So is this a dead game now?
>>320023163
might as well be
its a glitchy mess with terrible net code
>>320023163
nope
its the one of the best shooters released in years
>Bugs
>Shit netcode
>Ubisoft
Yep
dead on arrival
>>320023163
isnt the tickrate like 5?
Head over to the general and join the fun
>>320023163
Are you weebs this mad that even when Ubisoft doesnt even try or give a shit still makes a better port and netcode that your beloved chinks?
>>320023857
the netcode is crap though
>mfw been playing this daily for the last week
It's great
>>320023971
>the netcode is crap though
still better than BF3 & BC2 and any fighting game released.
Or are you gonna saythat Mortal Kombat, Guilty Gear, DOA or had better netcode?
>>320024259
given the fact that im constantly shot through metal walls and not a single one of the killcams i've seen actually fired at where i was I'll say yeah its really bad
on top of that i cant connect to more then 2 matches at a time
and thats when I can actually connect to the ubisoft servers
so yeah siege's online is probably some of the worst i've ever seen in a video game and it blows my mind that anyone even thought it was okay to release
>>320023527
If you're a gullible memespouting /v/edditor, sure
>The current servers run at a tick rate of 64, but the position of players is updated 30 times per second. We have plans to address this very soon and are currently running tests in which we have a position update rate of 60
>>320024259
>still better than BF3 & BC2 and any fighting game released.
it's not, though.
you can win the game by lean-peaking because you can find and shoot someone a whole half second before they see your barrel.
it's so easy to abuse the netcode, ranked is a joke.
>>320023163
It was dead since beta
>all these desperate shitposters desperate for a game to fail so they have something to shitpost about
Get a life shitlords :^)
>>320024460
Ubisoft clearly said that killcams arent accurate.
And the rest are related to you only.
Because i never had problems joining to a mach or ubi servers.
>>320024634
Im gonna prefer Ubi netcode over BF3 & BC2.
Because at least with Ubi my bullets are registered in time, not seconds later.
>>320024758
There is not a single person I have ever met that can connect to ubisoft's servers right away
Everyone I've talked to about the game have to wait up to minutes just to be able to connect
on top of that the glitches in the game are fucking crazy
falling through maps
spawning in the ground so you cant move
being able to kill people if they are too close to walls since their limbs can clip through it
this game is fucking ridiculously bad
>>320023385
>>320024574
>>320024253
>>320024741
this game will be dead in a month and it will be very obvious with long search times and it will only get worst from there
disagree, call me a shit lord, or whatever to make yourself feel better. just know your future
>>320024741
Hello Ubisoft marketer
Why should I buy the new rainbow six?
>>320024758
>Because at least with Ubi my bullets are registered in time, not seconds later.
sure, the latency in BF sucks, but it's 100x worse when it's poor latency in small-team 1 life games. Dying in BF matters very little when you respawn 10 seconds later and lose very little from it because the other 31 people on your team are on the objective. Poking around a corner and killing 2 of 5 people means you've won the round pretty much.
>>320023163
>Uplay
dead on arrival
>>320024983
no you just have shit internets only
the only bug that i had once was my drone falling through the map
all i understand is that your internet is ridiculosuyl shit
>>320025008
yeah just like how Battlefront will be dead in a month
am i right? ;^)
yet its has almost as many players a BF4
>>320025129
It seems like you dont play with a team of friens and just try to be good alone with randoms.
kek
I really like this game and the system to unlock the characters isnt jewish at all, surprisingly. Matchmaking is really fast but the netcode can be just ridiculous: very often you just die and then you see a killcam yourself standing still while a guy just walks in front of you and shoots you in the head.
Anyway I wouldnt say the game is dead because the average queue time is like 3 seconds to get a match. If you want a dead game look at evolve
>>320025269
>all i understand is that your internet is ridiculosuyl shit
>IT DIDNT HAPPEN TO ME SO ITS NOT A PROBLEM
Uplay i known to be one of the worst things to connect to
its so atrocious
and none of the other thigns i listed have to do with bad internet
>IT DIDNT HAPPEN TO ME SO IT DOESNT HAPPEN EVER
Whatever you say Mr.Marketer I'm sure you'll get someone to buy it
>>320025069
Simply epic, enjoy your pathetic miserable existences shitposting on an anonymous image board.
>>320025269
can you put on a tripcode so I can filter you ubisoft marketer
THunt is still fun
Won't die because free maps, free operators etc.
Its a MP only game where they don't go full retard
>>320025269
>It seems like you dont play with a team of friens and just try to be good alone with randoms.
I play with 2-3 stack, how is that relevant to the fact I cant win rounds just by corner peaking on the objective and clearing rooms?
Defending is even easier. 4 of the maps let you just run to one of two windows and instantly murder any attackers running to you.
