>There are people on /v/
>real, living, people
>some of them with jobs
>actual people
>who are genuinely
>honest to god
>FURIOUS
>and writing thousands of angry words on imageboards
>about not getting BIKINIS in every new game
>BIKINIS
you cant make this up
>There are people on /v/
Bold claims require solid citations. Where are yours?
>there are people on /v/ that aren't dictators of 3rd world countries that support censorship
baka senpai
skeletons report in
>>319928853
>go to subway in America
>order meatball sub because it's delicious
>travel to russia
>go to subway there
>walk in and order meatball sub
>sandwich artist says they don't have it on the menu
>you ask why since they have it in america
>sandwich artist says the subway menu for russia is different to cater to russian tastes
>you scream censorship
that's how retarded you sound like right now
You realise that most of this board is filled with socially retarded virgins? And their only way of seeing boobs is via pixels?
>>319928853
let's pretend for a second that this is actually censorship
and let's go one step further and say that bikinis were taken out of ALL games
just go to the beach dude
google bikinis
watch baywatch
dont panic, bikinis are still around
Wanting sex is a natural human thing.
It's only natural to want sex in everything.
Sex in vidya, sex in work, sex in food
>>319928992
>sandwich artist
ya blew it
if you want to see bikinis so bad why dont you just ask your girlfriend to wear one?
>>319929165
Employees of subway are literally called sandwich artists.
>All these people spamming threads defending censorship
Jesus at this point the conspiracy anons are starting to sound reasonable. You're pulling out all the logical fallacies like attacking the people instead of their argument.
>>319929129
How the fuck can you work sex into food?
/v/ is not your hugbox. Go away losers.
>>319929236
>conspiracy
lel
>>319928992
>food analogy
top kek
>>319929261Hot dogs
if bikinis don't matter, why remove them?
>>319929213
It would then turn into her asking me to buy shit.
Posting in a GHAZISHILL thread.
>>319929392
Because unlike virgin boners, decency does matter.
>>319928992
>Subway announce brand new sub that looks incredible, so fucking delicious
>Muslims in the USA who were never going to eat the sandwich anyway demand the bacon is removed from the sandwich because it's offensive
>>319928992
You should be ashamed of that analogy.
>>319929129
it's natural for WOMEN to want sex, and it's slut shaming to remove things they might be attracted to. men who want sex are objectifying pigs and probably pedophiles to boot.
>design a level with red walls
>post a demo, people like it
>decide after some dev time the walls would look better blue
>no reason from a gameplay perspective, just preference
this is exactly the same as the ass slap
>>319929501
>bikinis
>indecent
Fuck off Mudslime.
>>319929228
that sounds like sweden level retardedness
>>319929501
so bikinis ARE something that's worth getting upset over?
>>319929642
Epic
I bet you have lots of girlfriends in your basement
>>319929501
>decency does matter
Then why not ban bikinis in real life? Women choose to dress like that all the time, but when its in a game its bad?
>>319929780
Epic
I bet you have tons of female followers
>>319929236
A) we're being raided by reddit/tumblr and people actually think censorship is good
B) it's just people shitposting in typical "if someone else likes something I have to hate it as loudly as possible" /v/ fashion
I don't know which option is worse at this point
>>319929775
Women being objectified by mainstream media is.
Men not getting another totally-not-porn title isn't.
Not even b8ing
>>319929501
>girls wearing bikinis at the beach
>indecent
Uptight christian parent or radical feminist? I can't tell anymore.
>>319929780
jokes on you, i dont have a basementi actually have an ex that's a turbo-sjw and she is regularly, unironically, that hypocritical. i find it amusing.
>>319930049
ok but the point is, you're saying BIKINIS are a huge deal, right?
BIKINIS
>>319929753
>>319929941
>>319930163
Women choosing specific clothing is not a reason to hammer in the retarded notion that women are just sex objects.
Women voluntarily have sex too, but this isn't an excuse to spread porn everywhere.
Some women even like being treated roughly. This isn't an excuse to beat up a woman or even depict women getting beaten up.
I feel like a kindergarten teacher having to explain such basics.
