Alright, fess up. Which one of you faggots DDoS'd NeoFAG?
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
sleep tight porker
>>317347963
No sane man would waste his time DDOSing a site that has doomed itself.
based
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317348203
based faget
It was me, I did it because they wouldn't allow me to set my username as NIGGERFAGGOTS
>>317348203
>NeoFAG admin making a totally not butthurt post about his fag logo vs. a logo about something actually related to video games
>>317347963
I'd start any investigation by looking at their mods.
>>317348343
As if we needed anymore confirmation that there are shills from the SJW website here.
How 'bout that DriveClub, eh?
>>317348392
I'd start a child endangerment investigation by looking at their mods. This Kotaku shit may have finally pissed off the wrong set of assholes.
Hopefully it stays down.
>scum
Tyler Malka is currently in negotiations to sell NeoGAF to Gawker.
>>317347963
It's just Sony's servers going down again.
>>317347963
Why would you even know that garbage was being ddosed? Go away faggot
>>317348450
This is actually pretty funny.
I thought on neogaf everything is deleted if it's not a developer cock sucking / SJW thread
>>317348203
He's right in that he can do whatever the fuck he wants with his website, it's just that he and said website are pure cancer to the gaming industry.
>>317347963
feel free to leave anytime, neofaggot.
it was ebaumsworld
Damn, was trying to post there as well.
Oh well, /v/ it is.
>>317348587
A year later he'll sell it to Li Yanhong.
>>317348516
They actually did it and banned Tom? I don't know why that great and reasonable guy put up with that filth for so long.
>>317347963
>le 4chan is a one-man hacker team who attacks peepole at randumb meme
Why would you give even half a fuck about a shithole worse than Youtube comments?
>>317348698
You assume he is in charge. He's not. His SJW nigger mod who happens to be a Sony employee is running the show. A corrupt nigger who bans people for talking shit about Anita and black people.
>>317348825
Which mod? They're all pieces of shit.
>>317348825
Bish
>>317348587
the fuck would gawker do with a forum?
>>317348972
Bish. He's the one who fucked up NeoFag. He only makes other SJWs mods and he kicked mods who aren't. Tyler is a retard. He's just happy he can be friends with niggers and faggots.
hue
>post a perfectly normal picture of a woman
>MUH SOGGY KNEES
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317349021
good god, fix your font, man...
>>317349110
That's not real.
>>317349021
Yeah, that marketing deal with Angry Joe was odd.
>>317349165
sure it is
thread title is right there
last post iirc
look it up when it's back up
>>317348825
>>317349081
>Bish gets upset people still make fun of him for Turok
>Never mind the fact he walked out on his wife and child over Turok of all games
Maximum kek
Also guess who he set up a company with in 2008?
>>317349165
Most of these screencaps aren't.
>>317348626
I knew they were shill but I didn't know it was THAT bad.
>>317349110
That legit? It might be the first meaningful post I read from that asshole.
>>317349165
Yeah it is. Search for the text.
>>317349287
sure is
capped it myself
>>317349261
Yes they are. That's what make NeoGAF so hilarious. You can;t this shit up.
NeoGAF hate thread?
>>317349165
>>317349261
>>317349287
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=170682037&postcount=217
>>317349261
NeoFAG lurker here. Almost all the posts you see, despite being completely and utterly insane, are legitimate.
Look at their off-topic section. Just a week after Paris attacks and they're already back being Islamic bitches whining about muh discrimination. NeoFaggers should be put to rest.
>>317348203
>not vidya thing happens
>change the logo for your vidya forum
>vidya thing happens
>don't change the logo for your vidya forum
Thank god no one takes that shitpile seriously anymore.
>>317349407
Doesn't seem to be down to me.
>>317349110
>>317349524
just came back up
which is why I linked it
>>317349524
you just can't kill it
Can someone confirm to me if they really banned Tom from XSEED? Link to the thread where it happened?
>>317349519
He didn't change it because he's a bitch to his SJW nigger mod who is a Sony employee. EviLore has lost control of NeoFag.
