>Tons of rave reviews from several publications
>Certified FRESH on rotten tomatoes
>Even twitter famous MRA sh0eonhead loved it
>Ghostbusters 2 announced
>Reddit BTFO
>GriddleGirders and Ghostbros on pooicide watch, nowhere to be found
>feminists win again
>lonely manbaby virgins will NEVER recover
RIP /tv/
Previous Thread: >>72108796 [TRIGGER WARNING: DIAPER DAMAGED BABYMEN CRYING WHITE PRIVELEGED TEARS THAT AN ALL GIRL MOVIE SUCCEEDED]
>>72113984
if you have to justify why a movie is good, then its not good
>>72113984
Oh, hey there mr meemster.
I know OP is being ironic but he's still a faggot
>>72114057
I agree, OP is probably a bad person because of that.
>>72113984
This is autism, ironic or otherwise, it is autism
>>72113984
URRRRWEEB EEIN RAYDED?
>>72114092
i'm right on the border between the two trollfaces (as i distinctly remember "being here" for the 2010 WC with the constant vuvuzuela noise, so obviously i was aware and had been here b4 if i was at least casually used to coming here by the 2010 WC)
someone give me an award/medal/trophy for my exploits! 2010 summerfag = not an oldfag, not a newfag.... just a fagfag amirite?
yet another /tv/ gets BTFO episode
>>72114213
Learn to read, you're between Newfag and Cancer.
>>72114248
>>72114201
Fuck could you be any more obvious a samefag?
Nobody liked your piece of shit movie. You're the only one who seems like a whiny faggot, who's clearly pissed because it didn't come close to breaking even on its first weekend.
>>72114134
>faggot
Wow, edgy.
>>72114321
Sorry, I meant "Feiggot"
>>72114321
>edgy
Wow, memes.
>>72114312
>I didn't like it so nobody likes it
classic
>>72114312
>Nobody liked your piece of shit movie.
Critics loved it for the most part. I'm sorry that you and your redditor/4chan friends couldn't enjoy a comedy movie with 4 powerful female leads.
Maybe try having fun some time and you might learn that being sexist makes people dislike you.
wtf i hate men now
>>72114412
It's very easy to remove a (You) in paint, faggot. You're not fooling anybody.
>>72114412
>>72114413
Tell us what your favourite part/s of the movie was, I'm genuinely curious.
>>72114413
>Critics loved it for the most part
>the majority of positive reviews are either specifically blasting "haters" for not wanting to see it or conceding that it's dumb as shit and you have to turn your brain off to appreciate it
RT percentages mean fuck-all.
>>72114488
I'll give you my top 3:
1. Slimer's girlfriend was a riot.
2. Kate McKinnon stole the show but Leslie Jones is definitely going to be in more comedy movies. So important that we have more marginalized groups represented in film, especially comedy.
3. The post credit sequence. So good.
>>72114413
>critics loved it
"loved" is a strong word for 56%
I just got back from seeing Ghostbusters (2016) for a second time. Seriously the humor is so deep that I honestly picked up on some REALLY funny lines that I didn't the first time.
Feels good knowing I am personally contributing to the amazing box office success that is going to make all the neckbeards of 4chan cry their tears of impotent rage.
>>72113984
46 mill doesn't seem that good to me personally, why do people think it's good?
>>72114213
>2010 summerfag =
The beginning of the end. The worst kind of cancer.
>>72114558
Way to out yourself, dumbass. Confirmed bait.
>>72114507
>the majority of positive reviews are either specifically blasting "haters" for not wanting to see it
Probably because they live in reality and recognize that white males are threatening women with death and rape threats just for being in a fucking movie.
>>72114562
It has a 73% right now. Nice photoshop.
>>72114611
>>72114562
the very definition of cherrypicking
>>72114572
Because it's 46 fucking million dollars. How many millions of dollars do you have?
>(Estimate)
who's estimate?
