I just realized that the story is the same in all three games
>protagonist arrives in city/returns to city
>associate turns on you
>kill associate in the end
>>319641430
Damn you're right
>>319641430
>>319641430
What does OP think about the HD era of GTA?
>>319641430
Nice catch.
>>319641690
Damn fine games.
>>319641430
>Protagonist start at the first island
>Met antagonist
>Kill antagonist at the end
It's all the same shit
>>319641690
4 is shit
>White MC in III
>White MC in VC
>Black MC in SA
Checkmate, OP.
Who is the blonde on SA's cover anyway?
>>319642938
>he doesn't know
>>319642938
It's a prostitute. Noone important.
>>319643003
Yeah I don't
The only girl I remember in SA is the one who has you do shit in the outskirts of Los Santos but I don't remember what she looks like
>>319641690
GTA IV is great
Chinatown Wars is awesome
Haven't played Episodes nor V yet
>>319641430
VC taught me to never trust niggers.
Friendly reminder that anyone that likes IV or V more than VC and SA was probably born after the year 2000.
Daily reminder that anyone who prefer VC or SA over 3 are underage faggots
>>319643503
>>319643619
ITT butthurt nostalgia fag
>>319643503
Friendly reminder that people have different tastes.
VC=IV>SA=III=V>CW=VCS=LCS>2>1
>>319643619
>>319643503
The cycle of modern games on /v/ is kind of funny
GTA 4 is mostly considered good now because of all the underage fags growing up with it
In 3 years or so, Skyrim will be considered the pinnacle of TES games
>>319643774
>IV is bad meme
lovin' it
How are you just realizing this?
That's the point.
>>319641430
All the GTA games revolve around betrayal.
>>319641430
Nigga, even fucking V made fun of this fact:
>"You do some jobs for a fool, develop a little uneasy relationship. And then they ask you to do something above and beyond. You fall out, fools get capped, then you start all over again with some other fool. "
>>319643059
It's the same woman from GTA 3 who you kill in the last mission.
>>319641430
So?
>playing GTA games for the story
>>319644575
>not playing GTA games for story and overall lore
>>319642864
>italian
>white
>>319643896
IV was a weak GTA
deal with it.
>hey do you remember what you loved about GTA:SA?
>yeah, lets take that away
On the other hand it wasn't that bad, but the game was EXTREMELY overhyped, and couldn't live up to the massive hysteria caused by the fans, also everyone expected more freedom, things to do and a better game than the previous title was.
>>319644654
>playing any games for the story
Story should be nothing more than gravy when it's good.
>>319643503
I was born in 87. V was my favourite.
>>319644834
IV has insane amounts of technology, even V can't compare
IV was a gamechanger like III to GTA2 was
>>319644952
I was also born in '87 but SA is my favourite. However, I respect your opinion because I'm not a reactionary sub-20-year-old shiteater.
>>319644974
The problem was that IV had too little contents, not even the usual vehicle missions like ambulance or firetruck.
There's not even a car collecting mission.
IMO I had more fun playing CW than IV simply because it had more things to do. It's the case where quantity > quality.
Ten penny isn't an assosciate, unless you consider the grove disliking you for leaving as turning their back. Big Smoke secretly turns on you though.
>>319645303
>car collecting mission
There are two of those. Brucie one and from some other guy.
>ambulance or firetruck
IV has upgraded vigilante missions.
>>319644974
It was a gamechanger thats for sure. But for fucks sake I wanted an upgraded version of SA or at least some continue from the previosu games.
I don't want serious bullshit and realism in a GTA, especially if it actually opposes fun.
Also the problem with the new generation GTAs is that they are not memorable, and people forget about them.
Especially in Vs case, people forget about it one damn month after release.
>>319645486
>There are two of those. Brucie one and from some other guy.
I want something like 3/LCS though
>IV has upgraded vigilante missions.
Well, JUST ONE. CW had all of them.
>>319645571
That ONE is pretty big and complex though if we compare how vigilante missions were before
>>319641430
I love the technical imprevements of the following GTAs, but I prefer SA since I can basically modify everything with ease
>>319644974
IV is good but it wasn't GTA-fun until BoGT.
>>319643652
>VC=IV>SA=III=V>CW=VCS=LCS>2>1
looks like chemical component
>>319645667
So? Why not add the Taxi missions too?
I mean vehicle missions weren't a huge problem considering the people they worked with and the budget. They obviously remembered it but not added it.
And that "big and complex" mission is gone too on V.
>>319643503
Every GTA past VC is utter shit.
VC was just decent.
>>319646149
You can work for Roman and drive his taxis. It's not a standalone taxi mission though.
>>319646271
Which ends after couple times and not available anymore after the apartment got burned. It's not infinite.
>>319646072
I just had to take the ACS exam, and your post is triggering me.
RIP Guru/8-Ball
>>319646923
>my hands are all messed up, so you better drive, brother
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW
Upvoted, OP. Good catch.
>>319644491
nigga you dumb