>>317348626
>I feel like an 8/10 is less than what Uncharted 3 deserves [...] I, obviously, haven't had a chance to play Uncharted 3 yet [...] I think Uncharted 3 deserves more than an 8
>>317349165
It is. Suprisingly malka besides being a huge asshoel is nto a SJW.
The reason he tolerates SJW is because without them neogaf is even more of a dead place. No one cares about them anymore, devs hate them, every other gaming forum laugh at them. It's now a SJW group therapy and Malka knows that.
Which proves how much beta that faggot is.
>>317349524
It was down for about ten seconds, then the Voat crew came here because for those whole ten seconds their lives had no meaning.
>/v/ hates neofag
>thread everyday about the place
For fuck's sake.
>>317348626
Is everybody on that site a shill?
>>317349665
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=184871270&postcount=1232
hard to tell which of his posts got him done in
>>317349665
https://archive.is/Rcd5o#selection-4031.0-4031.7
>>317349519
And it's all their own doing, which makes it even better. They ban anyone with an incorrect opinion and this caused a bunch of people to wise up and keep their mouth shut which makes it even more of a hugbox for SJW faggots.
Enjoy their latest Chris-Chan thead,
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1143257
Let the rage flow.
>>317349665
Yes it happened, he provided justification for his stance but just didn't have the right opinion and got axed.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317349813
This was his last post before he was banned
>>317349761
They just keep outdoing their own stupidity which makes it hard to stay away.
>>317349665
He really did get banned. It wasn't a single individual post, it was caused by a constant and steady refusal to disagree with the hivemind.
>>317349813
There were people in that thread calling other posters pedophiles for liking anime. They never got banned. That site is cancer. Look how hard they shit on anything from Japan. Fuck them.
>>317347963
Why is there a conspiracy that there are NeoGAF members lurking /v/ all the time?
There probably aren't that many, this is once again a meme the tards on /v/ ended up believing.
>>317349920
And the justification for it
>>317349965
NeoFaggot spotted, that was easy
>>317349951
Japan treats women like shit.
They deserve to be on blast for their attitudes.
>>317349937
agree*, not disagree obviously
>>317347963
Hilarious news.
But still, who gives a fuck about neoFAGs?
That place hasn't been relevant since 2006.
>>317350006
Japan treats everyone like shit. That's the appeal.
>>317349965
Because it's not a conspiracy, they openly talk about it both on here and on their own forum.
Of course you don't believe it because you're a retarded memer in denial.
>>317350006
t. neofag that gets all of his info about japan from seasonal anime
>>317348203
yeah because faggots buttfucking each other legally is related to vidya games, isn't it?
these people are really touched in the head
>>317349982
Nevermind the fact that these "children" are pixels on a screen.
>>317348216
Even Cliffy hates neofags.
Based.
>>317349665
They did, also a mod recently practically indirectly told Brittany/Hatsuu to "align" with the hivemind or else... while addressing another poster asking why Tom got banned.
https://archive.is/7yhG5
>>317349056
Ban everyone who dissented with the site opinion. So they might as well keep him in charge, then.
>>317350102
And you believe those posts? They might as well be shitposters posting names they found when they were googeled GAF.
>>317349965
There are 100% definitely crossposters. They can't have an opinion that is at odds with the hivemind so they come here to show their true colors.
>>317349965
Not only there are members in both sites.
Some come here specifically to "raid" following orders from mods
>>317349761
First nineogag thread i've seen in a month
>>317350192
>YOU CAN'T BELIEVE THOSE POSTS MUH FALSE FLAG
You're in denial
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350192
People on NeoGAF talk about 4chan like they do in fact go here, save for some idiots who believe we blew up a van. They even tried to have a thread for 4chan's 12th birthday but it got locked because some robot BTFO some normies that same day.
I don't understand why so many SJW's like Sony.
They seem far more compatible with Nintendo right now.
>>317349081
Tyler Malka, the owner of neofags, is entirely to blame.
He's a shill
He takes payouts from publishers to shill their products
He controls an army of sock puppet accounts
He's always been a shill, on the take from a certain company
He profits from shitting up the industry with console wars bullshit.
He doesn't even play video games.
He's also a creep.
