I want to play a game with good graphics.
What should I play?
>>318781714
JC3 is great with the spec requirements.
>>318781714
Fallout 4.
>>318781858
I've been playing that too much recently though.
>>318781858
he said good graphics, consolefag.
>>318781714
Ori and the blind forest
Undertale
This one
>>318783187
This, really nice looking.
>>318784106
Also this
>>318781714
If you want graphics above everything else then Ark: Survival Evolved is your best bet.
It's definitely the most graphically impressive game available at the moment, though plagued with optimisation issues. Its gameplay leaves a lot to be desired though.
>>318784308
Thanks, but I don't play ching chong japanese games with hypersexualised female "characters" and over-complicated plots that back tracks on itself.
>>318784332
Too much jpg artifacts.
>>318784534
Uwotm8?
Even on epic settings, Ark looks about as good as Far Cry 3.
>>318784534
What? Ark looks bland as fuck. The dinos look good but that's it.
>>318781714
SW battlefront
Never played it myself, but it looks good.
>>318784308
MGSV doesn't look that good. if you position your camera right you can get some decent shots, but outside of characters and maybe lighting everything looks like average, below average if we're talking about terrain..
>>318783187
>>318784332
>>318784648
looks like shit, to be honest. it just has good effects
>>318784820
What does that even mean? If it looks good it looks good. It doesn't matter if it's using trickery or not.
>>318781714
High Fidelity or Aesthetically Pleasing?
>>318781714
Witcher 3 can look pretty good with mods.
If you are looking for a game with an excellent art style, Endless Legend is GOD tier.
Just Cause 3 also looks so fucking good.
>>318784819
>MGSV doesn't look that good
Ya it doe m8
>>318785016
Both at the same time.
>>318781714
Certainly not Crysis 3, it looks fucking ablysmal for the performance you get
>>318785016
High fidelity. Something that's aesthetically pleasing will have high fidelity, but something has has high fidelity doesn't need to be aesthetically pleasing.
>>318784819
This is the one true answer. Battlefront is miles above anything else that exists in 2015.
>>318785193
Not really.
The Witcher 3 is a way bigger culprit of draining performance for no reason.
>>318785360
Giving every object a purely white specular map does not make it the best looking game of all time.
>>318785360
It's not just that it looks good though.
For how graphically impressive it is, it runs extremely well.
The frostbite engine truly is a wonder of the universe.
>>318785465
What's it like sounding like a dumb fucking asshole? Because that's what you sound like right now.
>>318785016
both of them look kinda mad. WW HD is a really bad example of aethetics, they fucked it up a bit. use original with 4x resolution in Dolphin or games like Okami if you want to stick with 3D
>>318785104
look at this texture on the flat rock. ground texture is kinda bad, foliage is a meh. erc. It doesn't look bad, but there are already better looking games out there. It can be argued Witcher 3 looks better.
Look at the post above with Battlefront foliage
>>318785016
Both are bad examples and both suffer from the identical problem of too much bloom. The top terrain looks like snow, the bottom terrain looks like radioactive waste.
>i'm an sjw kek who likes to play rehashed content every year
The Order is one of the best looking games ever
also isn't tha bad as everyone claim it to be
surprisingly hard to find decent Battlefront pics, most of them either comparisons or pre-release with EA logo.
>>318785465
:^) Battlefront uses PBR. It doesn't have specular maps.
>>318785626
The order looks mediocre with shitty film filters thrown on top of it.
Not to mention how every screenshot is low resolution like the one you posted so it's hard to even compare it with proper video games.
>also isn't tha bad as everyone claim it to be
yes it is, it's fucking awful.
>>318785465
You can make up whatever bullshit you want, but Battlefront looks really fucking good, without being full of disgusting filters.
Shame it has no content, though.
>>318785626
my dick has more interaction than that game
>>318785626
It's pretty bad, anon. Don't lie. I really will never understand exactly what they had hoped to accomplish with this game.
