what happens if your game shows indecent bikinis on little girls but you're already in the process of testing it on the 3ds? should i censor it just to be careful?
>>319678056
Deffo。
Yup
You should post examples just so we can know for sure
Yup. That's saving you a lot of work. If you let it through, NoA is just gonna send it back with a complaint.
It's not censorship if you do it yourself.
You're making a decision. Pander to sad otaku weebshitter pedos who make buying decisions based on what gets their dick hard because they're terrified of trying to get into an actual relationship with a human being
OR
Is your game actually good enough to sell to real people? In which case, take the indecent little girl bikinis out and make money in exchange for making a good game.
If your game is shit, go with plan A and create a "controversy" so retarded shitstains lap up your garbage videogame in protest.
/thread
Make them 1000 year old lolis
>>319678056
I want to fuck that frog
>>319678310
this but without the bottom
>>319678056
you post them on chinese image boards for degenerates to masturbate to them.
now do it.
>>319678443
>It's not censorship if you do it yourself.
Literally self censorship you fucking faggot
>>319678443
>these shitty opinions
>/threading your own post
>>319678586
Grow up, and also kill yourself
>>319678056
>self-censoring outta fear
Don't do it, kero. Just don't do it.
>>319678532
Yeah, cut that out. Only subhumans want to jerk it to that.
>>319678443
How does someone speaking this much sense not go insane posting on /v/
Why do you even come here
>>319678652
You first you worthless imbecile
>>319678056
>self-censorship
lol
don't do it
think of all of the free publicity from all of the sjws
and if you dont ill just pirate your game
>>319678443
I swear, watching tumblr infect this site is horrible.
>>319678849
Stop replying to yourself
>>319678863
>making changes to something you're working on while keeping your audience in mind before it's even finished is self-censorship
Kill yourself you triggered faggot. You're literally worse than the SJWs at this point.
If I get playtesters to try my game and they tell me certain levels are terrible, me changing them isn't fucking censorship. And if I feel they're ruining "my vision" I can go do shitty paintings nobody likes and die poor.
Capitalism, page fucking one.
>>319678849
Please kill yourself. Do it today.
>>319678310
>>319678056
No, most shit gets censored because devs are too lazy to send an e-mail to ESRB. You could try asking how much lewd is allowed and only after that change shit if it fucks up any hope of selling the game. Considering your game is probably weeb shit, you shouldn't care about the rating unless you get something higher than Mature.
>>319678056
You've got nothing to fear outside of getting slapped with an M or AO rating and attracting the worst possible audience.
>>319678586
>>319678620
>>319679015
>not even slightly making any sort of argument in response
Of course not. He's right.
>>319679232
I thought OP was talking about revealing clothes, like fishnet one-pieces.
>>319678443
>people i don't like aren't real people
>telling other people to grow up
>>319679232
>stockings with swimwear
but thats not practical at all
>>319678056
Why would you censor it? Your taget audience most likely give no fucks about the age rating.
>>319679397
practical for my dick
>>319679397
It's very practical when it's purpose is to get my dick hard.
>>319679397
funny, it worked for me
>>319678056
If you're localizing something, you'll appease more people by not changing anything.
Well obv...is the game good? Don't worry about the artwork assets.
Negative publicity is good publicity. Never back down. NEVER*
* - unless complaints are legititmate qualms about game mechanics. Outspoken people get energized by being outspoken, whether they are are prudes or degenerates. You never "quiet" them down, you only play into a libido game they play and dominate.
>>319678443
>>319678849
>>319679298
Did you want to samefag a little harder there?
>inb4 mspaint'd screenshot with (You) removed
>>319678443
>pander to an audience that was initially who it's for and make guaranteed dosh
or
>censor your own work to appease to people who have no intention of buying it in the first place and lose your initial audience all while having your game bomb
Sounds like a no brainer
>>319678056
Nah, don't do it unless they force you to. Your game will probably be really niche anyway, who the fuck will the censorship even be for?
>>319680094
i dunno i just heard about people censoring DoA bravely and other great hits and it made me worried.
