>tfw graphics card is dying
It's like reality is slowly being corrupted.
>>319999643
It's what you get for playing Eu4, honestly.
>>319999643
> not playing Hearts of Iron
How long have you had it?>EU4
Pic looks fine to me. You alright OP?
>>319999643
>meme universalis 4
why do all you /gsg/ memelords hate EU4 so much?
It's literally the first game you reccomend in the OP
>>319999993
It doesn't have enough dank memes.
>>319999993
It's for casual babbies from Reddit. I don't think we even read the infograph. Plus it has a mana system straight from Magicka
I've playing EU3 for a while. Should I try EU4? Is it more demanding in terms of hardware?
>>320000121
EU3 is superior (with Divine Wind expansion and mods such as Magna Mundi and MEIOU).
EU4 has some novelties and improvements (like better diplomatic options and more involved trade system) but I and a lot of other people feel some of the core systems are fundamentally broken.
>>320000291
EUIII isn't superior at all.
EUIV has a lot of problems, but EUIII has all of those problems and more.
>>320000392
whatever you say memelord
>>320000679
I'll meme your meme you meme meme memer.
meme
>>319999993
it's the most streamlined paradox title so there's not all that much complexity.
>>320000779
meme me harder mememaster
>>319999643
>tfw you're not dank enough to understand this game
>>320000832
meme off or I'll meme on you hard
>>320000793
More importantly, it simply feels incredibly restrictive with everything being tied to one completely abstract resource ("ruler mana").
>>319999643
Whats this different from civilization series?i only play civ 5 and still do but i find it bit complicated
>>320001174
After 200 hours I still can't play Austria
>>320001174
Well, for starters, it's pausable real-time rather than turn-based. Province-based rather than hex-based. No tactical component (armies automatically engage when in the same province, you don't have any control over combat). The presentation is historical rather than abstract (although mechanically EU4 is pretty much as game-y as Civ).
>>320001465
So its more complicated well i guess its i'll just stick with Civ 5 then
>>320001094
that's the average /gsg/ thread
a cancerous place indeed
are you me OP
my 4850 died playing Vicky 2 back in June
>>320001552
well i'm suited with the more independent civ 5 game style then, i love controlling my armies and devastating evrything on my path
