4K Gaming
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
Im getting pic related delivered in a couple of days.
What are the best games to get to use the 4K well?
http://www.samsung.com/nz/consumer/monitors-printers/monitors/uhd-monitor/LU28E590DS/XY
>>320379181
Any games you have.
>>320379181
None, unless you have dual titans
>>320379394
I have something called Integrated Graphics. Will that be enough?
>panel type: TN
Fucking idiot.
>>320379630
EBIC MEEM BROSEPH
>>320379181
At least buy AMVA if you hate IPS glow that much.
>>320379630
I just wanna play Undertale in 4K, Will TN be ok for that?
>>320379391
No AA right? This looks quite good actually.
I thought /v/ was full of epic PC gamers with $5,000 setups. Where is all the monitor advice here?
>>320379962
Don't really remember.
>>320379905
No, TN is the worst for clean cartoonish colors, you may not notice it that much with videos and realism pursuing type of graphics but cartoons are terrible.
And fuck TN angles.
>>320380048
I have an ASUS PB287q, which is a VA panel type.
>>320380108
>>320379391
Screenshots I took.
>>320380257
Fiddle with the settings a bit and even MMO's look pretty good.lower resolution since it was my old rig.
>>320380048
>monitor advice
The only monitors worth getting are all memed out.
>TN panel
>60hz
>>320380394
What settings?
>>320380660
>4k
>anything above 60fps
>>320380728
I don't even remember, I had used a sweetFX for that but it was one I setup myself. Would have been over a year ago.
>>320380761
So you finally realized it's not worth yet.
>>320380809
Shame, my FFXIV has been looking like crap for a while now.
>>320380761
And that's why you shouldn't be buying it you stupid dummy.
Not to mention the fact that you can barely get 40fps with literally the most cutting edge GPUs on the market right now.
You have got to be a fucking retard to use 4k with anything other than an absolute monster rig which I am 87% sure OP does not have, or else he would have bought a better 4k panel.
And as I mentioned before, even if he did, his fps would still be 40 tops
>>320381024
>40fps
Well it depends on what you do, mine >>320380257 cost less then two 980 GTX,actually the cards cost me about 1 1/2 980 GTXand pretty much all games run over 90-100fps at 4k. I think the lowest I've seen was Star Citizen running at 45fps, but at the same time that was with max tessellation.
>>320381248
Nigga a 980 is not cheap, and one and a half is even less cheaper if i did the math correctly. Your rig would probably be considered a high tier rig.
>>320381248
That is literally impossible.
Post your specs, I remember watching the PC conference live and AMD revealing their newest GPU and it still would only barely do 40fps on 4k despite their entire marketing strategy was supposed to push 4k as if it was possible with current hardware (which it clearly is not).
And just to be clear, single GPU is needed for 4k because of massive microstutter that just ruins the entire experience if you have 2+ GPUs working in SLI.
I'd also like to see your benchmarks if you have it available, until then I'm going to assume that you are full of shit.
>>320381546
>cheap
I consider it cheap for what it does, I got each 290 for $285 last November, right after the 980 released.considering it's been over a year and I can still sell these cards to make a profit, I considered it damn cheap
>>320381557
>impossible
>>320381738
I'd like to see your ingame benchmarks, it could be that you are playing games that don't require that many resources, the benchmarks I saw were on AAA titles, and I saw a lot of them with a variety of cards, none of them would break the 40-50fps mark in 4k, not even in SLI.
>>320381557
>massive microstutter
What's with this shit still? Microstutter is in the ms range, it shows up on tests, you don't visibly see it.
And I've never seen it on any of my multi-gpu rigs.
2x 1GB 6870
2x 3GB GTX 770
3x 4GB R9 290
>>320381873
right, I'm not going to run a bunch of benchmarks to please someone on 4chan, I've done that in the past, it's a complete waste of my time as you will respond with the usual meme.
huge waste of money bro
>>320379181
>Buying samshit screens
>ever
What the fuck is wrong with you anon?
>>320381024
>Doesn't know dick
I run everything I play at 2160p. Very few games give me an issue getting a solid 60fps.
>>320381873
Yeah, bullshit.
One of the only games I have that doesn't run upper 50s-60+ in 4k @ max is Lords of the Fallen.
The following run fine.
>Witcher 3
>Just Cause 3
>Fallout 4
>Divinity OS
>DoA5LR
>GITS: First Assault
>MGSV
>Borderlands Pre-Sequel
>Dragon Age 3
>Dirt Rally
>Grid Autosport
>Tales of Zestiria
What else have I bought this year... I mean shit, I can only think of a few games that DONT like 4k and they're unoptimized dog shit.