>>319930049
>Feminists are the one that claim finding somebody attractive is treating them as an object, aka "objectifying".
I don't find objects sexually attractive, I find PEOPLE sexually attractive.
By claiming this objectifies them you're actually the sexist one.
Not even b8ing m80
>>319930564
Are you socially retarded?
There is a giant difference between finding women sexually attractive and relegating women to the role of something sexually attractive.
>>319930729
>Giving somebody a role means they are no longer a person, they are an object
I can't believe my CEO objectifies me every day, he gave me a role to fill and then pays me money. I feel so used, so dirty..
>>319928992
>Shitty food analogy that doesn't work in the slightest with heavily debatable context, including:
>Why the fuck would ANY country not have meatballs/thickened meat ground?
>How is not giving a shit about meatballs the same as hating meatballs enough to destroy someone's PR over it?
>Potentially useful socially motivated change =/= Proven economically motivated change.
Like clockwork
>>319930729
theres a giant difference between having an optional bikini for some fictional characters and "relegating women to the role of something sexually attractive."
>>319928715
I'm honestly not surprised, you sit down and talk to any person long enough, real life or /v/, and you'll find something completely minor and trivial or something that occurred so long ago that they'll be frothing mad about.
Growing up, one of my neighbors used to go on tirades about Roosevelt. It's been almost 50 years man, move on.
>>319930541
>Shitty analogy that works just as much the other way around, like what is women LIKE being idolized and treated as an object of worship and beauty aka the vast majority of humankind?
>>319928992
food analogy
>>319931216
If same thing was happening to men you'd be whining about muh pandering to gays and getting all uncomfortable.
But no, women don't deserve to be spared being treated like genitals on legs.
>>319930541
>>319930729
This doesn't feel like a troll but is as reasonable as one
>>319930541
>notion that women are just sex objects
>spread porn everywhere
>an excuse to beat up a woman or even depict women getting beaten up
nobody is arguing for those things though. what does any of that have to do with optional swim suits in a single video game?
>>319931323
Men like being idolized, so we should just put hot dudes in underwear EVERYWHERE! That would sure show men how much they are loved!
>>319931475
>implying Men aren't extreme portrayals of masculinity in gaming
>implying Men ever complain about it
>implying its not only done to point out hypocrisy
>>319931620
>men being portrayed as cool heroes
>magically the same as women being portrayed as animated blow-up dolls
>BECAUSE IT'S A WOMAN'S ROLE TO BE A WALKING BLOW-UP DOLL AND MAN'S ROLE TO BE A HERO!
Why do feminazis and GooberGobblers blame a single sex when it's both genders causing sex problems? Men are fucking idiots for drooling over polygons in a video game, and women are fucking idiots for getting offended at polygons in a video game.
Likewise, in real life, women are fucking idiots for wearing skimpy clothes, and men are fucking idiots for drooling over every woman with a patch of skin showing.
>>319931789
>Woman gets portrayed as a badass hero
>Women complain and call it a guy with boobs
No fuck you. You feminist faggots are literally never pleased.
>>319931789
>men constantly shown with physiques often impossible, or impossible without gross quantities of steroids
>often showing off muscles
>showing qualities Women find attractive like confidence and leadership
>>319931918
When has that ever happened?
>>319928992
except that they would introduce meatball subs in russia as soon as their customers wanted them
shitty analogy desu senpai baka
>>319928715
>Tfw you're not Anthony Burch
>Tfw you're not /v/
>>319931789
literally none of heroes were women, fuck off
>>319931475
>If same thing was happening to men you'd be whining about muh pandering to gays and getting all uncomfortable.
nope. i'm equally against this getting removed from Bravely Default
>being treated like genitals on legs.
i'm not arguing for that. what does that have to do with optional swim suits in a video game?
>>319931918
>find some rare strawman
>explain your entire point using said strawman
>women are the strawman! we should never listen to women! they don't know what they want!
Yeah, all women are a hivemind. Your mom too! She puts on a femtenna when no male is looking and communicates with the hive queen.
