![maxresdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/7SWay3y.jpg "maxresdefault[1].jpg")
NVIDIA GTX 970 or AMD R9 390?
https://strawpoll.me/6146426
https://strawpoll.me/6146426
https://strawpoll.me/6146426
>>318443710
Just get a 980
>>318443804
>£250 budget
>get a 980!
>>318443854
Where the fuck did you state you were on a budget?
>3.5
>>318443854
Then save your money you fucking retard.
390 you idiot.
>same price
>better performance
>has advertised specs
>you won't be supporting jews
>>318443921
>X or Y
>Z!
do you really need a gpu?
might be better to wait until the die-shrink
>>318443962
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdwUsalwBJ8
>>318443804
>>318443854
get a 980 from ebay. they are going for like 350 on average. about 50 smacks more than a "on sale" 970.
>>318444098
That shit's not happening until Q2 2016 at the earliest.
We're about 7 months away from new cards.
>>318444080
You didn't state you exclusively want just x or y either.
Besides Z is objectively better
>>318444172
does op really need to upgrade though
960 and coast until new cards come out
>>318444268
that's just silly
>>318443710
980 or don't bother
>>318444223
If he has a shit GPU currently, yes.
If you're not willing to wait, at the earliest, 7 months for the latest GPUs then you're probably someone who only upgrades every 4/5 years anyway and don't give a shit.
970 is the only correct answer.
>that huge overclocking overhead potential
>those temps
>that driver support
>implying any game used more than 3.5GB memory, even with 4k textures
>all these corporate whores ITT recommending a 980
lel
>>318444663
>implying the 3.5gb doesn't gimp the entire card
>Buying a 3.5GB meme card that will shit itself at 1440p/4k
LMAO
>>318444790
fucking ROFL
please tell me this is b8 / photoshop
>>318444790
Post 1440p/4k so 970fucks can REALLY feel their 3.5GB buyers remorse.
>>318444790
>20-30 fps at 1920x1080 on the G1 which has a crazy out-of-the-box OC
Why are you posting bullshit?
>>318444898
Of course it's photoshop.
>>318444790
>THE 960 IS BETTER THAN THE 970
NVIDIA SHILLS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>318444952
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9cKZiJw6Pk&feature=youtu.be
>>318444952
>lel 780ti and 970 as fast as a 280x
>>318443710
I got a 390 for my new build. Did some research, runs almost all games better than the 970 except for fallout and witcher 3, but im fine with that.
>>318445010
>>318444898
>>318445042
970 goes to shit when it goes past 3.5gb of vram usage
This has been known fact since the card came out.
We get it, all you play is tf2, hearthstone, and facebook shit, it doesn't change the fact the 970 is crap for any game that actually needs a proper gpu, fuck off.
>>318445301
1080p for comparison.
>>318444790
man that must've taken a long time to shoop, went way overboard though, nobody is gonna take this b8
>>318445393
I play 1080p@60fps so the 970 is perfect for me.
>>318445393
/v/ denied, frametimes died.
>>318445393
>970 goes to shit when it goes past 3.5gb of vram usage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lkh3L6PS2lw
>>318445393
>970 goes to shit when it goes past 3.5gb of vram usage
>that's why a 2gb card is better :^)
>>318445536
Literally that's the only picture that is posted
AMDrones must cling to it
>>318444371
Why? You're either paying 170~ for something you'll replace in a few years or 340~ for something that's fucked out of the box. The 970 has 50% better performance than the 960 for double the price.
Neither will have good DX12 support and the new cards are literally months away. The 960 will play anything out right now and do it well for half the price of the 970.
Absolutely not worth it unless you have more money than you know what to do with, in which case this argument is null because you're already running a titan.
>>318445603
It is better, because it'll unload textures as needed, instead of simply hitting 3.5gb, thinking it can keep going, and break down like your mom after realizing you'll never amount to shit.
>>318445705
>Downsampling from 4K to increase memory usage
>muh frame drops
Fucking idiots
Either some Nvidiot with a VPN spammed the poll or /v/ is genuinely retarded.
970 can't even do proper DX12, it has have specific software rigged to do things that should be hardware oriented like the R9 series has.
>>318443710
Unless you're a richfag with money to burn for no good reason, the 390
>all these shills lying on the internet
jesus christ, sure is viral in here today
>>318443710
Whichever you can get the cheapest.
Both are far from perfect and actually not worth more than ~290€.
Luckily I got my GTX 3.5 for 270€.