>yeah just like how Battlefront will be dead in a month
Battlefront is dead though. No new-release AAA multiplayer-only game should have <200k people online in the first month
It's a shit game. Stop trying to defend it, you're starting to look sad.
>>320025008
>this game will be dead in a month
>game has as many players as Battlefront on steam only
Just to help you out.
That player count is almost as many as BF4 and the multiply of any previous BF game that is so good and "highly played".
>>320025269
>battlefront almost as many players a BF4
>comparing a 2 year old game to a month old one to defend his point
>>320023163
I honestly wanna buy it but I heard some pretty dissuading things about it, so I'll have to pass. Shame, cause it looks pretty cool, honestly
Did they fix it so that it isn't as obnoxious to go from one match to another?
>>320025656
Its really bad and there is only like 5 levels
its pretty underwhelming
>>320025635
Im comparing a game that was bought by a few thousands vs bought by millions.
The latter is BF4. ;^)
Oh and if i have to compare to current ones.
Then Rainbow Six Siege is the most played latest FPS availiabe.
>>320025008
>this game will be dead in a month
Sure it will kid, sure it will.
You are a sad little child who sits on /v/ all day shitting on games wanting them to all be the blunder of the century and fail just so you have something to shitpost about.
There is nothing which says this game will die in a month, nothing what so ever.
Ubisoft have already said they are fixing things and plan on releasing a patch mid December, so next week sometime.
You keep being the shitlord you are shitposting away about every game being dead and the blunder of the century.
>>320025750
Not really
you still lose connection every other game
you still sometimes have a chance to not load the character menu and cant choose your character
people still leave while waiting for a new player to load so it can take up to tens of minutes to get into the game
It's a stillbirth, but some mental rejects will still find some enjoyment out of it.
Then again most people here would smear themselves with faeces if it came with a AAA marketing campaign.
>>320025840
>There is nothing which says this game will die in a month, nothing what so ever.
you mean other then its bad with a terrible net code right?
>Ubisoft have already said they are fixing things and plan on releasing a patch mid December,
yes thats a good idea
you know
several weeks after the game is out
honestly dude the damage is done
>>320025840
>people are this delusional
christ its titanfall all over again. they were so positive in the first week though
>>320025836
>;^)
>>320025836
>Im comparing a game that was bought by a few thousands vs bought by millions.
Battlefront had 13 million sales projection. Stop shit posting.
>>320025269
>yet its has almost as many players a BF4
BF4 has been out for years. Rainbow Six and Battlefront won't even have servers up by the end of next year.
>>320023163
>60$ multiplayer only game
They never fucking learn. Only Cowadooty and Cowadooty: Tanks Edition (aka modern Battlefield) can pull this off on the current market.
I'll actually buy it if more than 5 people play it by the time it gets a 50% discount on steam.
>>320026024
>several weeks after the game is out
>honestly dude the damage is done
Oh, right.
You forgot to tell that to DICE and BF4.
OH also
You forgot to tell that to DICE and BF3 before that.
>>320026194
difference is, those games are actually good once you fix the issues.
>>320023527
Where the fuck did this tickrate meme come from? I literally never heard the term until a few weeks ago.
>>320026024
isnt this shit what a beta is fucking for?
doesnt mean shit to me though.
>getting shot through a 2 cm hole in the wall
>>320026165
>all these assets that cost millions to make
But
>game lacks content to justify $60
when will developers understand this
>>320026194
battlefield already had a huge as fuck following for the game
rainbow six lost most of its fans during the siege beta and even if they patch out the glitches and absolutely atrocious netcode there is still almost no content and the game is boring and repetitive even if they add 8 more operators theres still the problem of there only being about 6 levels in the game
>>320026304
>>320026165
CoD and Battlefield at least pretend to have a single-player component
>>320026394
That is why Hardline died and flopped way harder?
>>320026362
>getting shot through a 2 cm hole in the wall
worse than that, getting shot in the leg because they let models penetrate walls.
>>320026362
>release beta
>people complain about terrible netcode and glitches
>second beta release
>exact same problems havent been fixed and people continue to complain
>game comes out
>exact same problems havent been fixed and people still complain
>IT WILL BE PATCHED GUYS I PROMISE
I have absolutely no faith this game will be good
>>320026024
What a sad little child you are.
Just because there are problems with the netcode does not mean the game is going to die.
They are fixing it, the game has been out for two weeks, there is a patch coming next week.