>>72114567
Well goooooooood for you
>>72114636
>>72114611
>almost exactly 1 minute apart
Go ahead and shop out one of your (You)'s. I don't give a fuck.
>>72114607
>S/he actually saw the movie...I'll accuse them of baiting, that'll work!
>>72114558
>1. Slimer's girlfriend was a riot.
Can you be specific, I'd like to know what they did right.
>2. Kate McKinnon stole the show but Leslie Jones is definitely going to be in more comedy movies. So important that we have more marginalized groups represented in film, especially comedy.
What was Kate's best scene?
>3. The post credit sequence. So good.
Specifically what did the post credit scene do that was so good?
I want to actually be able to visualise the scenes, I'm open to having my opinion changed, but I won't just take "it was good" as gospel.
>>72113984
>The same exact thread twice in the catalog.
Janitor confirmed asleep. Post CP.
>>72114636
>clicking "top critics" is now called "photoshop"
>>72113984
>$46 million opening weekend
>$144 million budget
>This is a good thing
This is what feminists actually believe.
>>72114679
Those are both my posts. Idk what you're upset about?
>>72113984
>Ghostbusters rakes in huge profits opening weekend, several millions
top kek op. I can't believe retards fell for this.
>>72114657
>cherrypicking
I picked a movie that came out recently with a similar score but, funnily enough, isn't certified fresh, despite having better reviews.
>>72114657
>>72114740
I believe that people have the right to love any film, no matter how bad I think said film is, but ending statements with question marks should be a crime punishable by death kill yourself immediately.
>>72114740
>upset
Wrong again. I'm just enjoying watching you bury yourself.
>>72114708
taking this bait isn't good for you, sir
>>72114708
>Can you be specific, I'd like to know what they did right.
You have to be there desu but I would just say the CGI way they animated her was hilarious.
>What was Kate's best scene?
She has tons of funny reactions/responses to stuff in the movie but for sure the best part was the final fight sequence. So badass.
>Specifically what did the post credit scene do that was so good?
:X huge spoiler incoming but....
They tease the sequel movie where Zool plays the bad guy, huge twist
>>72114669
How many millions of dollars do you owe in loans to production/marketing teams?
Is he right?
>>72114562
>Average Rating
>6.3/10
>Audience Score
>51% liked it
I've refused to see better.
>>72114732
>"Top" Critics
>a bunch of old, white males
>whose sense of humor is as tired as their 1950s world view
Yeah, no thanks.
>>72114827
>man hating on all women led movie
color me surprised
>>72114827
Yes.
>>72114801
Deluded much, babe?
>>72114872
holy shit this movie was comfy
>>72114819
How is that relevant at all? Are you just upset that we're celebrating another feminist victory?
>>72114818
>:X
fucking faggot neck yourself
>rakes in huge profits
>it hasn't made a fucking dime yet
>it will take $800 million before it shows a profit
>not even 1/10th of that amount for opening weekend
>it will do less than half of that next weekend
>it's fucking dead, Jim
Yet another colossal failure of a big budget movie. Can't say I'm surprised in the least and it has nothing to do with the bitches in the lead roles either.
>>72114092
Why is reddit picture cancer but pepe is reddit but not mememaster?
>>72114872
>>72114827
>Prime Jack Black
>Mos Def when he was still sane
>Mia Farrow
>Danny Glover
>Directed by the guy who did Eternal Sunshine
Fuck yes, Be Kind Rewind was a sleeper
>>72114818
>You have to be there desu but I would just say the CGI way they animated her was hilarious.
So it was her body language that sold you on the character? I guess women are only useful as objects to you. Shame.
>She has tons of funny reactions/responses to stuff in the movie but for sure the best part was the final fight sequence. So badass.
What happened during the final fight that highlighted her specifically?
>:X huge spoiler incoming but.... They tease the sequel movie where Zool plays the bad guy, huge twist
Well the name is Zuul, but that doesn't really seem like a good point, if one of the best parts about the movie is actually in a different movie
This isn't sounding too promising, what a shame.
will /pol/ ever recover?