>>317350243
You can see how everyone hates each other on NeoGaf by reading their passive-aggressive posts. They think they're progressive while in truth they're just bigoted and sheltered.
>>317350134
Are you retarded? This doesn't change the fact you want to see some 10 year old girl titties. So if a game give you the option of raping a baby, this is not a problem since it's just pixels, right?
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317349982
>banned for having controversial opinions
These are the people who call themselves liberals. They're just as bad as old conservatives and Tom fucking told them in his last post.
>>317350430
>>317350405
He looks like some disgusting mixture of a Doctor Who character and an elf.
>>317349965
Gee, you don't think that there are people who visit both websites, do you? Wow! What a shocking revelation!
Take yourself for example. Get out NeoFAG.
>>317350405
He also sexually assaulted a female forum member and banned her when she called him out.
>>317349937
It really is bizarre looking at issues discussed on neogaf that are discussed elsewhere on the web. There's often very little disagreement; a single opinion repeated and rephrased many times. I suppose that's the consequence of allowing mods to censor opinion and having a 'venerated' inner circle members culture.
>>317350430
There's a huge difference between uguu moeblobs and real children. Real children are disgusting.
>>317349982
What a fucking idiot. Their own moderators are actual pedophiles and they ban some guy defending a videogame.
>>317350536
I've met him in person. I've been covering the E3 Expo since 1999. About two years ago I ran into him at the show. He was wearing a neogaf T-shirt. I didn't actually know who he was, although I had heard of the website.
When I didn't recognize him and immediately kiss his ass he gave me the most hateful, evil scowl.
The next year he was rejected for E3 admission.
True story.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350430
Well no, it's not. It's pixels, they don't exist.
>>317350573
I heard about that. I wish more people knew that story. Especially the SJWs they love to champion.
I honestly think that's the real reason for all the SJW crusading on that forum. They're trying to cover for the fact that the site owner is a well known perv creep.
>>317350583
>>317350650
Classic pedo defence.
>Are you implying my massive collection of pictures featuring underage girls in skimpy clothes and provocative poses are in any way sexual? You disgusting pervert!
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317350405
Tyler Malka is the biggest, most evil sellout in all of video game culture. He destroyed his own forum to make a home for SJWs because they were more profitable, all while the users lick his asshole like he's fucking Jesus Christ. He doesn't even believe in their ideals, he just wants to make money of it. He gleefully sexually assaults women overseas and bans anyone who takes issue with it.
>>317350691
Even if we're going there I don't see why you would bring in fantasy into reality.
I enjoy killing people in videogames, does that mean I want to do this in real life? This is what you're saying. Are you also claiming that if you play violent games you enjoy violence IRL? I assume you do play games with violence in them, correct?
>>317350430
because 10 year old anime styled titties = disgusting 3d shit
>>317350691
>>317350696
All of this is true.
And the worst part is he doesn't even play videos games. He doesn't care about them at all. His opinions and his forums are for sale to the highest bidder. It's just about money.
>>317350691
I'm a milf guy.
I'm also intelligent enought to realize that drawings 2D or 3D are...drawings.
>>317348060
sleep tight poker
>>317350760
Sexual arousal works differently so that's a faulty comparison.
>I'm not really gay, they're anime dicks!
>>317350778
Do we really need to get into this? Art is a representation of something. If it arouses you, you are aroused by what it represents. Why would people like drawn tits except that they look enough like real tits? Why else would it arouse them? Same for little kids.
>>317350430
>acting as if people should be jailed over fictional material because you personally don't approve of it
Here's your (You) you enormous faggot, now go back to NeoGAF.
>>317350691
Classic NeoFagger posting
>if your mind isn't as twisted as mine, you're a liar because I know you're like me who can't differentiate games and real life
>>317350430
so all the slaughtering in video games means you want to do it in real life, yeah? thats your line of logic, fucking idiot.
>>317350824
>Sexual arousal works differently
no it doesn't.
>>317350824
Sexual arousal is stimulation, much the same as getting accomplishment from violence.
You should really go back to NeoGAF.
>>317350538
>you don't think that there are people who visit both websites
No, I'm just saying the numbers probably aren't up there, as stated in my post.
