Other than disc space, this is pretty well-optimized.

There's going to be shit anti aliasing and texture options.

Nah.

File: 1416092071048.png (159 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]

159 KB, 1000x1000

>>320457612
Source

>>320457612
What game is this

>>320460334
Dark Souls 3

http://store.steampowered.com/app/374320/

>>320460081
Steam page.

>>320457612
>minimum 64 bit OS
'Bout damn time. Only shit-tier office computers still use XP, no reason to keep bottlenecking on the 4GB limit.

>>320457612
>only needs a 750
>'shit port'

wut.

>>320460956

>shitty optimization
>good port

>>320460956
Requirements will stay stagnant for awhile because consoles. We might get a few extra features but the most we will get is a much better looking smoother running console looking game

>game comes out with bloated requirements
>Recommended graphics: Nvidia 900 series
>shit port

>game comes out with reasonable requirements
>recommended graphics: nvidia 700 series
>shit port

There's no pleasing you fuckers.

>>320461310
That was true last generation as well. Dark Souls 2 running at 60 FPS on PC was fantastic. I'll gladly take that again if nothing else.

>>320461580
>Dark Souls 2 running at 60 FPS on PC was fantastic

But it broke the engine

>>320461580
Same here I really don't mind since I've got a little dated setup - i73770 and an hd7870, may not have to upgrade for awhile and when I do it will most likely be a used $150 290 on kijiji in a year

>>320461827
That was the first game. DS2 had no problems.

>>320461886
No, weapons broke faster at 60fps because the engine counted the wear on them as "Twice the frames, twice the duration damage".

>>320457612
>Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 750
that's the opposite of shit port
if you can't spare 50gbs of space then maybe pick up another hard drive

>>320461972
took them a rerelease on next gen platforms to fix that shit

>>320461972
Ooooh that's right. I completely forgot about that.

Was a small annoyance in my playthrough but that was still ridiculous. You're right anon.

Nevermind. Shit game. Installed, took a magnet to my hardrive, threw my computer out a window, set the house on fire, called the cops, etc.

>GTX 465 min
I'm guessing it's time to upgrade my GTX 460. There hasn't been a game I haven't been able to run so far, but then again I don't really play AAAs.

can't wait, my 2012 PC with a 3770k and 7970 is still good enough to play any game i want

>>320462494
Except Bloodborne.

>>320462654
good thing i also own a ps4

50 GB is about the norm these days. Probably the exact same size on consoles.

>>320461883
>AMD HD7870
Muh nigga. Noticed it was the minimum requirement for Witcher 3, though I haven't played it yet. Stress tested it with 2 when I first got it, though.

>>320457612
If really like to know how these shit monkeys are consistently consuming 50GB for games since 2014. This shit is new but games aren't any better, larger, or prettier.

>>320463784

Blame consoles, Bluray and eurobarges. Thanks to those, compression is dead, so now there's plenty of room for all those uncompressed cutscenes in every goddamn language under the sun that nobody speaks because pretty much everyone of importance speaks English.

>50gb
this shit has to stop, if they want to go digital they can't bloat the shit out of their games with uncompressed audio/video/textures.

>>320463784
50 gigs of space to install, not 50 gigs of actual game.
Unpacking, dog.

>recommended : 750 and i7 2600

so how does that mean it's gonna be a shit port? those are 2011 tier specs

File: 1362978327696.jpg (152 KB, 800x445) Image search: [Google]

152 KB, 800x445

>>320463784
Essentially they realized optimizing for pc is a waste of time considering how few actually buy games at all so they slap together a half-assed port while working on the consoles versions that actually generate revenue.

>>320465357
>implying that console peasants buy games
You do know that when you resell your console gaymes, and this is what you do, the developers get zero money.