I wish more games had anatomically correct monsters/animals/mutants.
Just look at this shit for example. Overall, BB has some of the nicest monster designs I've ever seen, humans that have transformed into uncanny abominations. Yet every time you look at their crotch, it's blank as if it was shaved off. It annoys me to no end.
Wouldn't monsters be more disturbing (in a positive way) if they weren't castrated for the sake of R ratings? I don't mean erect, dripping dicks shoved in your face, but at least it should be there if you look.
Give me some games with anatomically correct enemies, /v/. I'm sure they exist.
murrica just can't handle it
look for japanese games as always they're the answer
>>320859062
Want to see another medium that does this same shit? Fantasy art. Look at any mainstream shit like MTG card art or whatever, where a lot of the subjects are naked monsters/ goblins/ horrors/ whatever. Not a single dong. As a fantasy artist myself, this sort of bothers me, so I put dongs where appropriate. It just seems so fake to remove the penis of a creature because penises scare Americans or something.
>>320859062
Manhunt ?
Dantes Inferno had jiggle physics on satans giant dong
>>320860050
>>320859851
these
but muh murican children who need to be circumcised and cant get sex education before they are "mature" enough
>Witcher 3 didn't even show/model Geralt's junk
>they literally don't exist even though its implied
>>320860050
Just make "penis" a 10 black mana drop card.
80% chance to make opponent forfeit if facing red and blue deck.
>>320860050
Give a link to your art man, I want to see someone drawing fantasy creatures right. It's great that people like you exist
>>320859062
>Yet every time you look at their crotch, it's blank as if it was shaved off. It annoys me to no end.
Post-transformation outfits are a lot worse. Just look at Vicar Amelia.
>>320861470
I have better shit, but this is actually the only thing I have that does indeed show a dong (it's subtle):
>>320859062
I'm sure there's Skyrim mods for what you are looking for OP I mean you aren't very subtle
>>320861470
This one too, though it's not done.
>>320861691
This is like if Edmund Mcmillen drew porn
I think it's most insulting, when the creature is clearly a mammal of some kind, if it's reptilian it at least has an excuse.
>>320859062
>i need more dongs
>>320861691
>>320861794
See, video games need more of this. It's not dicks for the sake of sexuality, but at least it makes monsters more believable.
>>320859062
OP is this a subtle way of saying you like monster dicks?
>>320859062
I always think of Dante's Inferno and Lucifer's swinging horse cock. Honestly, there was some fucked up shit in that game, but very few complaints about the nudity. I bet if it was released tomorrow people would bat a few eyes, but the reception to it would be overall the same; a mild warning about some of the imagery.
It's more about sexuality that makes people uncomfortable in America... Not nudity. If you put tits or a cock on some hideous monster, probably not too many people will care. But if I-No's tits are everywhere and she talks about is fucking and climaxing nonstop people start bitching and moaning.
>>320861794
>>320861794
There has to be an actual point to it though, if you are going to have it that pronounced in the image. Like are you going for something themed like Giger, where there is a sexual overtone? Or is there a story reason for having dongs so prominently displayed? 'Realism' is kind of a moot point here. Art is a reflection of the artist, and if your reasoning isn't convincing poeple will suspect you simply just like dongs.
>>320859062
>this thread
>>320859851
Bloodborne is japanese though, and it's the game with the most wasted potential when it comes to accurately portraying a transformed human anatomy-wise
>>320862502
Are you retarded? He explained why in his very first post.
>>320862502
Realism I guess is the reason. I didn't imagine that witchy goblin guy wearing pants, and any time I tried to put a loincloth or something over his junk it just felt forced. Also, magic rituals are supposed to be done skyclad. Those are the only two of my 100+ pieces that have dongs in them though. As much as I love dongs, I don't try to shoehorn them in everywhere.
>>320862659
Are you? The key word here is 'convincing'. I'm not convinced.
>>320859062
Dante's Inferno Lucifer was hillarious.
The dong had it's own floppy physics.That's when I realized I have a fetish for floppy dicks.
>>320862763
Well I dunno, unless you can find a good story reason or are sexually theming it, maybe don't put it in the focal point or give it such high contrast, so its more of a 'its there if you care to look' kind of thing. At least so people wont get weirded out too much, moreso ones that are looking to hire you in the future.
>>320863025
Yeah, I bet Satan would look like that.
Why the fuck would Satan wear a loincloth?
This immediately came to mind.
>>320863075
Yeah I hear ya. I'm pretty sure that the reason anyone focuses on either of those two dongs I posted is just because they're there. They're not in your face, they're not a focal point etc, people are just so used to seeing eunich-monsters that a cock jumps out at them. My favorite eunich (the character is actually a eunich so no dong):
>>320861691
>>320861794
If you're gonna draw monster, then you shouldn't draw human-ish dicks.
If you look in the animal kingdom, most animal dongs are completely or partially hidden when not erect. Your dongs look like flaccid uncut dicks.
If the monster is mostly humanoid, and I don't mean just has 2 arms and 2 legs, I mean looks more like a human, than it's alright. But if they are so similar to humans, they most likely will have something to hide it. Not because "hurr sexual" but to protect themselves from the environment.
>>320862793
Just because you remain unconvinced doesn't mean his inspiration is false. Remaining steadfast in your belief that someone would draw a goblin with a dick for reason other then "well, that guy must really like dicks" when the artist has already explained himself says more about you then him. The dicks aren't really "prominent or pronounced" as you say, they're just there. You're literally the reason he draws dicks on harpies and eldritch horrors.