>>319931789
but the women in xenoblade do all the same cool heroic stuff in equally skimpy clothing as the men
>>319931930
>men are cool heroes
>women are sexy genitals on legs
>this is equivalent! totally! you see, because men are supposed to lead and women are supposed to be fucked and give birth, that's the natural order
>>319929095
>and let's go one step further and say that music was were taken out of ALL games
>just go to a concert dude
>google music
>listen to the radio
>dont panic, music is still around
>>319932786
>not putting on your own music when you play games
>>319929261
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OVJiKHjYqk
>>319928715
tbf most of them are not upset because they really miss the content that was removed (I hope), but because deem it to be censorship.
still kinda pathetic
>>319932781
>because men are supposed to lead and women are supposed to be fucked and give birth, that's the natural order
But it is? What's your point?
>>319932786
>being so autistic that you need to combine vidya and porn
>>319932781
but the women are cool heroes too
>>319932786
>le slippery slope
:^)
>>319928715
>about not getting BIKINIS in every new game
Absolutely nobody demanded that they get bikinis in every new game. Go back to spit swapping with the other hens in ghazi about the conspiracies against women in gaming.
>>319928992
>eating at subway
>>319931475
>you'd be whining about muh pandering to gays and getting all uncomfortable
Hahaha, no.
Let me put this in no uncertain terms: if every single male character in the entirety of human fiction from the dawn of time until the end of the universe was engineered for maximum appeal to women and/or gay men, I wouldn't care in the slightest.
>>319933903
>if terrorists attacked school I would beat them up!
>>319931592
>we should just put hot dudes in underwear EVERYWHERE!
Sounds good.
>>319933434
Its an argument from analogy, not a slippery slope. Not that a slippery slope argument would be fallacious in this context
>>319933903
>engineered for maximum appeal to women
>>319934103
>Not that a slippery slope fallacy would be fallacious in this context
>>319933992
what
>>319934127
What's your point?
>>319934237
You're talking about a hypothetical situation that totally isn't true and saying what would you feel based on what you feel right now.
You might as well say things like
>if I was addicted to heroin, I'd just go cold turkey and stop taking it, lol
>>319934414
You underestimate how little interest I have in male characters.
>>319928715
its not about me getting something.
its about others getting it and me not
I don't see a lot men being uncomfortable to the point that they shout, shame and attempt to censor media aimed at women's fantasies, no matter what these fantasies might be. They usually just stir clear of them, or enjoy with full knowledge it was initially made with them in mind. That being said, I'd be willing to accept an initiative to stop men from being uncomfortable around sexualized male characters if it means feminists will reciprocate it.
>>319934231
You obviously know what you're talking about. i concede.
>>319934364
he's a character aimed at what women are interested in and the everyone had a conniption fit over twilight being shit
>>319935050
>everyone had a conniption fit
Those people are dumb. I'm glad women are having fun with their sparkly vampire books and movies and I hope they get to enjoy many more sparkly vampires in the future.
>>319928968
Red Skelton standing by
>>319935050
Don't forget, all the people crying about how Cloud, and FFXV's cast looks homosexual and not manly enough.
>>319935561
or, speaking of final fantasy, any time a male character shows emotion like women would find appealing they're "emo fags"
>>319935561
>>319936047
We shouldn't be using those people's homophobia as a justification for anything.
>>319928992
I know Subway calls them Sandwich Artists, but it's still amusing considering they're usually sullen teenagers.
>>319932781
>repeating your point because you have nothing else
>implying there aren't cool female hero's
>implying Women are all sexualised
>calling Male sexual traits "cool hero's" to try and dismiss
>>319936462
>male sexual traits
>like being a strong leader
You fucking retard
>>319937443
>women aren't attracted to Men with leadership traits
Virgin detected
>>319938003
>leadership is a male trait
Virgin detected
>>319938242
>Doesn't know Leadership is a traditionally Male trait in a World where 99% of the leaders are Men
>>319938482
>gurls don't have brains lol
>gb2kitchen
>>319938603
>Has nothing to say so resorts to off-topic shitposting
Aaaand you're done.
>>319938242
nobody said that though
>>319928804
Underrated post.
