Is a game

>>318092112
you tear stuff away.

Dunno. I just bought it for $20 today. I'll see what it's like when it gets here.

better on vita

>>318092513
No it isn't.

>>318092653
i'm sorry that you didn't get to experience tearaway as it was meant to be instead of as a thing that sony was trying to salvage.

Man, I just can't see why this game is praised. It doesn't do anything cool, it wasn't fun at all, the platforming is slow and braindead, combat is boring as hell, the only reason I can think of for it getting a higher rating than a 6 or 7 is it's artstyle, which is dull IMO.

I'm not saying it's shit or anything but it's so middling and unimpressive and pales in the face of basically any other platformer, so why is it touted as a must have exclusive? The vitas not lacking for games (incoming meme arrows) so why is this always shoveled in on vita lists and shit? It just makes it look like those lists are grasping for straws that it doesn't need to

>>318093019
I played both, it was way better on PS4. I don't give a shit about touching the Vita.

>>318093107
It's called you have shit taste.

>>318093332
sure you did

>>318093435
3D platformers are fun and all, but if you think Tearaway is good for anything other than looks, then you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

>>318093491
Why would I lie about it? Was touching the Vita that important to you?

>>318093561
You're delusional.

>>318093837
You're the delusional one if you're praising a shallow excuse for a platformer like Tearaway. Really it was boring on both systems. I simply preferred it on the Vita because I love the comfort of playing a 3D platformer in my bed.

>>318093225
I dont believe you.