>>72114921
Kill you are self.
>>72114921
>How is budget relevant to profit?
>>72113984
>blatant b8
>60 replies
>>72114955
Imagine immigrants breeding with the locals.
Pretty much that.
>>72114931
>>72114961
lol
>>72115004
61 and counting!
>>72114849
It was fun for a while but it's pretty obvious right now. Stop, anon.
>>72114092
Yeesh, I'm an oldfag, although I think I drifted through 4chan as far back as the original years.
>>72114092
Tbh, the current years have been my favorite times here, and I'm not even really a regular anymore.
I think meme culture has just really evolved into something far superior to the memes of the oldfag years, and it's largely thanks to /tv/ and /pol/, of all places.
>>72115118
This is why mankind must be exterminated.
>>72114921
>celebrating the death of mankind
What a world we live in.
>>72114984
>So it was her body language that sold you on the character? I guess women are only useful as objects to you. Shame.
Omg it's a CGI ghost can you relax Donald
>What happened during the final fight that highlighted her specifically?
You'd have to watch it to understand but I would say her fierceness and comedic timing
>Well the name is Zuul, but that doesn't really seem like a good point, if one of the best parts about the movie is actually in a different movie
It's the way they tease it and sets it up for the next movie. Brilliantly done, Feig is hella underrated.
>This isn't sounding too promising, what a shame.
Either watch the movie or shut up
>>72115054
>opinions I disagree with are bait
At least you tried, goomergobbler
>ad agencies keep trying to push their high estimates of 46 million
>literally no legit numbers in yet
>outdid by a random pets movie that actually was legitimately decent
banned in china still
>will never recoup the funds they put into it
>will never be the success it needed to be
>those retarded feminists who went full retard with their reviews will still be full retard when all is said and done
i want editors to go down the list and start firing the people who thought it was acceptable to put headlines like "GIRLS RULE , GET OVER IT" or w/e that trash said
>>72115118
Australian shitposting commandos would never have reached their peak without years of relentless training.
Do not forget the past, anon.
>>72115317
>literally no legit numbers in yet
Are you blind or just stupid? Box office mojo has the real numbers and they're more than impressive.
>>72115349
>Domestic Total as of Jul. 17, 2016: $46,000,000 (Estimate)
>(Estimate)
>>72115280
>Omg it's a CGI ghost can you relax Donald
I for one think women should be fairly represented in all forms, this sounds like a movie promoting the opposite, so I don't think it's for me. My name is Thomas, by the way.
>You'd have to watch it to understand but I would say her fierceness and comedic timing
She sounds interesting, can you give me an example of one of her jokes, I understand the comedic timing would be of, but I'll accept that as a casualty for the clarity.
>It's the way they tease it and sets it up for the next movie. Brilliantly done, Feig is hella underrated.
My point still stands that it's more of a positive for the future movie than the present movie, and if that's one of the three best parts of the movie, it's a sign that the movie is lacking in memorable moments.
>Either watch the movie or shut up
I want to, but I'd prefer to know if it's good before I do, otherwise I'd rather save my money for something more worthwhile.
>>72115399
Yeah and that's just the estimate, it's probably way higher than that.
>>72114092
Reddit reporting in!
>>72115437
0/10
>>72115433
>I for one think women should be fairly represented in all forms
And they are. You're just trying to troll really poorly and it's super obvious, Ghostbro.
>She sounds interesting, can you give me an example of one of her jokes, I understand the comedic timing would be of, but I'll accept that as a casualty for the clarity.
I'm not going to post jokes verbatim. Why don't you watch the movie and find out yourself instead of unfairly judging it based on 1 trailer?
>it's a sign that the movie is lacking in memorable moments.
It's a sign that there's more comedic genius on the horizon. You asked me for MY 3 fave moments and I gave 3, it's not going to be everyone's top 3.