It's just a temporary thing until the truly new cards arrive next year. My HD 7870 just didn't quite do it anymore.
AMDead Rebrandeon Housefire shills have arrived.
Have fun with your 'drivers' that melt your already overheating cards.
>>318445912
>Maxwell 2: Queues in Software, work distributor in software (context switching), Asynchronous Warps in hardware, DMA Engines in hardware, CUDA cores in hardware.
>GCN: Queues/Work distributor/Asynchronous Compute engines (ACEs/Graphic Command Processor) in hardware, Copy (DMA Engines) in hardware, CUs in hardware.”
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-will-fully-implement-async-compute-via-driver-support.html
>>318443710
960ti
It will be 200 dollaroos.
>>318446069
They learned from Nvidia :^)
Oh I forgot, you're too young to remember Fermi
>>318446069
Nvidia has done it twice!
http://modcrash.com/nvidia-display-driver-damaging-gpus/
http://www.zdnet.com/article/warning-nvidia-196-75-drivers-can-kill-your-graphics-card/
http://gadgets.ndtv.com/laptops/news/windows-10-is-killing-nvidia-graphics-cards-720443
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/862417/geforce-drivers/windows-10-geforce-drivers-are-killing-samsung-and-lg-notebook-lcd-display-panels/
>>318446104
Nvidia themselves flat tell devs not to do lots of context switching as maxwell (and probably kepler too) is fucking disastrous at it. GCN doesn't give a fuck. DX12 is setup to be very parallel.
http://wccftech.com/preemption-context-switching-allegedly-best-amd-pretty-good-intel-catastrophic-nvidia/
>>318446209
>m-muh one card from 5 years ran hot
>this excuses current (and all) AMD cards from literally dying because of bad drivers!
Will my 660 be enough for DkS3
That's all I want from it
>>318446291
>unironically posting WCCFtech
>expecting to be taken seriously
>>318446127
This.
>>318443710
Thanks, OP.
>>318446435
You should see where they are getting the info from, its not from their backside either.
>>318444663
>>implying any game used more than 3.5GB memory,
You clearly have never played GTA V on highest settings even at 1080p.
>>318446291
>it's fine when AMD does it!!!1!
>>318446474
That's what I have, it's a great card
AMD builds always have a fuckmillion problems and compatibility issues when trying to run games
Nvidia wins by default
>>318446537
GTA V maxed will bring every card to it's knees dumbass
>>318446537
Thanks, OP.
>>318443854
PC master race isn't for poorfags.
>>318446729
This picture has been disproven so many times
I did this at the same settings on my card and it didn't drop
>>318443710Pascal
>>318446552
Upgrading from a 560ti. Was really starting to feel the strain, what a great card it was for the time.
>>318445536
>980 and 290x
Why not compare the 970 to it's only direct competetor, the 290/390?
>>318446663
You/he said a faulty thing and I answered.
>>318446729
Yeah, I try to keep my 970 at 3,2GB VRAM used (checking via Afterburner every now and then), just to be sure.
>>318446897Arctic Islands
>>318446729
>my gtx 750ti with 2gb vram can max the game at 1920x1080
are amd shills this desperate?
>>318446962Go home Reddie
The 390 is better, but you really shouldn't consult /v/ on this. A lot of people don't really know what's actually going on with the 970 and just mindlessly regurgitate half truths they hear in meme images without doing any actual independent research.
>>318445393
>>318445761
Like this retard. It wasn't a known issue at the start and that's not how it handles vram allocation. Nobody knew there was anything wrong for like 3 months.
>>318446783
Damn son whered ya find this?
>>318443710
R9 390.
Why is this so hard? Its cheaper and benchmarks show it's faster too.
>>318447027
>>my gtx 750ti with 2gb vram can max the game at 1920x1080
No it can't.
Even at low to medium settings it hits the 2GB VRAM ceiling pretty fast.
970 owner here. Had a HD 7870 2GB before.
>>318447027
Ikr? I can play GTA V on ultra settings on a GeForce 210
They are desperate at this point
>>318447054
>Nobody knew there was anything wrong for like 3 months.
That is because the driver actively works to prevent it. Problem is due to how Nvidia cut down the 980 to make the 970 the last partition is in a XOR situation - reading or writing to it tanks bandwidth of the entire card.
See the bigger picture as well, the second Nvidia ditches driver optimisations for it (lel kepler) they won't be writing game specific code to prevent said tanking happening, should a game merely demand moar vram with little regard in how it gets it.
