>Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game
>10 endings slides, 9 of which are variable
>Fallout 2
>20 ending slides, 13 of which are variable
>Fallout: New Vegas
>30 ending slides, 28 of which are variable
>Fallout 4
>5 ending slides, 1 of which is variable
>>320067843
Your point is that fallout: obsidian 2 will have 40 ending slide with like 35 variables and fallout 5 will have 2^3 ending slides and no variables?
>>320069195
[Intelligence] So you post the shit post with your computer on /v/ - Video Games.
>>320069340
His point is to shitpost about Bethesda like all obsidiandrones do.
>>320069391
>>320069365
>Telling the truth is shit-posting
>>320069638
kek
>Fallout 1
>Boring, turn based garbage
>Fallout 2
>Boring, turn based garbage
>Fallout 3, NV, 4
>Good video games
I think it's a pretty fair trade
Less stats for actually being fun
>>320067843
Yeah, the two variable slides in FO4 are pretty pathetic to boot.
If you blow up the Institute:
>I can feel it all wash over me. The heat. The force. The radiation . . . the fear. It's the end of the world - all over again.
If you don't:
>I've lost Shaun - all over again.
>>320070081
Sounds like their mission of getting the Call of duty audience worked
>>320070363
Just play a board game if you want to play boring turn based crap
>>320070081
RPGs are not intended for people like you
I hate what Bethesda and Bioware have done to bring in people that think like you do
>>320070878
Ok kiddo, hope your parents get you that new CoD
>>320071284
Good thing Fallout is an RPS now nerd
>>320071318
I bought Blops3 with my own money tho
I tip my fedora to you for pretending like CoD games are inherently bad tho
>>320071683
wtf is an RPS? I know you're just baiting but I've never heard of that, is it role playing shooter?
Why Obsidiots are bothering with the shitposts now? It is not like Bethesda will ever give Obsidian another chance to make a Fallout game, what are you even accomplishing here?
Bethesda already got success with the Fallout 4 release, it is not like they care about you Obsidrone crpgs faggots.
>>320071840
Yes
Also none of that is bait.
Sorry my opinions have triggered you
Maybe they'll port Monopoly to the PS4 or something of you want to play shitty RNG based games
>>320071683
>RPS
>>320072090
Bethesda are a business and as a business it would be incredibly dumb not to with how successful new vegas was.
Fallout 4 is the worst game in the series, I'd rather play New Vegas.
i've enjoyed every fallout game with the exception ofTactics.
fite me
>>320072337
Todd can shit in a can and call it Fallout and he will sell 10 million copies. He doesn't need Obsidian for anything.
>>320072337
Was New Vegas a huge success compared to Fallout 3 based on overall popularity and copies sold?
>>320069638
At least post actual quests, not the randomly generated ones.
It would still be exactly identical to this, but at least it's more honest.Not that this isn't honest either, but it makes FO4 look worse if you show parts they put "effort" into
>>320072337
New Vegas didn't get a metascore high enough for Bethesda to even bother
>>320072702
Exactly, as long as the fallout name is on it the game will sell. Why spend time devoting recourses and time when you can pay someone else do it and make a profit. Then they keep working on next elder scrolls. Why do bethtards think there won't be another obsidian fallout?
>>320072671
What makes tatics so bad? Ii like the idea of being able to control your compaions.
Fucking grampy bone pulling out a knife when he has a super sledge.
>>320072671
but that was the best game!
>>320072972
>>320072972
It has the same as fallout 4 with a much higher user score. F4 has a user score of like 5. I don't think metascore is an accurate representation but you brought it up.
>>320072850
No. It didn't even generate a MetaCritic score high enough for Bethesda to give Obsidian a bonus.
>>320071683
bruh everyone makes fun of cod don't be a hipster
>>320073047
You don't even realise it is Bethesda that made Fallout series popular by buying the ip from Obsidian.
If Bethesda hadn't bought the ip, no one would be talking about Fallout now. I don't even think Obsidian would have continued the series.
>>320073085
i respectfully disagree
>>320070081
>>320071683
>>320069638
why does it leave out the angry, happy, sarcastic delivery that accompanies these lines?
Without that it's tough to know how the npc is going to respond.
Shitty mod is shit.
>>320073378
>what is NMA
>what is van buren
>>320073753
shit games that sold 0 copies?
>>320073378
I always wonder if people who keep saying this realize that the Fallout IP was sold to the highest bidder (Meaning without Bethesda, someone else would have bought it regardless) or if they just choose to ignore it.
>>320073853
NMA isn't a game it's a community that would be talking about Fallout without Bethesda.
Van Buren was never for sale, it was 80% complete before it was stopped and Bethesda purchased the rights.
>>320073853
haha oh wow.
> Obsidian won't make an another Fallout game
This is true. FNV received very poor reviews compared to Fallout 3.
What makes you think if Obsidian makes a new Fallout game it will do better than Fallout 4?
>>320072665
I actually agree with you anon.
It's fun, but it's not something that makes me think "wow, they really out did themselves this time"
>>320074180
after the witcher 3 people want choices and decent writing in rpgs Bethesda clearly cant do it so at the minimum they might outsource the writing