But... I suppose I could be wrong reading this 10 page thread and at the end of the day looking at its homepag it is a big community.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=952249
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350893
>>317350865
Violence in video games is an abstraction, sexual arousal you feel in response to video games is real.
If a video game made you bleed you might change your opinion on violence in games too.
>>317350848
This is where I'm at. I think jailing someone over a drawing is some 1984 bullshit, even if it's content I find objectionable.
>>317350824
Can NeoFag come back online so this dumb shit can go back to his little liberal circlejerk?
>>317350929
I dunno. It can feel pretty good to mow down a bunch of niggers in GTAV.
>>317350824
>Sexual arousal works differently so that's a faulty comparison.
You're going off the premise of everyone defending this stuff getting sexually aroused by it, that's wrong.
Some people can differentiate fantasy from reality just fine and see risque content the same way they see gore in videogames, is just a game for us.
>>317350907
>No, I'm just saying the numbers probably aren't up there
Well, /v/ gets about 200 times the traffic that neofags gets.
/v/ crushes neofags in both Alexa and Compete rankings. Neofags isn't even relevant any more.
When people want news they go to Reddit. It's a great news aggregator. A good way to get all your news in one place.
When people want to talk about games freely and openly they come here.
>>317350929
You really are a dumb fuck. If you weren't stimulated by violence in games, you wouldn't play them.
>>317350957
it's online, dunno why that fag is here
>>317350929
>abstraction
nigger it's stimulation, because you obtain thrill from doing them in video games
>>317350824
I literally don't like real looking tits on a drawing though. I like fucking dodge balls with nipples.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350929
Considering porn pics do not make you feel as if something is actually touching your dick, the analogy makes no sense.
It is brain stimulation in both cases
>neogaf would defend this
>>317351046
>>317351002
Can't get more real than a boner m80s
Would you also defend real child porn because it's not a child, it's only a picture of a child?
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350824
It's been a long time since I've seen puritan-tier justifications like this. The only thing this post is missing is "what about the children?!".
>>317348814
The actual tweet: https://twitter.com/EleanorVarrot/status/664187637952028672
>>317351046
>as if something is actually touching your dick,
It doesn't for you ?
>>317349982
>meanwhile they defend sarah "edgelord" nyberg
>>317351029
That's not the point. The point of the analogy is that the effect on the player would be the same as if the events in the game were actually happening, not whether he likes it or not.
>>317351068
SWEDEN YES
>>317351093
Okay, so the main thing objectionable to masturbating to child pornography (If we're not basing anything off morals) Is that children are sexually expolited in it's creation, If pedophiles are masturbating to 2d anime toddlers, that's a positive thing, someones fucked up sexual urges are pleased, without hurting anyone, why should i give a shit?
>>317351190
It's exactly the same though. You psycopath.
>>317351034
fuck year
>>317351093
>Would you also defend real child porn
>because it's not a child
>real child porn
>not a child
Did you completely skipped the part about differentiating FANTASY from REALITY?
>>317351232
>>317351273
But it's only an image, anons. Sure, it's an image of an event that happened, but it's not like that could be undone anyway. The picture itself is harmless and if anyone were to be aroused by it it's only fantasy and not actually abusing a kid.
Didn't they have a thread about pedophilia and a mod threatened to ban a user who was a victim of sexual assault because they were "too biased" or something?
>>317351310
Of course they did. Even things that sound like exaggerations are real on NeoGAF.
>>317351093
>Would you also defend real child porn because it's not a child, it's only a picture of a child?
>>317351003
Well on the homepage it says 165,000 members, okay so not all of them are active obviously. But still if 5-10% would frequent it would be about 10.000 NeoGAFers visiting this place from time to time and I suppose those are substantial numbers.
>>317351093
Also, once again, you're going off thinking these characters/topics cause sexual arousal, I repeat, that's a wrong assumption.
I don't get boners from the Bravely Default chibi models, nor potato-chan from Xenoblade, but I sure as hell feel annoyed that Nintendo went and censored them.
>>317351262
They're not the same though. Yes, it's a fantasy, but with real consequences in one case.
