I think you're right. I just downloaded the best looking "Miami" picture on google.
>>321087108
Shut your mouth chicken nugget.
>>321079052
>Everyone wants something based on an existing city
>Again
I'd like to see them do something completely original.
>>321114426
Yeah they named a suburb on the gold coast miami because it looks exactly the same.
>Vegas in 60s or 70s or 80s.
>Work for casinos/mob bosses.
>Fight off gangs/other groups.
>Reason for corrupt police.
>Vegas, Lake Mead, Goodsprings, Mt. >Charleston.
>Desert/mountains.
10/10 Game.
>>321114045
I think it's about time we got a LONDON GTA.
I'm sure everyone is at some point getting tired of the whole LA/NY shit. All though Rockstar pretty much makes the best satirical/parody content, And LA/NY are full of shit to make fun of.
Especially Jimmy.
They should make a singleplayer DLC where it's all about Michael kicking out Jimmy and you get to live out his stupid,spoiled crazy life.
>>321114732
most "completely original" ideas would just be off-brand versions of cities we've already had.
Chicago or Boston = Liberty City. Honolulu or San Francisco = LS and maybe Vice City. There's two real possibilities, hot/sunny and cold/dark, and I can't see R* straying away from LC, LS or Miami. Even Miami seems off the table at this point.
>>321113826
>Rockstar should stick purely to GTA
Only after they fucking make bully 2
>>321079052
India. You start out as a guy who picks up after people pooping on the streets and end up as the top dog in the curry industry.
1970s London/Glasgow/Manchester/Belfast, or a combination thereof.
Surely I can't be the only person who wants this.
I just want a San Andreas remake 2bh. The map was pretty much perfect.
>>321115438
>Grand Theft Loo: Designated
>>321115424
like I said for Red Dead, Bully doesn't really need a sequel. It's probably my favorite R* game and it was great for its time but next-gen visuals + higher levels of detail will ruin the humor, artstyle and overall vision. For a while I thought an SJW-focused Bully game would be neat but really, GTA covers all those satirical grounds already.
Everything good about Bully would be ruined by modern techniques and graphical standards. 10 years ago was the perfect time for it to release, I just can't see a sequel happening anymore
Red Dead is gonna happen whether I want it or not though
>>321115715
>The map was pretty much perfect.
There was a whole lot of emptiness and I always felt like they focused most of their efforts into making Los Santos great and then half-assed the other three cities.
>>321112559
Are you talking about GTA IV? Because you sure the fuck aren't talking about SD
>>321115438
> making your own curry recipes and run formidable business
> other large name curry competitor starts to get jealous and starts to sabotage your business by bombing some restaurants, killing your workers, making your restaurants his by way of force
> You have to shut your competitor down while maintaining your business
I would play the fuck out of this
>>321115871
What does better graphics have to do with humor or anything? Bully looked way better than any GTA on PS2 and still had loads of charm, personality and its own vibe. As long as they don't try to make something too realistic or serious and keep a similar art style it will be fine.
If anything I think the problem is that a game like Bully wouldn't be the same if you play it as a 25 year old guy instead of as a teenager
>>321115878
There wasn't much in San Fierro but Las Venturas with the casinos, desert with area 69, countryside, all made the game feel big. Having one city in the corner of the map definitely doesn't work. V felt dead as there was never any reason to leave Los Santos.
>>321116638
Bully with modern visuals would have to be 'realistic' (at least in the GTA-vein) otherwise there'd be a jarring disconnect
Bully's gameplay/humor is more on-par with the 3D era GTAs, and clearly that shit went out the window with the Rage engine
>>321115000
But I dont need a "Sucking dick for hamburgers and vidya" simulator when I do it IRL.
1970s Liberty City with a funk station, disco station, arena rock station, and a hard rock station.
You can pretty much play your own gritty Martin Scorsese game.
>>321117802
They won't do this because they're afraid of babbies not liking anything pre-modern era
>>321081382
Plus that 'isolated island(s) with no continental landmass in sight' shit is already done for them.
>>321093586
Maybe re-tune some of the finer details but the idea of having different parts of the map acting like their own city is an amazing idea
>>321079052
>Liking plebian franchises
Haven't you learned from the last two, idiots?
>>321118063
It's a real shame, because the 70s are the only decade they really have to cover. They've done the 60s, 80s, 90s, 00s, and 10s. A 1970s GTA game is long overdue.
>>321118915
They haven't done a period piece in 11 years man. Really sucks. Modern settings just don't have an interesting 'vibe' to me.
Funnily enough, GTA IV is actually much more atmospheric now that we're so far removed from 2008. Actually feels like a time capsule in a way.
>>321119348
>Modern settings just don't have an interesting 'vibe' to me.
Probably because you can go outside and experience it firsthand. You can't experience the 80s or the 70s firsthand right now, so they're more interesting time periods.
Deep south, small counties with more attention put into them, every building is enterable. Dense forrests with many hidden areas, pot farms, moonshine huts, meth labs etc.
Maybe two characters instead of three, one is a redneck, the other a police officer.
Maybe a suprise cameo with trevor.
>>321089478
GTA focuses on crime obviously and there isn't much big crime in any of Japan's major cities. Though I do second Tokyo. Seeing a city full of lights and shit would be really cool in GTA
also qt asian girls