ITT: the game I spent $60 has longevity! look, the numbers, the population matches 2 year old games!
the only sad part about all of this is that I won't be able to get the satisfication from calling all of you dumb fucks out after 90 days when this game is long buried because you'll dodge these threads like the plague
>>320026367
>all this marketing that costs millions to fund
ftfy
>>320026394
>about 6 levels in the game
that still 3x the amount of what MGSV has
>>320026491
Hardline flopped because its a bad game that didnt appeal to anyone
siege has a similar problem
its not as bad but its still dying
>>320025840
>There is nothing which says this game will die in a month, nothing what so ever.
other than the fact that it's trying to compete with CSGO despite being $45 more expensive and significantly more demanding hardware-wise.
>>320026491
Siege is basically flopping just as hard as Hardline. Absolutely nobody gives a shit about it already.
>>320026649
>$45 more expensive and significantly more demanding hardware-wise.
And 100% better
>>320026569
MGSV isnt an online only game and its also not even finished
whats sieges excuse
and don't give me that
>>320026712
doesn't matter if no one's playing it and the netcode is fucked
>>320026518
>go to twitch before i download the beta
fucking
payed streamers
everywhere
OH MAN I CANT WAIT TO PLAY THIS GAME OH THIS AND (other tom clancy game the MMO) IM NOT SURE WHICH TO BUY OMG
BOTH WILL CONSUME MY LIFE
>playing on ps3
fuck my life, plebs playin shit games gettin payed way too much
>>320026712
>>And 100% better
yeah thats why its riddled with glitches and has a terrible netcode and needs patches for something that should have been fixed months ago when the first beta came out right?
>>320023385
this.
But I'm afraid it's going to die.
>>320026783
You really know the game is shit when the paid streamers drop it the second they stop being paid and go back to actually decent games. Even Youtube/Twitch shills aren't pretending it's good.
>>320023385
>>320026867
It looks pretty dope but I don't want to drop $80 canadabux on an online-only game I will probably only play for 6-10 hours
>>320026520
>what a sad little child you are
kek'd
i bet you suck dicks too you fucking casual faggot
>>320026845
well at least my guns shoot where i aim ;^)
>>320027023
Doesnt matter when you fall through the ground for no reason
>tfw have a raging boner for counter-terror tacticool operator shit but this game is fucking awful
Unrelated, but why is Japan getting operators instead of South Korea?
>>320023163
This game is for casuals.
Seems like it would be so bad to play in tournaments.
>teams coming up with "shoot you through the wall" strats
>"oh and they meleed a hole in the wall!"
game over
>>320023163
>this game will be
>that game will be dead
>whoa shit ubi siege failure
>whoa jew EA and DICE Battlefront is the biggest blunder
>nobodies is gonna play it
>Battlefront on 3 platforms has more 30000 more people playing that BF4 over 5 platforms
/v/ shilords must be real mad
>>320023163
I still play it pretty regularly and get matches consistently
So I don't think so
>>320027112
>>320027023
play a real game you fucklords
>>320027214
we aren't talking about battlefield
>>320027214
A game that just came out has more players then a game thats been out for 2 years?
CALL THE FUCKING COPS
>>320027214
>Battlefront on 3 platforms has more 30000 more people playing that BF4 over 5 platforms
>Brand new game with overhyped movie tie-in has a handful more players during peak than a critically panned 2 year old game that has no long-term incentive
sure showed us.
>>320026649
>other than the fact that it's trying to compete with CSGO
But it isn't, keep being childish and thinking everything is a competition and my game is better than your game mentality.
>>320027017
Epic
>>320027294
like what
>>320026649
>it's trying to compete with CSGO
That could be true if CSGO would be a tactical FPS.
>>320027294
I do play real games
thats why I stopped playing siege
>>320027214
>implying the game didn't sell so well cus its FUCKING STAR WARS
>being this stupid
buddy i bet theres fuckin neckbeards out there that never played an FPS in their lives, and bought a console and star wars just cus its fuckin star wars
>>320026337
It just means how fast the server updates per second. Slow tick rate means slower response times, causing cheap kills that don't look like they hit you in a replay.
>>320027403
uhm
counter strike global offensive
>>320027421
Siege isnt a tactical FPS
The old R6 games were but siege has almost no similarities to the old games
>>320027451
>being a weeb
At least i am not retarded.
>>320027189
tactical shooters aren't for casuals, please go back to csno, you esport baby.
>>320027532
I thought you said real game
>>320025561
>>320025269
>R6:S All time peak - 12k, current 10k.
>Current battlefront PC players: 18k.
R6:S isn't going to be dead in a month, it already is dead. IT SOLD LESS THAT EVOLVE.
http://youtu.be/E4tNoVHr5
>40 minutes of shilling drama because of a shitty game
>>320027535
>Siege isnt a tactical FPS
well it isnt when you rush in like the retard you are
>>320027421
well, csgo uses team tactics. if you dont work as a team then you fucking lose.
rainbow six idk man
its all chance, you either run in a room and die or you dont then happen to see a dude facing the other way and get a single kill
>assuming you dont miss 4 out of every 5 shots cus your games netcode is the worst
>>320027679
siege is as tactical as CS:GO
the only difference is that you get SUPER SKILLS
not walking into traps isnt tactical its just not being stupid
>>320027421
>tactical
Rainbow Six Siege isn't any more tactical than CS:GO, Quake or any other shooter. It has very little depth and is nothing like previous Rainbow Six games.