>>317349982
jesus, i used to think of aeana as a normal person that liked JRPG, not this huge cunthead
>>317351301
Man, you should win an award for mental gymnastics. A drawn figure is not a rape victim taken photos of, you literal retard.
>>317350006
No, no, no you got it wrong.
They hate anime as a thing for pedo but preach compassion for actual pedo.
>>317351372
No, I think that one happened. I believe someone got demodded for it.
Happened after it came out that some psycho SJW tranny was a pedophile. They were defending him because he hated gamergate or something.
>>317351420
Both pleasure different part of the brain's reward system. So no. Both are the same.
>>317351301
The difference being that the very existence of a physical picture of a naked child in a sexual manner means there was a very high chance of child abuse.
You still have yet to provide any evidence that stimulation from sexual arousal is entirely unique from other forms of stimulation, but I have a feeling that won't stop you from being a massive moralizing faggot.
>>317351301
There is a big difference between an imaginary drawn character and a real child who suffered from real sexual abuse, the fact that even dare to compare them is frankly, disgusting, even for /v/
>>317351446
>>317351505
Okay, so if you made a drawing of it instead, would that be alright? What if you traced it?
>>317351520
So, you're perfectly okay with kids being sexualized if nobody is harmed. So its perfectly okay for you if mindless 10 yr old accept your offer of having sex on fair terms himself. Nice logic, but kind of a pedo desu senpai.
>>317351262
see
>>317351420
In the case of an actual factual picture of CP, a real life child was victimized in it's creation, the only victim in a drawing of a sexualized child is the tree that was used to make the paper. If it was made digitally than it's a wholly victimless "crime."
>>317351093
No because that would be 3DPG.
The difference between child porn and loli images is that lolis can still be sexy where as actual 3d children are too underdeveloped.
>>317351139
CP in Neogaf is not frowned upon.
Just look at some mods there.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317351557
this guys should win 10 points across the board for mental gymnastics
>>317351301
Wrong, children don't really have concepts of sex at young ages because we don't teach it to them, they cannot consent to sexual activity because frankly a child wouldn't know what sex even is, A drawing is not a person, a person is a person, drawings cannot feel be isolated or feel used because they don't exist, Masturbating to a child can fuck with a kids head in many ways, a Drawing doesn't even have a head.
>>317351498
>>317351505
You don't experience violence from a video game, it cannot hurt you. Therfore it is not the same.
Getting a boner is a real consequence, one that only applies to paedophiles when it comes to depictions of minors in compromising positions.
NeoGaf = loves CP
4chan = loves 2D
Learn the difference. It might save your day.
>>317351557
>What if you traced it
Not only has this literally never happened in the history of the entire world, you're just grasping at straws. But no, if someone happened to trace a picture of real CP it would not be alright. it's on an entirely different level than drawing naked animes and to act like it's the same is disingenuous.
>>317351557
>So, you're perfectly okay with kids being sexualized if nobody is harmed
No, I am okay with authors doing whatever they damn please with fictional characters, emphasis in fictional. I am not okay with anything that involves real children and real abuse.
>>317351301
>>317351686
wow
Here's a drawing of a dragon.
That means it's a real, actual dragon that exists and hurts people.
>>317351093
You totally missed the point of The Treachery of Images as his painting was itself a drawing and not a photography.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317351591
Friendly reminder there was a mod called Opiate who threatened to ban a person who was raped as a kid because she wouldn't sympathize with pedos.
He was quietly demodded because people found his public Flickr account which had a bunch of creepy ass pictures of kids.
>>317351686
You're talking like someone who doesn't have a penis and only has a vague understanding about how sexual arousal works.
>>317351616
>>317351710
You were the ones arguing that it's only an image and therefore not paedophilia. But some images make it more explicit than others that there's a relationship between the depiction and the depicted, don't they?
Now, you're getting tripped up by the actual harm involved but ignore that for the moment and think of the effect on the viewer. If he's aroused by images of children being sexually abused, you'd say that's a paedophile, wouldn't you? Yet if no children were harmed in the production of the image, but the effect on the viewer is still the same, you would argue that that person is not a paedophile? Those are separate things, I think, the suffering and the arousal (unless we're talking sadists of course but then wouldn't they also be aroused by fictional depictions of suffering?).