>>318781714
GTAV
>>318785362
It renders the entire map you're on though compared to Crysis 3 which renders a very small map (I don't know how much it renders on that small map though). MGSV also renders the entire map, but trades quality for performance by pretty much only rendering bases when Snake is near.
>>318785360
I'm really fucking pissed they went full Destiny tier jew on that shit
The game itself is borderline masterpiece on a technical level
>>318785626
The Order looks good but a little too refined. There's barely any clutter, surfaces are very smooth/reflective and lack a layer of grime, nothing really stands out in the monochrome images, etc. It's like the second pass of a level before you put all the detail in.
>>318785708
that snow
>>318785213
>Something that's aesthetically pleasing will have high fidelity
>something has has high fidelity doesn't need to be aesthetically pleasing.
These are some fucking bizarre assumptions.
People seem to think that realistic games don't have any art direction just because they aren't heavily stylized. There isn't this binary "Realism vs Art" that people like to think there is. True realism would just be google maps or something.
The art direction in a realistic game is just more in line with that of live action films.
>>318786158
Crysis 3 renders 4k textures, the shadows of every blade of grass, as well as water, grass, and object physics.
It has every right to be demanding.
Those open world games render a small area surrounding the player in low quality compared to before the downgrades, and nothing else.
In the cities the framerate goes to shit no matter what and to this day still has horrible popin.
>>318785626
>cut off 1/3 of a 1080p screen
>GUYS LOOK HOW AMAZING OUR GAME LOOKS
Please please please don't tell me console keks didn't fall for this.
>>318785708
>game generally does a good job hiding seams between objects
>obvious mesh clipping on left hand side
>>318785519
how did dragon age end up looking on frostbite? All I remember was that the dragons looked cool.
>>318785626
Shut the fuck up.
>>318781714
Star Wars Battlefront
>>318786516
>>318786520
>>318786423
>>318785981
>>318785945
>>318785781
all these assmad pkeks
Battlefront, Well modded Skyrim. Assuming you haven't played the latter to shit already.
>>318781858
>fo4
>good graphics
Its good to keep your standards low. That way your never disappointed
>>318786158
Was that screenshot supposed to impress me?
>>318786689
This delusional console peasant. Enjoy that movie on your xbone
>>318786426
you mean snow on the laft hand side. there's also blur everythweer and gun is doubled, so it's eiter a shot from shitty youtube video or some alpha shit. Or indeed a small mesh clipping they fucked up.
Game also can handle itself at 4K on 980ti and FuryX.
It's a shame DICE is locked up at EA, they're technical wizards with no bullshit.
far cry 4
it honestly looks better in-game
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter
Incoming shitposting.
>>318781714
A movie.
Outside
>>318785104
Bro that looks like shit. MGSV was one of the worst looking games to come out this year
>Filters
>bloom
>oversaturation
>blur everything that's not in center because it looks horrible
>sometimes sharpen the fuck out of image
>add some effects that obscure the screen
>People post these games as "good looking"
half of the shit isn't even aesthetically pleasing and fail at technical side of things.
>>318785360
Very pretty. For about four hours.
Uninstalled.
>>318786407
4k textures aren't demanding though if you have enough VRAM and if the game uses that VRAM efficiently. Crysis 3 was pretty well optimized and I don't remember the texture quality having a huge effect on my performance.
The lighting and overall effects though are great and the game does have more advanced physics than the Witcher 3.
Witcher 3 pre-downgrade had the exact same textures and models though. The only differences are the lighting, the LOD, and various other effects. There's an LOD mod in the works that should fix most of the issues there and one of the main lighting mods I use is close to release with some actual improvements. The rendering hasn't changed at all from pre-release to release though.
I don't know what issues you're having with cities though, I only get like a 5 fps drop with my shadow tweaks and LOD mod.