Fat fucks that have terrible reflexes and shit aim only like to claim it is "tactical" to make themselves feel better.
>>320027623
>R6:S All time peak - 12k, current 10k
>steam only
So it is true that Siege does have more players than BF.
![990f4cb1d9[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/JSP0CQt.png "990f4cb1d9[1].png")
>>320027630
you what
>>320027539
>at least im not retarded
so you admit that you wasted 60$ on a fucking shit game?
you sure you arent retarded?
>>320027451
That would explain why I'm rocking a 20+ K/D and most players can't aim for shit. I've never seen an FPS with worse players.
>>320026337
Probably because you don't play FPS games, or don't play FPS games with any kind of appreciable skill.
>>320024574
I am so tired of /v/ calling everything reddit it gets so old after the first 1000 times
>>320027421
>tactical
people still believe this about R6?
>>320025008
What long search times? I find matches instantly
>>320027831
My bad
https://youtube.com/watch?v=E4tNoVHr5iI
>>320027864
>wasted 60$ on a fucking shit game?
i payed ~35$ for an excellent game that im having tons of fun with
>>320027535
Siege is a tactical shooter
>>320027816
Are you seriously suggesting that people actually buy games through ubisoft's shitty platform?
>>320028003
No it isn't
based on the way it plays? its almost not tactical at all
also
>wikipedia
>>320027717
>its all chance, you either run in a room and die or you dont then happen to see a dude facing the other way and get a single kill
It's like you haven't even played RB6.
I bet you're Bronze 3 too.
>>320027937
Deal with it or go back to reddit, redditor.
>>320028014
You're the retard here
>Buy the game ANYWHERE except for Steam
>Get uPlay key
Why would anyone be retarded enough to buy it on Steam to get DRM on DRM?
And why pay 60 bucks at overpriced Steam when you can get it elsewhere for 30 bucks?
>>320028014
yes and also phyisical copies and keysites sell uplay keys
not steam keys
but i guess you have no common sense to realize this
>>320027764
siege is too hard desu.
considering netcode and every wall being destructable.
anyways who gives a shit, go back to wasting 2 minutes every single round with a fuckin RC car then getting one tapped from a corner you never seen or a 2 cm hole in the wall.
>btw after you die, wait another two minutes just to get into your rc car again
>>320023163
>new update turning ranked into a casual shit fest
It might as well be.
>>320027535
>>320028070
So fucking tactical right here
>>320027880
play csgo faggot
only cool thing about star wars is fuckin light sabers.
> ,/,,
>>320027717
"I played once and died therefore the game is shit": the post
>>320028070
>its almost not tactical at all
Maybe if you play with a bunch of dumb fucks because you were too lazy to bring in your friends.
>>320028318
>siege
>casual shitfest
yeah, good luck winning with randoms against organized teams
>>320028071
yeah, you bet i installed the beta and thought it was a piece of shit.
> mad cus you wasted money
> mad cus you wasted money
> mad cus you wasted money
> mad cus you wasted money
>>320028394
He didn't even play it, he is just repeating something he saw someone else say to try and fit in.
>>320028501
you got me!
>>320028458
>doesn't read the post or know the context
>replies anyway
Kill markers, grenade indicators, teammate outlines, and threat indicators all coming to ranked because shitty players were crying that ranked is too hard because you actually have to pay attention to what you are doing.
>>320028232
>>320028249
>Ubishills are this delusional.
Steam's market share dwarfs key sellers so heavily that they practically don't exist. I would have taken you more seriously if you had stuck with people buying through ubisoft's platform.
>durpa shit netcode
Gitgud, faggots...
Stop blaming your shit skill on a problem every FPS has...
>>320028496
>> mad cus you wasted money
This is my favourite meme
>shitposter shitposts about a game
>people BTFO
>b-b-but you are just mad because you bought a game you enjoy playing
:^)
>>320028003
Every time someone posts that fucking picture it makes me puke.
Siege is far from tactical shooter and posting a screencap from a wiki site is a worst way to counter that argument.
>>320028706
>no source given
uplays market share twice of steam's
>>320028713
0/10
>>320028713
>...
psh...nothen personel kid
>>320028737
got me again!
csgo is a superior game and always will be.
>>320028496
>Implying I didn't get it for $35
>Implying you're not shitposting because you think it has no tactics
>>320028003
>uses wikipedia as source
not even casuals do this, this is a whole other level
>>320028901
yes, RNG requires tons of skill
you all sound fucking retarded lmao
>>320028706
Why would you buy a ubisoft game on Steam?