>>320863525
Yeah, I made an attempt at looking into fish dicks for that first one, but didn't come up with anything. Plus, it's a deep one, so human/fish hybrid. The second one is a goblin, which I would imagine have human dicks.
ITT: OP is obsessed with dicks
>>320863734
For good reason.
>>320863525
Deep Ones are known to mate with female humans though. So it would make sense they have compatible genitalia.
>>320863350
A lot of the SMT demons have dicks or tits.
It's fitting.
Dead Space had nice monsters
I'm surprised no one has mention the Penumbra series yet
>>320863974
That doesn't mean the dick needs to be humanoid.
A dolphin can mate with humans. Not impregnate, but can fuck.
The point is, for most species dicks won't just hang out in the open, balls flopping like they do for us humans. Even our balls get pulled more in when it's cold.
So some other species would have it different.
>>320864328
Yeah, you have a point.
Besides, since Deep Ones are swimmer, they would probably have a retractable dick to swim better, like sharks and dolphins like you said.
>OP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjzC2DRgEo4
>>320864328
What about just a sheathe then?
>>320864842
>subtly hidden wiener
>>320864981
Where? I don't see it.
>>320861691
Saved.
Thanks Anon, that's neat.
>>320864981
I don't see it.
The final encounter in Amnesia has plenty of old man dick for you.
>>320865671
But you can't look at them without losing your SANITY.
>>320865145
Awww thanks
>>320859062
OP is just begging for monster dicks, you disgusting pervert.
/thread
>>320865974
>/threading yourself
>>320864509
>>320859062
If mutation would to happen, The penis would probably be the first thing to fall off.
the only reason it stays on your body is because morning wood stops it from shriveling off.
>>320861691
>>320862214
To be fair, a fucking damn lot of animals have penis or genital organs that are only visible when copulating. Sheated penis are extremely common in many subphylum or classes. Some even don't have, like most of birds, for instance, which reproduce with cloaca.
So putting penises on bird-like monster, on lizard, fish, or amphibian like creature or whatever make little sense and don't help to be more believable. Same for mammals : Many of them don't have an "always external" dong, though externals balls are more frequent.
I'm perfectly fine with a visible penis on a humanoid-like creature such as a goblin, or like in >>320861794
, or modeled from an animal which have, but putting one on everything just for the sake of it is a bit counter-productive
>bloodborne monsters
>anatomically correct
Bloodborne monsters are just hideous, they take a random animal and fill it with spare body parts, maggots, dirt and blood.
I unironically prefer Souls games monsters to Bloodborne monsters. They were more elegant.
>>320866952
You are correct but a lot of games feature human-based mutant/monsters. Or mammalian monsters.
>>320866952
Artistanon here, and I agree. I do like Giger-esque creepy sexual horror art though, too, but in a more subdued fantasy genre piece I wouldn't go tossing dicks around all willy nilly. If I'm doing death metal album art (which I hope to do one day), then it's dick city.
>>320859062
Why you wanna be looking at dicks, you a faggot or something?
>>320867718
Nah I think vaginas should be represented too.
>>320867982
Whatever, go look at dicks on your own time, fuccboi.
>>320867601
And I do agree with that. Most of games avoid that like they are afraid of being R-Rated or something, like other anons said before in this thread, and restricting their playerbase.
But the problem is not always on the dev side, media and public are also sometime fucking retarded. Wasn't it for Oblivion that some people/journalists threw a fuss because you could see horses buttholes ? I mean come one, it's just a fucking horse asshole, get over it.
>>320867713
I do like some Giger, but, man, sometime he went wild as fuck with sexuality. While I'm not a expert at all, the pictures from him I know (well, aside a few landscape) seems to ranges from the "subtle sexual hints or mild creepy nudity" to "Full obvious sexual picture sprinkled with just a tiny bit of weird thing". I like his the first option better, even if I don't gives a fuck with the second. It's just less appealing as art for me.
I liked the picture you posted, though they have nice feeling to them.
>>320868808
Where is the butthole though
>>320868874
Thanks, not my best work, but whatever. And I agree with you about Giger, a lot of it is just super obvious dick-in-pussy with weird alien textures over it. It's amazing how long it took me to realize that too.
Why would a demon need to breed?
>>320859851
>>320860050
>>320860376
because if american children see what a real uncircumcised penis looks like then they'll start asking questions and become curious as to why theirs is different, which will make them not give their own kids the operation
>>320869615
>Seeing smelly yurocuck monkey cheese will make them not give their own kids the operation
>>>/reddit/
>>320871098
thats just a codpiece
>>320871328
>>320859851
Japanese games never have nudity unless it's a disfigured monster's tits or a penis on wheels.
>>320871957
They don't care about animal anatomy as much as western world though. Plenty of animals are anatomically correct in jap games.
>>320859062
that thing looks like a mess, its way too over designed. you cant even tell whats going on with it.
>>320872421
>that thing looks like a messThat's the point
>you cant even tell whats going on with it.That's good horror
>>320872421
It's a skeletal werewolf with a veil on its head.
Bloodborne has overdesigned monsters but this isn't one of them.
>>320872573
wtf thats not good horror, its just being confused.
>>320872684
Do you think jumpscares are good horror