>>318446729
Everyone knows the GTAV vram bar is completely innaccurate. I manged to run the game on my 1GB GTX 560ti on very high settings using a supposed "2GB" of vram in 1080p@60fps. That's why it was the perfect game to photoshop this bait with.
>>318447127
black friday deal or some shit at scan.co.uk
but i expected it today and it still hasnt been despatched :/
>Nvidia releases TWO separate driver updates which destroy GPUs by disabling fan control
>Nobody remembers a thing
>AMD releases a beta driver that does the same thing
>Suddenly it's the biggest scandal everyone's ever seen
>>318447580
Nvidia had to get people to upgrade to Kepler somehow
Just get a used 290x on ebay.
Just cut my fps in half please.
R9 390 is slightly cheaper but slightly more powerful.
>>318447889
Not in my country broh
>>318447754
If the 3,5GB debacle showed us anything, it's that average FPS is not as important.
Frametimes and min. FPS are equally important.
>>318447307
And once Nvidia starts to gimp Maxwell cards to get people to upgrade to Pascal people are really going to get but hurt
The 970 only does well because the drivers are optimized for it, and once Nvidia stops optimizing them in a couple of months the cards will be unusable
>>318446946
>560ti
I feel like every time one of these is replaced, it should be put into a memorial graveyard. The thing is such a trooper.
;_;7
Posted this in the last thread but. I picked up a GTX 960 on Black Friday, but I'm worried about the 2GB VRAM will hold me back soon. Probably gonna return it and spend the extra $100 for a radeon 390. Is this good idea y/n
>>318448140
You have a moral obligation to support AMD since Nvidia are anti competitive jews that are actively destroying the industry
Quick question: Can my 600W power supply handle an upgrade from a R9 390 to a 390X?
>>318448029
Nvidia doesn't "gimp" older cards. They introduce better cards that do certain things better, which allow developers to do new effects which don't run as well on older cards.
A 780 is just as good today as it was on release, but its poor performance with tessellation is a bigger deal today because developers have begun to make heavy use of it with things like Hairworks.
Anyone fighting against better graphics that utilize better hardware is no better than a fucking console player.
>>318447381
can you buy that with burger money, or do they only deliver to yuros?
>>318448140
A 390 is one hell of a leap from a 960 - a 4gb 380 is a fine alternative.
>>318448268
Sure bub
Is that why the 290x is getting better and better over time while the 770/780 is getting beat by mid range AMD cards now?
you'd have to be from reddit to actually buy a gtx 970 at this point. willfully throwing your money away.
>>318448287
only yuros or pounds
even if they could i wouldnt recommend them on their shipping
>>318446946
>>318448110
>560 ti
I must of had a bad card, my experience with the thing was terrible due to it not liking any of the drivers except maybe two
970 might be preferable if not for games coming out with hungry hungry memory usage.
>>318448268
>Nvidia doesn't "gimp" older cards. They introduce better cards that do certain things better, which allow developers to do new effects which don't run as well on older cards.
So basically what you meant to say was yes they do.
>>318448251
Power draw between the two cards is virtually nonexistant.
>>318448268
The 780ti was faster than a 290x across the board when it launched, now it loses to a 290x nearly every time.
>>318448251
Maybe
Is is a cheap Chinese POS?
>>318448498
Progress=/=gimping
You don't expect a 480 to sill max modern games do you?
>>318448587
I have a EVGA 600B 600W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX
>mfw Sapphire R9 390 currently en route
Is there a relatively safe place to buy used cards besides ebay?
>>318448519
>>318448463
The 780 gets the same performance today as it did on release. AMD improving their drivers is indicative of their own success, not proof of Nvidia's failings.
>>318448498
How is making better cards year after year a bad thing? Would you prefer they just stop innovating so people only have to buy a card once and it lasts for 7 years? Just go buy a PS4 if you're fine not being able to make use of modern graphic technology.
Which 390 should I get?
I'm think about powercolor because they made my 6850 and it has been good to me
>>318448717
It should handle it, but with not very much overclocking headroom
>>318448684
>"""""""progress"""""""""""""""
>nvidia works godrays that barely look better than the ones the developer made and yet they completely annihilate your fps
If the 970 and 390 turned into girls - which one would u fug?
I bought a 950
>>318448905
the 390 would have sexier feet, so i'd pick her.
>>318448905
the 390 because she costs less and bangs better
>>318448901
Did I talk about gameworks? No? So why did you bring it up?