You still need to have Uplay installed to play it. So not only do you have to run Steam to start the game you have to run Uplay at the same time.
You can get a Uplay key cheaper than a Steam key as well, so why buy a steam key with double DRM for more money when you can buy a Uplay key for cheaper that only requires Uplay?
You shitposters are such dumb people :^)
>>320028960
>you could have spent that 35$ on something that doesn't look, feel and play like shit
yeah i bet you are having fun spending 60% of your game time in menus and fucking being dead!
> i am shitposting because it has no tactics
whats the tactics man, hide in a corner?
>>320028706
I know that Steamdrones like you are retarded enough to pay 60$ for the game.
But a lot of people like to get it for cheaper and some people actually buy retail
>>320028901
>memers
>rng spray
>revolver
Are you even trying?
Every. Single. Time.
When will people ever learn?
>>320029000
its not RNG actually.
so retarded.
how is it rng when sprays have patterns?
>>320028901
>csgo is a superior game and always will be.
Here is your reply anon.
CS:GO has nothing on Siege. They are both good games and very competitive.
But Siege has a lot more depth and content than CS:GO does.
>>320029115
>and fucking being dead
i see
you are shit at the game now have to get it out
as it was said
Siege isnt for casuals
>>320028014
>every game ever sold is tracked through steam
>consoles don't exist
I mean it's not rocket science
>>320029034
>namefag
>lmao
I'll bite.
>Joined an on-going game were the enemy was leading 2-0
>Decide to stay anyway and handle this shit
>Win 3-2 with 8 kills and 1 death
That was intense
>>320024460
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJV8RcyKqbQ
I warned you faggots but you didn't listen.
I told you back in alpha that the netcode was shit and wouldn't be fixed.
I told you in closed beta that the netcode was shit and wouldn't be fixed.
I reminded you again in open beta that the netcode still wasn't fixed a week before release. You went ahead and pre ordered it anyway.
Congratulations on your brand new dead game and thanks again for killing the industry by giving money to AAA devs who cater to the casual userbase because they're the ones with money
>>320029236
Not that anon but Siege is not a good game
Can't say I've played GO but Siege has some atrocious almost gamebreaking glitches and a terrible netcode.
>>320029150
????
how are any of those RNG?
how is that spray RNG, like i said it has a pattern. every gun has a unique pattern.
>talks about rng
>plays R6
>miss 4/5 shots cus ur netcode sucks cocks
>get one tapped through a wall (and the guys not even cheating)
buyers remorse
>>320029417
It's a feature
>>320029152
this.
this.
>>320029236
>more depth
>very competitive
why cus your whole defending team sets up like 10 traps / reinforced walls just to get blown the fuck out by one breach?
>b-b-but my razor wire!!!
>>320029236
> more depth than csgo
> more content than csgo
right.
you realise csgo has community servers right?
with infinite possibilities for gamemodes?
>R6 gamemodes
>wallbang deathmatch
>wallbang deathmatch
>miss 4/5 shots cus ur netcode sucks cock
>cus ur
>cus
>ur
>>320029603
Mmm, he's got a point though. CSGO is a low skill ceiling, casual arcade shooter. It has zero depth.
You can't just marginalize Sieges gameplay with green text as an argument against Sieges tactical depth, you just look like a fool.
That said, they're both shitty casual games. Siege is only just slightly better.
>>320028790
>Siege is far from tactical shooter
Explain how it's not. It's literally being marketed as a tactical shooter. You fuccbois are conflating your argument by mixing in the single player elements of the older games against Siege's multiplayer. The older games never had a planning phase for multiplayer and it was a clusterfuck. Siege's multiplayer does have a planning/preparation phase.
Already dead in Oceanic.
>>320029719
Game modes like what? Surf maps and some crackhouse/jail RP servers?
>>320029115
>yeah i bet you are having fun spending 60% of your game time in menus
But I can get a match in 1 minute.
>and fucking being dead!
Unlike you, I'm actually decent and don't die all the time.
>whats the tactics man,
Sweeping, recon, baiting with drones, deciding where to breach, 3-pronged breaches, roaming, c4, when to use Thatcher, etc.
>>320029890
>planning phase
>FOUND THE BOMB
boy what great tactics
>>320029719
I guess Skyrim is a masterpiece because of community made content by that logic.
>>320030148
sure as hell better then siege
>>320029890
I will never understand why people shit on Siege by claiming the old RB6 games were tactical when you can literally solo each mission as long as you were good by spraying everyone down.
>>320030107
>smoke double doors and rush B
HOLY SHIT MLG WATCH OUT
>this thread
Theres at least 2 people just shit posting and baiting very poorly and everyone is falling for it.
