>>315617682
What do you think how it is

it's not anno anymore. its a casual builder that reeks of heading to consoles.

>>315617682

>Not even in the Top 10 Sellers List on Steam

>Getting shit reviews non-stop

I think you can guess how it is OP.

>>315617958

>shit reviews
>79 on metacritic

>>315617992

Sorry I forgot people still take that shit seriously.

What I meant to say was that paying customers have not been happy with the game.

>>315617682
Why don't uplay it?

Just doesn't fill like Anno anymore. The only DRM it has is Steam + UPlay. I didn't have that much trouble getting it to run so the game wasn't as sweet once I finally got in. They use to hide that shit like a forbidden fruit.

very easy game except the moon shit cost much
the side quest are boring mini quests
the military part is also meh

>>315617682
Similar to something you'd expect to find on a phone.

>>315617682
6,5/10
it's ok, but really not as fun as the previous games. you might wanna buy it if the prices goes down to ~15 bucks.

It's been raped. I didn't know it was possible to make an anno game (or any civ/city/economy/etc builder) that was only God for one play through but they found a way. And then charge $60 for it! With 2 of the build regions behind a dlc pay wall, no less. Anno is over, blue byte is over.