>>318448905
Crimson 390 because she's hotter
>>318448818
>The 780 gets the same performance today as it did on release. AMD improving their drivers is indicative of their own success, not proof of Nvidia's failings.
Right, but if Nvidia are so superior for drivers what has stopped them squeezing more performance from the 780? GCN is just as old as kepler.
>>318447369
The point is that high VRAM is very real in games now, even at 1080p.
>>318448958
>>318448818
>midrange cards from the same time of release as the 780 are now beating it in games
>sill the same performance
Are Nvidiots really this much in denial?
>>318448827
As a rule hawaii based cards are tiered by coolers, so its generally accepted to be sapphire > msi > all other chumps. The Powercolor PCS+ 390 is a damn fine card though due to the beefy cooler.
>>318443710
Unless you want your GPU maker to literally force you to upgrade ever year I suggest the 390
>>318448905
970 because it understands 3.5
>fell for the Nvidia meme
>have to upgrade every year thanks to new drivers crippling performance
>my 780ti which stomped the 290X at release now gets absolutly destroyed by it, even fucked by the two year old low end 290 non X
IT'S NOT FUCKING FAIR
THIS ISN'T THE WAS IT'S MEANT TO BE PLAYED
Is there really a need to upgrade each generation, or do you wait a few years?
I think a big problem with Nvidia's tech like Hairworks and God Rays is that it isn't immediately apparent what's being done in screenshots, so you have people like >>318448901 who don't understand what they do and can't tell anything's different from screenshots
The performance cost of those features is directly related to the quality of the effect. Think of each god ray or strand of hair as a straight line. Increasing tessellation splits that line into more segments, increasing the quality of the effect when the lines move or are otherwise interacted with. Increasing tessellation in hairworks creates smoother hair, and increasing tessellation in god rays creates sharper, more well defined rays that look really neat as you round a corner and they appear.
But you could never tell that that's happening from a static screenshot, so you get a lot of misinformation from uninformed users who spout nonsense about how nothing changes when you increase the settings.
Can a high grade 750watt PSU handle crossfire 390s?
Seasonic and 80+gold, fully modular.
>>318449360
With Nvidia there is
Kepler now gets 30fps in modern games
>>318449360
For Nvidia users, usually yes.
AMD not so much. It's why they have trouble selling cards - if your two year old shit still competes with Maxwell and even beats it, there is literally no reason to upgrade.
It's what AMD gets for being not going all jew.
>>318449415
No, you'll need around 1000W
>>318449360
If you want to stay bleeding edge? An upgrade a year keeps the goyim in fear. My personal rule is only upgrade when a single card offers double performance of your current one, which typically translates to a 2-3 year cycle.
>>318449415
You'd have to do your research as the 295x2 (2x290x) will pull 500w on its own and thats factoring in watercooling on the cores (and lower temps = lower power draw).
>>318446663
Only Ultra grass really does that to every card.
>>318449230
>/r/pcmasterrace
>>318449360
With AMD you're actually punished for upgrading frequently because it takes them 3~4 years to get drivers that make effective use of their hardware.
>>318444075
Games run like shit cause nvidia owns the biz.
Lol, if you cant beat em, join em.
Rebel scum.
Why the fuck would i buy 390 when i fucking know everything is optimised for nvidia.. Deal with it. Your like that shitty hipster fan boy who tricked me into getting an amd card 5 yrs ago. Thank god i have nvidia now.
>>318449584
>and lower temps = lower power draw
Not necessarily
You can have low temps with high power draw if you have a cooler powerful enough to dissipate the heat
>>318444201
Yes and a 390x is objectively better than that.
>>318449768
Well yeah but for simplicity sake it is a good rule of thumb.
>>318449289
This guy knows what's up and yet people ignored him. During that time, the HD 5xxx series just entered Legacy.
>>318446069
>AMDfags
>uses facts about AMD and the lies Nvidia spouts
>Nvidiafags
>Uses memes and runs away from any evidence that other cards ate performing better for less money
>>318444790
>960 is better than 970
Lel
>>318449403
There's like, two fucking enemies in Witcher 3 that actually benefit much from the extra tessellation. The reality is that the developers made a pretty good hair mesh, or god rays, or whatever and optimized them pretty well, whereas most of Nvidia's settings are just superlative and shit on framerates for minimal gain. The only "Nvidia-specific" settiing I've ever enabled in their soft shadows in GTAV, and that one ran perfectly well on AMD too.
