This is actually a really fun squad based third person shooter
Why did Xcu'ck fags have to lie to me and say it was bad?
>>319537704
I keep forgetting this game exists. I suppose that after they got completely overshadowed by what was supposed to be a consolation game to what was seen as a bunch of ignorant whiners the devs were left with more freedom to finish off. Them producing something fun doesn't seem impossible.
I remember thinking that it looked like it played distinctly like Bioshock though, and I never liked Bioshock much.
It was $60 when it came out and definitely not worth it.
I don't even remember that much about it actually. Might just give it a whirl later on just for the heck of it.
>>319537704
Is the setting fun?
I stopped playing it once i found out you don't wear your hat and outfit and instead wear some sweater
>>319538184
Yeah I got it for $3.99, that much is fair. It really needed a co-op or multiplayer mode.
>>319538253
1950's suburbs and vistas are great places for chest high walls instead of the grey ass that is Gears.
Too many niggers for my liking though.
>>319538415
This is the greatest sin the game commits
Its actually pretty fun. Find it for cheap >>319538253
Didn't you post this yesterday, exact same words and everything?
>>319538552
>Making this thread again after yesterday's thread of everyone saying it was shit
>>319538184
The gameplay was pretty boring cover based. The tweeeest was actually really good.You were playing as the ethereal possessing the MC. You make the obligatory 4 different endings choice then the ayy lmao fucks off to prepare for the invasion in the original XCOM
>>319538415
>shitting on XCOM sweaters
>>319538893
>have a hat that gets show off that you can go pick up
>replaced with a sweater and no hat
>>319537704
PRESS W TO MOVE FORWARD.
>>319538037
Plays more like Mass Effect without the free roam.