Just play the game and stop posting about it on /v/, if its remotely popular its automatically bad here.
>>320029890
>It's literally being marketed as a tactical shooter
>so its a tactical shooter
>>320026337
>Where the fuck did this tickrate meme come from?
Quake 3
>>320030236
>60 fps locked games
>better than anything
nope
>>320030107
Yes, that's literally what Rainbow Six emphasizes. Intel, recon, planning, and countering defenses.
>>320025347
>Matchmaking is really fast
bruh
Matchmaking is a mess 2/3 times I have to quit out and rejoin because it takes way too long to find two more players.
>>320030358
>it is a tactical shooter
>"it's not a tactical shooter"
I liked the beta but it had some glaring issues like shields that weild pistols that can 1 shot kill you by just spraying it. It basically made you have to use the nitro and most of the time you'd get 1 shot killed by the pistol before even having the chance to detonate it.
And then I sae a video where the entire attack team can go shield. Fuck that shit
>>320030513
Hmmm... Brother!
>>320030305
Getting a little defensive, are we?
Some people had the foresight to not buy this shit game(two alphas and two betas that were all pretty much open as long as you signed up at some point before alpha), and that's without even factoring in the fact that it's a fucking Ubisoft game. But as you can see, people who did end up buying the game are even complaining about it.
If you don't like your games being criticized, maybe you should hop on over to Reddit to circlejerk about it.
>>320029867
CSGO has one of the highest skill ceilings, what are you talking about?
What is your idea of a 'hardcore' game then?
>>320030358
>The developers are wrong in describing their own game
>>320029890
The game is far too arcadey to be a tactical shooter. Crying about it won't change that.
>>320030869
Halo, call of duty, battlefield
>>320029896
What game isn't dead in Australia
>>320030897
In this case they certainly are. If someone makes a racing game and calls it a puzzle game, they would be wrong.
>>320023163
It should have been an updated version of R6:V, keep the destructible environment and everything, instead of operators we buy gadgets. We get to make our character(s) and place them in their respective forces(FBI, GIGN, etc). The gameplay is otherwise a fine tuned R6:V.
>>320023163
As apparently the only person in the thread to have actually played the game;
It's very good, the game is very solid and plays well. The issues with "netcode" are exaggerated and only really an upsetting issue because the killcam sucks, it's not even close to accurate making it feel more bullshit than it is. Regardless, the issue has allegedly been fixed.
Player numbers are steady on steam and ubi doesn't release figures for uplay. Considering most people I know bought it from 3rd party re-sellers I'm inclined to say the actual player numbers are far higher than the steam numbers.
Search times are fine. It's 6am in Australia and I'm playing right now, picking up casual playlist games in ~1 minute.
DLC model is good, all maps/operators are free.
It's $60, but I've already gotten 100 hours out of it, so that seems like good value in my book.
As much as I love shitposting, Uplay really isn't that bad. It's not good and it's not as easy to use as steam, I'd say it's kind of like flies on a summers day. Yes, they are mildly annoying but there's nothing I can do about it and they really don't matter at all, they won't stop me enjoying this delicious BBQ.
Games very enjoyable and focus's a lot more on out thinking your opponent than out 'recoil patterning' them.
All 10 maps have 3 modes of and each of those has at least 4+ possible objective locations meaning there are potentially 120+ situations to play, and the amount of options for approaching those situations is only limited by your creativity. There are so many tools to use, so many options and combinations. The tactical flexibility afforded to you is enormous.
It's a real, team based game that promotes teamwork and communication, from what I've seen so far, the majority of the community is'nt full of toxic shits ala. assfaggots.
If you honestly decide not to buy (or try) a game that interests you because of /v/ shitposting, you're an idiot.
>>320030804
>people talking with purposefully poor grammar
>implying anyone shitposting even played it
ya man lets play a rainbow sxi from 10 years agao its still gud amirite? lol im a og gammer :)
>>320031102
0/10 bait
>>320030960
Oh okay, I see where this is going.
>>320031080
>Vegas
>Good
Those games are even less RB6 than Siege is. You might as well be playing Gears of War.
>>320030897
how new to the industry do you have to be to think that developers don't do this?
>>320031214
kill yourself
>>320031080
the fuck are you on about, siege plays nothing like vegas.
does cod play like quake because they're both fps?
>>320031102
Does ubisoft pay you in commisions?
>>320031214
You are hilarious, keep posting, your career in sucking dick is right around the corner.
>>320031305
I'm not the retard who is saying "IT DIDNT HAPPEN TO ME SO IT DOESNT EXIST"
>>320031214
>le siege is bad meme
upset that mummy wouldn't let you spend $60 on her credit card?