>otherwise I'd rather save my money for something more worthwhile
What could possibly be more worthwhile than supporting women in movies?
>>72115437
I doubt it. But I had a bit of a geez of the rest of that mojo website and found this in a written section.
>More realistically, we're probably looking at a domestic run around $135-145 million. Ghostbusters carries a $144 million budget (net after tax incentives and rebates) and received an "A-" CinemaScore for the under 25 crowd, and an overall "B+", on par with Bridesmaids and Spy and just behind The Heat's "A-".
So that's still less than what would be ideal for domestic, right? I don't see how this movie will be profitable but I can see Sony pushing to have as many as they can churned out.
>>72115433
Seen it, snuck in.
Just don't buddy. Don't see it.
If you want an accurate expression of how badly it fails, watch Angry Joes spoile review. You have tot take it with a pinch of salt due to his fanboyism, but ultimately every single flaw he lists is 100% true, only the level of genuine fanboy anger at how he expresses the flaws is skewed.
>>72115525
>What could possibly be more worthwhile than supporting women in movies?
Just about everything
>>72115578
Typical sexist bullshit I expect from the nerds on this website. Maybe leave your house and learn to have fun some time, fatass.
>>72113984
I saw it and it was exactly what everyone predicted and the scores on RT make sense. It was mediocre. The best praise i can possibly give this flick is it isnt as horrible as we thought it was going to be. Meh
>>72115610
>wahhhh you're sexist
still not seeing your movie
>>72115525
>What could possibly be more worthwhile than supporting women in movies?
Ass cancer.
>>72115636
At least you paid to see it unlike the rest of these baby dick virgin gamers.
>>72115610
If you dont like it then you shouldnt be here. Kind of like how i think Ghostbusters looks like shit so i wont be seeing it.
>>72115525
>And they are. You're just trying to troll really poorly and it's super obvious, Ghostbro.
I think if a female character is only "good" because of her body and how she uses it, then that's not a healthy representation of female characters. I fail to see where the trolling is.
>I'm not going to post jokes verbatim. Why don't you watch the movie and find out yourself instead of unfairly judging it based on 1 trailer?
I'm not unfairly judging it off one trailer, I'm genuinely curious and asking you to give me an example of her funny jokes, one spoiled joke surely wouldn't ruin such a great comedic character.
>It's a sign that there's more comedic genius on the horizon. You asked me for MY 3 fave moments and I gave 3, it's not going to be everyone's top 3.
Once again I can't really see this as a positive for the movie.
>What could possibly be more worthwhile than supporting women in movies?
From what you've said, I don't see these as healthy female roles.
>>72115663
Get slimed, rape apologist.
>>72115690
>paid
Lol no
>>72113984
You can't stop people with an agenda from seeing it multiple times. In any case, good for them.
>>72115610
topkek, what a little baby
we have our opinions, stop being so whiny about them
>>72115690
Go look at yourself in the mirror.
Than call a friend, a real one, or if you have none, find a total stranger. Ask them to slap you real hard.
Bitchslap like a pimp but with power of Djokovics backhand.
You need it.
>>72115610
You're not even trying. Please stop
>>72113984
>46M
>On opening weekend
>For a $144M movie
>Not even taking into account the cost of advertisement, which for "big" motion pictures can be over half the budget
>shills claiming estimates made by ad agencies means legitimate numbers
>>72115610
are you fat shaming?
check your privilege.
still, fine baiting all around, sir
better than posting all the blacked stuff
>46 million weekend
>144 million production budget
>100 million advertising
>still 200 million in the red
It bombed, and critics hate it. I do not understand. Is this reverse trolling feminist trolling to pretend they wanted to do badly?
daily reminder that fat women are not people and should be killed
FEMINISTS AND NUMALES BTFO
B
T
F
O
>>72115770
don't forget that this is a mega franchise picture that people waited nearly 30 years for. you have to look at potential money lost... what could have been profits and continued sequels
>>72115786
>fine baiting
what?
