>tfw barely anything in this game is a true combo
> combos rarely get performed on characters that aren't fastfallers.
>2-3 hits combos usually.
>people consider this a combo-heavy game.
Why is this okay?
I agree with some points
64>Melee>Brawl>Smash4
>>319317568
Are you listing the order of release or something?
>>319317473
>Thinking smash players know what combos are
There's your first problem.
>>319317473
>people worrying about combos in a party game
>>319317568
there is literally no valid argument as of why 64 is better than melee
2/10 made me reply
Fox and Falco are anamolies.
Anon it's Shitposting hour. Can't have a smash thread for another 12 hours or shitposters will make this thread home.
also having heavy combos on fast fallers makes them balanced, as they are combo heavy characters.
True combos are for PM flowchart babies.
>>319317861
Combo game is heavier, Melee has more depth though
>>319317664
Listing in order of how fun they are
>>319318906
>Listing in order of how fun they are
Oh, ok I was wondering because in that case you are wrong.
>>319318906
>Listing in order of how fun they are
So why is Brawl on the list?
How long until melee goes to /vr/?
>>319317802
Yeah bruh who cares about winning?
The problem is that Smash players call them combos when they're actually strings.