>>320031285
I don't there has ever been more obvious evidence that someone is new to games when they think that game devs won't lie about the genre of their product
its almost cute
>>320031317
reread my post you fuck wit.
I'm saying it should have.
>>320023163
I played it and liked it. But it's one of those games where you have to playwith friendsto have any sort of fun. Most players on that game blow in from CoD and have no idea of strategy or tactics
>>320031102
>As apparently the only person in the thread to have actually played the game
It's cute that you think that.
>The issues with "netcode" are exaggerated and only really an upsetting issue because the killcam sucks
>it's not even close to accurate making it feel more bullshit than it is.
And just like that, any credibility you had went out the fucking window. The netcode is fucking atrocious and people are constantly killed behind cover. And no, not destructible cover. Even the devs have said it's a fucking problem.
>>320031430
seige fanboys cant even defend their game anymore
this is sad
It wont be dead, and here's why
>closest to a modern and accessible SWAT game
>most tactical game out right now which isn't either autistic military sims or meta style CSGO
>free dlc should keep the game chugging for a while
>fairly decent teamwork and small player sizes per match mean even depopulated the game is still playable
>scratches the itch of casual games without trying to compete with COD, while scratching the itches of tacticool players without becoming overtly stressful and/or competing with more established genre
the game has hit and fps niche market and therefore won't die until another tacticool SWAT-esque game replaces it
>>320031418
I'm not the retard who shitposts about a game he didn't play.
B8B8B8B8B8B8 LOL
>>320028014
The game is constantly sold out on GMG which only sells Uplay keys. G2A and Nuuvem also only sell Uplay keys. The only way to get a Steam key is to buy the game for full price off of Steam.
>>320030934
Whatever helps you sleep at night. Siege is still a tactical shooter.
>>320026337
>tickrate meme
Just because you're an idiot doesn't mean something is a meme.
>>320031494
>tfw playing cod with friends and pissing off the other team by camping a room as hard as we can
Blops 2 was amazing for camping. Even had a small disco ball to deny grenades amd emps
>>320031603
It's not. Keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better though.
This thread has confirmed my belife that anyone who defends this game is a shitposter.
>>320031491
I did, and you grammar is so fucking shit that your post still implies that
>The gameplay [of R6:S] is otherwise a fine tuned R6:V.
The whole idea of 'le reading comprehension XD' comeback relies on you being halfway fluent in the language you're writing.
>>320030038
Still waiting for a response.
>>320023163
I gonna wait until it is cheaper and has more free content before thinking about buying it
>>320023163
>$60
>online only
>half my time is spent trying to find a match
>a quarter is spent in glitched matches where people just run in place then get frustrated and commit murder suicide
>the rest is actually playing for a few minutes and either getting a shit team with no mics or a team where people are actually good
I like the game but I'm not touching it anymore until that patch comes out that allegedly fixes the shit netcode.
>>320031516
>I believe everything I see in a broken killcam.
>>320026501
>getting shot in the leg because they let models penetrate walls.
That doesn't happen in game. It's just a bug with the killcam replays.
>>320031686
I'm not saying that CoD is bad, it's just that less tactics are really involved in the average pub game.
>>320031716
>It's not
>Still not explaining why it's not a tactical shooter
>>320031543
You know it really is an accessible game. Never played cs well, but I do well enough in this game. Punching tiny holes and shooting at peoples legs to get an easy guaranteed kill is fun, though I guess not to the enemy team. It actually feels a bit unfair at times, but it works.
>>320031965
It has nothing to do with the killcam. People die while behind cover where it is impossible to be hit. Even the devs acknowledge that the movement for players is updated too slowly and they're trying to patch it soon.
>>320027717
>csgo uses tactics
"half go one way, half go the other" doesn't really count
>>320031430
tbqh
I think the $60 price point is the best thing they've done.
The amount of screaming children I've played with is almost-nil. By making it more expensive they've weeded out almost all the f2p shitters and screaming autists etc. The majority of people I've played with have been relatively mature and have an interest in playing the game cooperatively.
Infact, now I think about it, the game is shit, noone from this thread buy the game.:^)
>>320032063
Characters having fantastical powerups for one.
>>320032031
You can run like a headless chicken with a sniper and use it as a guaranteed 1 shot kill (on console with aim assist anyways).
It's devoid of precision skills, but movement skill is there. Knowing how to jump shoot and aim at the same time differentiates you from a begginer
>>320032029
>That doesn't happen in game. It's just a bug with the killcam replays.
I've died by tripping a kapkan trap because my characters leg clipped through the wall while prone. No, it wasn't a fucking killcam, stop this meme.
>>320032417
post proofs
>>320032287
>fantastical power ups,
Name one, Name the most 'fantastical'.