>>318788038
>There's an LOD mod in the works that should fix most of the issues
There shouldn't need to be a fucking mod.
Those cocksuckers are sitting back claiming that they "LOVE" the modding community.
Oh they love it alright, they love how they do their work for them. Motherfuckers...
>>318787431
FC4 looks good, but last time I played it, half of the higher spec settings were broken on PC.
Weird-ass ghosting effects with HBAO, SMAA looking extremely blurry and saturating the image, TXAA being completely broken, etc.
>>318787431
Far Cry 4 looked so fucking good, but the game was completely fucked on the north end of the map. Nvidia Soft Shadows literally made the entire north part of the map flicker and that was my favorite part of the game minus the amazing effect that trees had that I forget.
>>318787506
How does that game even run? It looks pretty good in some screenshots, but the character models are Skyrim modded tier bad.
>tfw indie dev
>tfw you'll never make games that look as nice as the ones in this thread
>tfw you don't have a studio to capture PBR textures, or scan 3D objects like the Ethan Carter devs
Try Everybody's Gone To The Rapture, OP. It's a mediocre walking simulator, but it looks pretty.
>>318788385
are you a troll?
look at this image and then look at Battlefront. and then consider the fact that Battlefront runs at 60 and this game runs @30FPS with constant drops and it's not like anything is happening there.
>>318788304
Are you okay anon? You seem angry.
All the mod does is force the game to render the higher quality meshes that are already in the game. All the work is already done.
>>318788667
The point is they sit back and relax while they make others fix it for them.
They claim that they have a really good relationship with their fans, but they always lie and give little support to the modding community.
>>318788385
those handlebars look like they're on backwards
>>318788385
Ethan Carter was made by 6 people, what the fuck are you talking about. Just group up a few friends, you colossal faggot.
>>318788385
I'm pretty sure the guy who did the art for Dear Esther and Mirror's Edge did the art for that game.
Speaking of Mirror's Edge, why has nobody posted that yet?
>>318788836
It's not really a fix though, it's just forcing the game to load higher quality meshes already in the game. It lowers some performance and introduces some really weird pop-in, which is why I assume CDPR chose to modify the LOD and make it the way it is.
>>318789053
I'm almost positive he was referring to Battlefront anon. Ethan Carter devs scanned objects.
>>318789053
You don't need friends, you need a $5,000 camera.
>>318786731
>someone wasted his time to make this shitty entitled picture
>>318789093
Bullshit, they just can't fulfill their end of the bargain.
They take the easy way out. A tiny bit of pop in?
OH FUCK, JUST COVER THE ENTIRE MAP IN BLUE FOG SENPAI, I'M SURE THEY WONT NOTICE :^).
>>318789332
What's the picture entitled to?
>>318786731
>>318789332
i don't know, i thought it was funny and had some truth to it
>>318789053
I wish I had friends who are video game industry veterans and own expensive hardware
GTA V :^)
>>318789713
>>318789298
What are you fucking retards talking about. You don't need expensive hardware, nor 5000$ cameras. Where do you get such inane ideas from? You just need a normal camera, a non-shit pc and a photoscan to 3d software.
>>318789484
It's not a tiny bit of pop-in, it's more noticeable than whatever pop-in is already in the game.
The blue fog wasn't even to cover the LOD issues because the distant detail of trees and terrain isn't really bad. If you watch the Sword of Destiny trailer the LOD for distant buildings is the only thing that's been downgraded.
The blue fog wasn't added in to cover anything up though, it was apparently an artistic choice. I think it was to add to the somewhat painterly art style, but I'm not sure as only the quest designer talked about it.
>>318784560
Back to reddit with ye.
>>318791052
but reddit loves mgs you fag
>>318790930
Then they fix it.
They're the ones with the fucking SDK that they refuse to make a modkit out of.
If you had a beautiful painting, but noticed that the trees in the background didn't look the best, would you fucking slather blue paint across the entire canvass?