I've been trying to decide if I want a 290X or a 390. From what I've read, there's only a little bit of a difference performance wise. Should I just go with the 290X?
>>318446069
Memes.
>>318446209
>>318446291
Facts and sources.
Its incredible. It's this way for every single AMD vs Nvidia thread.
>>318450375
A good 390 > a shit 290x. So it depend on which versions of each card you are considering.
>>318450375
I don't think the 290x is in production so it might be hard to find a new one that isn't overpriced.
>>318450541
>subpixel tessellation
Yeah, no thanks.
>>318448287
Protip because you're a fucking idiot
£1 != $1
>>318451294
please tell me this is bait
>>318451294
More retarded than all the nvidiots in this entire thread.
>>318451294
10/10
>>318450459
Can barely see the difference without straining my eyes.
Or cause I'm on mobile.
This card does me some wonders but it won't max everything at 60fps.
Should I save for a 980 or hold out a bit longer for something new down the line?
The 970 is the optimal card for beginners into the high end market.
It's the AK47 of cards.
I can handle anything for the forseeable future in 1080p. It isn't perfect, but it gets the job done and you'll leave any X1/PS4 user in the dust.
If you want to go even harder, skip the 390 and go to the next tier up.
>>318452105
i think the next set of cards from nvidia and amd are coming out mid 2016 so might as well wait
>>318452321
>It can handle anything for the forseeable future in 1080p
Until Nvidia stops optimizing drivers for it, rendering it unusable
>>318452105
wait for new cards
>>318450459
Probably MSI or Sapphire. Just went to new egg on mobile and R9 290X turned up 0 results, so 390 it is I guess.
>>318449743
>optimised for nvidia
problem with this is it only lasts as long as the current generation of cards. The moment they launch the 1000 series they couldn't care less about you.
>>318449743
even if everything is optimised for nvidia it still runs better on the 390. So you're just keking your own performance lad.
>>318448140
>>318448334
>suggesting him to go from a 960 to a 380
No, this is hella retarded. You'll gain what, 4 fps or less (as seen in the image)? Yes, going for a 390 is a good idea, as his pic show a pretty big leap.
>>318453921
>pretty big leap.
Equally in price and power draw which have to be considered if one went for a 960.
>>318449010
Does this semen demon do porn?
>>318454874
she posts lots of pics of herself and sells panties but im only interested in her feet pics b/c they're so sexy. you can find her on reddit.
>>318449415
Yes, provided you don't also power a full set of HDDs and an overclocked 2011-3 processor.
Honestly I dislike AMD GPU's a lot, but Nvidia intentionally gimped the 970 to sell the 980ti. Nvidia does not respect you as a customer and you are better off purchasing AMD graphics cards. While you may not get the drivers immediately, they are better for price vs. performance compared to nvidia after both cards have drivers for whatever game you are playing.
>>318449230
>AMD fags visit and reddit and /r/pcmasterrace
don't even remotely surprised
>>318450440
Welcome to the mind of the average nvidiot
>>318452321
>The card that lied and is objectively slower than a 390 for the same price
How.
>>318456852
>F-Facts go away when I cry reddit right?
>>318458572
you can have all the facts you want but you don't have to post the shit you find on your epic subreddit, new friend
>>318446069
(You)
>Just Cause 3 has massive issues with amd cards
kek
AMD does it again. I guess the crimson debacle was a way to at least let you have your fires and explosions.
>>318459648
Game is also having small issues with Nvidia cards but supposedly the drivers coming out tomorrow will fix it, I don't think they knew the game would be releasing this early.
>>318448489
After driver 314.22, the drivers started shitting the bed and just messed everything up. The latest Fallout 4 ready drivers worked with my 560 ti and I'm getting 45-60 fps on medium settings with it. Not upgrading until pascal, the 560ti is a beast.
>>318453470
and the amd never works? Whats your point
>>318449010
Name?
>>318461402
That's not true though.
>>318461628
Wut
>>318462550
her reddit username is in the top leftside of the webm i pointed to.
WHERE. IS. MY 390 UPS?! YOU SAID IT'D BE DELIVERED TODAY. IT'S TWO HOURS UNTIL NOT TODAY.
WHY DO THESE FUCKS LIE.
>>318443710
Between the 390 and the 970 there is not choice, the 390 is better by far. In that price range 390 is better. A more fair comparison would be with the 980 or 980ti. If you have the buck i would go for the ti.
