this morning we talked about it....let me summarize
>devs can implement always online drm on future games
>inb4 bypassing this
try diablo 3 or titanfall
also each dev can choose different ways of implementing online drm...making a universal patch impossibru
>>320523246
Microsoft tried always online and it backfired hard, you know.
>devs can implement always online drm on future games
Isn't this what fucking killed the xbone
Somehow I don't see every single game bothering to set up custom drm. Sure, maybe the big triple AAA titles, but then again you could just play thoseon pc
and that day the PS4 became what the xbone was going to be at launch until people cry about it.
>implying this will ever happen
>implying it would happen because of piracy of all things
You're a fucking retard
Explain to me how that wasnt always the case
>>320523246
Please stop calling running any sort of unsigned code "jailbreaking". This is as bad as calling any piece of software "app".
>>320523415
That's only because they hadn't sold the console yet.
>>320523872
This. Shitty terminology that doesn't need to circulate as much as it does.
>>320524131
ignore him. he is baiting.
on x1 and ps4 devs can choose to make online drm
online drm can also be masked as mp
>>320524131
Even so, implementing always online DRM to stop a couple of pirates is not worth the bad PR.
I guess it would depend on how easy it will be to pirate games on the PS4. If it is like the PS3 then it will not be rampart enough to hinder software sales. If it is as easy as say, like, the Wii, then there's probably some serious security flaw with the system and I doubt there would be enough DRM to stop that sort of piracy without completely butchering actual consumers.
Of course, the latter is very unlikely to happen. The latest kernel exploit only goes up to systems on 1.70 something.