>>320032287
You're thinking of Black Ops 3, senpai
>>320032318
Aim assist is disabled in PvP even on console. You're either full of shit and never played or you only did the single player situations.
>>320032029
nah it does, I've killed a few people when their gun barrel or toe has clipped through a destructable wall.
Just follow the advice of delta in black hawk down and stay away from the walls.
I actually liked the game when i played it in the beta.
Well if i could actually connect to a game that is.
However the game is way to expensive, has very little content and it uses uplay.
>>320031848
I was talking about what the game should have been. Not is.
The closed alpha was a fucking mess.
The closed beta was a fucking mess.
The open beta was a fucking mess.
Surprise suprise, the release is a fucking mess. You have to be completely delusional or a total shill to deny that the game suffers from netcode problems. The devs themselves have come forward to say that the netcode is total shit and that they're "trying" to fix it. People are having difficulty even getting into games, nevermind actually playing them and when they do the shitty netcode makes it unplayable. Sometimes you get situation where everyone in the server has well over 150 ping. There are multiple bugs and crashes and AMD users can't even run the game properly apparently.
If you enjoy the game fine but stop swallowing Ubisofts filthy semen and just admit that the game in its current state is a fucking mile off from being stable.
>>320030028
nigga surfing is the shit
>>320032029
No it isn't, I have been killed by someone because my legs clipped through the wall and he was able to shoot my legs. Check youtube, people have put up multiple videos of it happening.
>>320025008
Funny how Vegas 2 still had people playing on 360 for years. Rainbow 6 games have a large group of long lasting players
>>320032704
Yep pretty much this. They removed all aim assist on snipers in both aiming down sights and from the hip, so there is nothing but nonstop funposting about shit they don't know.
>>320033327
It's just like RO2 where there will always be a solid group of players for years.
/v/ has a bad problem with thinking any game that doesn't pull the same numbers as CS:GO is a dead game.
Makes sense though, since /v/ are casual fucks who only play CS:GO anddrink the Valve Koolaid.
>>320033060
"Netcode" is fine at lower pings. If the whole server is ~50 the bullshit is very low. I regularly get into games where the whole server is below 50 ping and I live in New Zealand. It's only once you start trying to play at 150+ that the game starts to break. Sometimes you do get big ping shitters, but if I can find good games on a shitty island in the south pacific that doesn't get it's own data centre, I'm sure you can get some better games.
>>320033608
> /v/ are casual fucks who only play CS:GO anddrink the Valve Koolaid.
>every criticism of the actual gameplay is literally "it's not CS:GO"
You might be right.
>>320023163
I've been playing it all week.
Fun as fuck tbqf
I thought I'd regret it but I've been having more fun with it than FO4 and JC3.
>That satisfying feel when your team breaches behind the enemy while the enemy is trying to shoot your drone
>>320032525
>>320032624
Press F to barricade, every character having 2 bulletproof barricades on their person, Castle having magic bulletproof barricades of his own, IQ, Bandit, the medic guy that can revive himself, etc. They tried to justify it through gear but all of it is executed in the most video gamey way possible. That's not what a tactical shooter is like.
Characters being "downed" is another thing.
>>320030869
>Heaviest RNG spread of any FPS on the market
>Skill
Try again
>>320033321
All killcam replays familia.
>>320031192
You seem to be greentexting about yourself there.
>>320033910
I think you are mixing up tactical and realism.
>>320033806
>every criticism of the actual gameplay is literally "it's not CS:GO"
Are all fanboys this fucking dense?
>>320033910
>Fantasical
>All of the things you listed are actual real world things used by operators
IQ and Doc are the only ones with 'fantasy' concepts, but no one fucking plays them anyways.
>That's not what a tactical shooter is like.
Fun fact, real life SWAT does actually use sledge hammers for breaching in certain situations. They also have breaching shotguns too.
>>320034368
>All of the things you listed are actual real world things used by operators
They have medic guns that can revive people from death?
>>320034038
What's your point? The killcam shows the persons legs poking out of the wall and thus the person who killed them sees this and is able to shoot them in the legs and kill them. Are you just pretending to be retarded or are you actually a shill?
>>320033910
>Those things
>Fantastical
>Fucking listing Bandit's gadget
>Characters being "downed" is another thing.
Non-issue because you outright die 99% of the time.
>>320034475
>reading comprehension
>>320034475
>I have 0 reading comprehension
Also, it's basically just a shot of adrenaline. You can't revive people from death.
>>320030804
What do you want to talk about family?
R8 revolver?
Undertale?
Fallout 4?
Console wars?
The game just came out and it isn't overwhelmingly disappointing, memeworthy or blunderific. It's allowed.
>>320026337
Tickrate refers to how often a server sends and receives packets. Only reason people dont use 10000t/s is that it higher tick rate hinders performance.