Also have in mind that nvidia 900 series are going to be gimped by pascal. so maybe go amd.
>>318446842
Pc master race is more than AAA games. I would mastarrace refers to everything that isnt AAA or graphics. New kids go for graphics.
>>318446946
>>318448110
The 8800 gtx was my 560 ti.
>>318461589
So, when does it work well.
>>318448251
two cards are the same, just OC your 390. not worth the change.
>>318448268
>x64 tessalation on hair with virtualy NO diference betwen x4 tessalation.
>No gimp
Sure brah
>>318449010
Yep thats a dude.
>>318464841
Don't forget the underwater out of view tessellation in Crysis 2
45% of the poll
20% of the marketshare
Nvidia memers out in force
>>318465034
?
are you that gay that you can't identify a woman? do i need to show you her vagina?http://i.imgur.com/cuSY5P5.jpg
>People still defending and supporting AMD even after the current botched drivers literally breaking AMD video cards
Why do people do this to themselves?
>>318465034
No man has feet like that lad.
t. footfag professional
>>318465674
are you forgetting that nvidia had botched drivers at one point also?
>>318465674
by this logic why would anyone even think about owning an Nvidia card after the half dozen times drivers literally cooked or bricked cards with WQHL releases.
heart to heart, just admit it. youre memeing.
>>318444121
New or used?
Still, getting a gpu from ebay is not a good idea and getting a used one is retarded
I know, cause I got one and it suffers from artifacts in certain games.
>>318443710
You're a faggot shitposter trolling /v/ when this thread has been posted 3x a day on boards where people know what they're talking about
390 is objectively better unless we're talking CUDA cores
But again this board doesn't care about use besides vidya
Curious anon here.
My computer (which is about 5 years old) has a GeForce 9400 GT, which has like 512 mb RAM. I've been thinking about upgrading to another Nvidia product, but the r9 Radeon seems to do the job as well.
I just got GTA V, and I'm not doing too well. About 9-15 fps, and ocasionally I'll just hit 1-2 for about three minutes or so.
Basically, should I get the 390?
>>318443854
I got my GTX 980 for $250 USD. Try harder faggot.
>>318466408
Depends on the other components, what are your specs.
>>318466408
Post speccy and post your psu
>>318466542
>used hardware
enjoy having boogers and semen in your gpu
>>318466542
What case?
>>318466408
Troll.
Upgrade RAM.
What is your CPU?
>>318466725
>Everyone already anoints their newly built PCs in blood from an inevitable cut while assembling
>Not going the extra mile keeping your GPU appeased with your seed
>>318466770
>>318466614
>>318466563
Fucking captcha.
>>318467015
T O A S T E R
O
A
S
T
E
R
>>318467015
It's time for a full system upgrade anon
And replace that failing hard drive
>800x600
I'm so sorry
>>318467015
whats it like knowing a smartpone is more powerful than your pc.
>>318467015
This is you
>>318467015
Fuck
>>318467157
>>318467201
>>318467313
>>318467269
It's five years old.
>>318467015
Yes you need to fully upgrade. Your other choice is to just get a 750 ti to maybe play at 30 fps, some games.
>>318449837
Nvidia is a shit company, but their cards are better. Plus, more games incorporate Nvidia Gameworks than whatever AMD's got.
>>318467497
or just get a ps4.
>>318467484
It was old and underpowered when you got it
>970 winning
Going to kill myself.
3.5 gigabytes is more cinematic
>>318466725
Previous owner was a reviewer and it still had 12 months warranty.
>>318466738
SilverStone Raven RVZ01B mini-ITX. It's a bitch to build and maintain. Wouldn't recommend it for beginners.
390
>cheaper
>faster
>8gb of memory
>proper dx12 support
>freesync
>>318467850
>no shadowplay
:(
>>318450459
>>318451714
On a 3000x2000 display, I can't see a difference between x16 and x64. High tessellation is a gimmick imposed by Nvidia to make their tessellation-optimized Maxwell cards seem more powerful even to the point of gimping their one-gen old Kepler cards (yeah, I mad). Fuck Gameworks.
>>318467583
Are you really implying the nvidias bullshit "hair works" or "god rays" are better than mantle
>>318443710
wahts the diff between 290 and 390
>>318467931
>what is AMD gaming evolved
>>318468289
The 390 is refreshed 290, better cooling, more speed, more vram, etc. Its better on and all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9cKZiJw6Pk