>sir
oh its a redditor
>200 mill budget(plus ads)
>profit
>>72115761
Not invading my space. I dont care if you are here or not. Im just pointing out that you said you expect typical sexist bullshit from the nerds on this site. If you expect that here, then why are YOU here?
>>72115708
>that's not a healthy representation of female characters
Stop trying to lecture me about something you know NOTHING about.
>I'm genuinely curious and asking you to give me an example of her funny jokes,
Okay fine. There's a scene where she pulls out both of her pistols during the final battle and she licks them and it's super empowering but also hilarious. Also she had a really good line that went something like "I could think of 7 good uses for a cadaver today" and her delivery is just spot on. The audience was in tears.
>Once again I can't really see this as a positive for the movie.
They flawlessly wove in an ending scene that comes as a surprise to many where they allude to another movie, and it isn't shameless the way they do it and makes you hungry for more. Hollywood, take note.
>From what you've said, I don't see these as healthy female roles.
You haven't even seen the movie you fucking vomit pile.
>>72115749
>single MRA telling anyone else to stop whining
Go make another iMDB account to give the movie a 1 star rating, loser.
>>72115860
Way too obvious
>>72115884
done
>>72115759
>typical goonergunk response threatening violence
Why am I not surprised?
Why can't you just accept the fact women and POC can be funny and are here to stay?
>>72115860
Everything you mentioned in your post was terribly cringe, and horribly written. So glad I will never see this shitfest. Also you mentioned empowering. Any review that uses that term into the trash it goes. Girl power is cancer.
>>72115860
>super empowering
>people are actually replying to this low quality bait
>144 million to make
>14 million opening day
>only 44 million over the entire weekend
>have to add international sales to make up a total of 66 million
>still marketed as a "success" because it made less then zero dollars
>still marketed as a "success" because it "overcame adversity"
I've never seen such obvious sexist baiting/pandering in my fucking life.
>>72115848
To drink all your male tears, obviously ;)
>>72115811
>It bombed
[citation needed]
>critics hate it
[citation needed]
Also it got an award from Rotten Tomatoes
>>72115860
Not him but I agree.
Leslie Jones is saying to hopeful young black women that the best they can hope to be is a stereotype that a minstrel show would blush at.
Shill false-flaggers pls leave, people won't stop replying to you shits.
>>72115860
>>Stop trying to lecture me about something you know NOTHING about.
I'm just doing the responsable thing and calling out sexist behaviour, why are you angered by that? Women deserve respect.
>Okay fine. There's a scene where she pulls out both of her pistols during the final battle and she licks them and it's super empowering but also hilarious.
I don't see what's funny about a woman licking a phallic item that has represented male sexuality for centuries, I definitely don't see it as empowering. It's just needlessly graphic.
>They flawlessly wove in an ending scene that comes as a surprise to many where they allude to another movie.
It's still not a positive for this movie, it's showing the potential of another movie, it's really sad someone as excited about the movie as you are sees this as the third best scene.
>You haven't even seen the movie you fucking vomit pile.
And all the "best" things you've pointed out are either sexist, or about a different movie. No thank you.
>>72115932
Wait for Hillary 2016 shit
>>72115947
Is that what you are doing? Im 100% sure you are just some dude trolling.
>>72115913
No cancerous tool, one hard educational bitchslap is not violence.
>>72115913
Pickers of Cotton is racist tbf
and women arent people, they're a meme you can cum in
>>72113984
/TV/ LITERALLY, CATEGORICALLY, FIGURATIVELY, ACTIVELY AND ANALLY
BTFO
T
F
O
>>72115932
>>have to add international sales to make up a total of 66 million
China doesnt even want it lmao
even the country built on bootlegs has its standards
>>72116010
>Women deserve respect.
I respect women enough to admit they're funny. Why can't you?