I know it's shitposting but I thought part of shitposting is that you shouldn't look stupid doing it.
>>317351726
Shh. Don't tell him. He just killed his own point without realizing it. It's hilarious.
>>317351427
I remember a thread about XSEED teasing their 2015 games from a year ago where aeana and two other mods came storming in and derailed it by attacking Tom over the use of the word 'trap' in Akiba's Trip instead of irrelevant retarded shit like 'G.I.R.L.'. It came down to regular users begging them to fuck off.
>>317351557
>Okay, so if you made a drawing of it instead, would that be alright? What if you traced it?
The drawing itself isn't wrong, but it doesn't make the real photo stop existing.
>comparing the "abuse" of completely fictional characters to a child consenting to sex when they're not capable of making rational decisions
Just kill yourself Neofag.
>>317351709
It's for the sake of argument, Anon. I'm trying to discover YOUR stance but you're all being very defensive and dodgy about it.
>>317351841
If that character happens to look like a child you might well be.
>>317351837
>>317351726
Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
>>317348203
>wants to do something
>others tell him to do something
>doesn't do something because he doesn't want it to look like he's doing it because they said
pretty childish tßh
>>317351616
>win 10
BOTNET!
NeoFaggers are manchildren who can't differentiate fiction and reality.
>>317348825
God forbid people get banned for being overtly, stupidly racist!
YFW you are neofag member and enjoy all the butthurt on /v/
>>317351787
>If he's aroused by images of children being sexually abused, you'd say that's a paedophile, wouldn't you?
No.
Plenty of people get turned on by all sorts of fucked up drawings but the moment it became real they'd be horrified.
>>317351787
>You were the ones arguing that it's only an image and therefore not paedophilia
No, they said that sexualising video game characters doesn't harm anyone, because it doesn't
>>317351920
Violence arouses the player aswell and rewards him with positive hormones. Learn your biology or fuck off to NeoFag senpai
>>317351969
If that character happens to look like a child you might well be.
>>317351125
>>317351125
ha. mods on that site are all niggers. i was isual on that site, got banned for saying 'muh nigga' in a chad warden thread. If i could go charlie hebdo on that site, i fucking would. allahu akbar niggers.
>>317351961
Why come here?
Are you free to post your opinion there?
>>317351310
>>317351372
It was Opiate.
Why are all posters on NeoFag niggers? Just me who noticed that?
>>317351686
You don't experience physical violence, but a mix of audio, visual, and haptic cues can trigger certain responses. This happens in every single medium, how everything except sexual arousal managed to escape you baffles me.
>>317351769
source? i know he was demodded and i always thought that he was a shit mod. but i didn't know this was the reason lol
>>317352004
Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
>>317352009
Being "rewarded by postivie hormones" != experincing actual violence when playing violent games. Again Violence in games is an abstraction. But the sexual arousel is real.
>>317351769
On Neogaf or 4chan?
>>317351920
>Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
>(when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
no, see, you can't just say "nuh uh, th-that doesn't count" and expect people to take you seriously
>>317352128
by that logic your point is also moot because you're not fucking the child
>>317351948
You really are retarded if you think "racist" posts being banned on Neogaf are anywhere near overt.
>>317352076
come? I've always been there anon, 4chin is my first choice
>>317352178
If that character happens to look like a child you might well be.
>>317352145
You're a pedophile, nobody takes you seriously already.
>>317351920
Pulling scenarios out of your ass for the sake of argument isn't something someone who's winning the argument does.
>>317348060
Sleep tight bacon
>>317352128
Sex in game = arouses your reward systems
Violence in game = arouses your reward system
I know you hate biology but that's how it works. By your logic, you are a psycopath for enjoying civilian killing sprees in GTA. You're fucked up.
>>317352258
Loli thread?
>>317352258
>using assumptions as arguments
welp, there we go
>>317352185
they're also liberal-in-skin only, as they are still rooted to their conservatism, you should check out their views on Islam, it's hilarious
>>317348203
This is why everyone hates you, America.
Bless Buddha we are now a japanese website.
>>317351724
I hope so, that picture is fucking badass.
>>317352127
https://archive.is/8CG2g
That's Opiate
>>317349982
>controversial opinions
>all he did was disagree with them in an argumentative thread
Post loli
>>317352297
This. A real child being sexually abused is no where near the same as someone who thought up an underaged moeblob and drew it naked. To even imply that they're similar does a disservice to and trivializes real victims and you should be ashamed of yourself.
>>317352297
>Sex in game = arouses your reward systems
>Violence in game = arouses your reward system
Only one of these has a real life consequence of experiencing sexual arousal.
Violence in games is an abstraction, you don't experience violence from it.
>>317351984
So that's how they feed, huh. Learned something from 4chan, never thought I'd see the day
>>317352258
If the person that you're killing looks like a child, you might well be killing a child. You're making retarded arbitrary distinctions and you refuse to see why everyone is calling you out like the retard you are.
>resorting to ad hominem and petty insults instead of making a point
>In every thread on /v/ that shits on Neogaf there is one guy that tries to derail the thread with furry or webm dumps
>it never works
It's proof enough for me that Neofaggers post on /v/. A /v/irgin would never feel the need to derail such a thread, he has no reason to do it. But a Neofag user does.
>Quick, get in faggot!
>>317352403
Holy shit there really is no way to reason with someone undergone the NeoFag brainwashing.
>>317352403
But you do experience adrenaline from a close encounter with an enemy player but you managed to blow him the fuck away at the last minute. You're getting too hung up on peepees standing up.
>>317352408
>If the person that you're killing looks like a child, you might well be killing a child.
Except unlike sexual arousal, you don't experince actual violence from video games so that's a faulty comparison.
>resorting to ad hominem and petty insults instead of making a point
>everyone is calling you out like the retard you are.
>call out person for doing the same thing you are doing
wait a moment, there is a name for that kind of behavior
I think it's called hippopotamus or something
>>317352403
>you don't experience violence from it.
what does experiencing violence mean?
>>317351920
>Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real
Again you're missing the point and the context: René Magritte got shit on for this painting with everyone calling him a dumbfuck because people believed it was a pipe.
Then everyone got BTFO'ed when he explained that it was not a pipe but the picture of a pipe.
Now have some hindsight and look at your situation.
>when it comes to sexual arousal specifically
Why specifically? Do you think people are baseless animals unable to keep their pulsions in check? Do you think THAT highly of yourself that you look down on us as mere animals? Do you even have proofs of your claims?
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317352498
Adrenaline isn't violence. Sexual arousal is sexual arousal, you're still getting off on underage children
>>317352506
Do you bleed or injure from playing a violent video game? No? Then you're not experincing violence.
>>317352465
Anyone who can't see the difference between that image and this disgusting thing is literally unreasonable and has drank gallons of NeoGAF Kool-Aid.
>>317352403
What the fuck does experiencing violence mean?
>>317351093
dont get what you mean. anyway im not even a waifufag and on top of that hate moeshit, but am all against censorship of any virtual porn not referring to actual children.
>>317352592
But people don't enjoy experiencing violence, they enjoy causing others to experience it.
>>317352592
You're getting too hung up on peepees standing up.
>>317352592
I experience the pleasure of killing someone, which is part of violence.
Reminder to not speak negatively of pedophiles on Neogaf lest you get banned
so there was a mod that was a fucking pedophile and they just demodded him? It's kind of sad that you want to just discuss videogames but on the internet everyone's is sick in the head holy shit
>>317352505
>Except unlike sexual arousal, you don't experince actual violence from video games so that's a faulty comparison.
If you want to talk about faulty comparisons, maybe you should take a look at the mirror. You're comparing psychological stimulation to physical injury. The brain does become stimulated from fictional imagery of all kinds, and you're obviously too mind bogglingly stupid to realize this simple fact.
>>317352729
they actually banned a victim of child molestation
>>317351839
And those are were the 3 mods that like "anime".
They're probably the craziest of the bunch.
>>317352631
physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill you or others
>>317352719
>>317352674
You can't inflict real violence on another person using video games. Sexual arousal you feel in response to video games is real.
>>317352796
What's even sadder is that /v/ is literally the best place on the internet to discuss video games.