>a phallic item
Why are you sexualizing a weapon? Gross.
>It's still not a positive for this movie
That's your opinion and you've shown over and over in this thread that your opinion is wrong. Grow up.
>And all the "best" things you've pointed out are either sexist, or about a different movie. No thank you.
Fuck you.
>>72115990
It didn't bomb, it's performing rather lukewarm. It's not currently on pace to considerably out-earn its budget as other movies released with similar weekend numbers end up with around 150 mill in revenue. Couple this with the fact that a bunch of anticipated movies like Star Trek are coming out next week and there'll just be more competition.
>>72114092desu
>>72115761
MRAs are whiny cunts which makes them women.
Checkmate, Andrea Dworkin
>>72116056
>abusing women isn't violence
Inside the mind of a GeigerGraveler, everybody.
>>72116118
>your opinion is wrong
Really?
Why not just stop, its obviously getting too much effort to maintain maximum over troll.
>>72115990
According to Feig himself, it needs to make 500 mill to be a success. So if you go by that metric, it's doing poorly. It's not projected to make that much.
>>72115947
>jokes on you i was only pretending
nice thread
>>72114669
certainly not 500 Million. or anywhere close to 144 Million.
>>72116164
His opinion is that the movie is sexist and bad. It's a reflection of his own inner character. And some opinions can be wrong (i.e. sexism, homophobia, transphobia).
>>72116118
>I respect women enough to admit they're funny. Why can't you?
You find humour in their body and how they use it, that's demeaning, you haven't pointed out a single example of their personalities being the reason.
>Why are you sexualizing a weapon? Gross.
Why are you not aware of real world sexism, casual sexism is still sexism, so is sexualised micro aggressions.
>That's your opinion and you've shown over and over in this thread that your opinion is wrong. Grow up.
I think you need to grow up, and accept that sexism is wrong.
>Fuck you.
Why are you so unwilling to accept the fact that you've been sexist, and this movie is glaringly sexist? The only thing worse than sexism, is ignorance to sexism.
>>72114567
>Feels good knowing I am personally contributing to the amazing box office success that is going to make all the neckbeards of 4chan cry their tears of impotent rage.
Much appreciated! Please, go see the movie 10 times every single day for the entire time it's in the theaters! Also, give your entire net worth, all $2.50 of it, to Sony.
If you and all of your well-educated, open-minded, progressive friends do this, that'll show those cretins who won't pay money to watch this rehash^H^H^H^H^H^H homage to the 1980s classic.
>>72116158
>women are people
nice meme, cumslut
>>72114134
That interview was gold, what a face
>>72115437
BOM says it's projected to cap at around 150 million. It's not bombing, but according to Feig himself, it needs to be over 500 million to cover the marketing costs.
>>72116183
Delicious.
>>72116297
let me get in my meme time machine to wreck your grandma goodwill shit since it isnt 2012 anymore.
>>72116263
I am getting really bored of you trying to flip this on me and put words in my mouth.
>You find humour in their body and how they use it
We were talking about female slimer OMG you are so fucking dumb it's ridiculous. Please grow up. I can't even deal with this anymore so just drop it.
>Why are you not aware of real world sexism
You literally have 0 qualifications to even speak on this subject. I don't need you of all people some 4chan user to talk down to me trying to explain sexism. You're just gross and a pervert trying to make the gun into a penis. Stop it or I'm going to throw up.
>I think you need to grow up, and accept that sexism is wrong.
I'm not falling for any of this awful trolling, sorry babe.
>this movie is glaringly sexist?
Oh look more judgment despite having never seen the movie once. I am done responding to you. Pay your $15 and STFU.
>>72114057
>nyeeeeh you're PROBABLY a byeadd peersun
fuck i hate this """""""nonchalant""""""" schtick
>i'm only PRETENDING to be passive aggressive but if you vote trump can you please like remove yourself from my twitter list? kthxbye
This movie is literally the passion of the Christ for Feminism
>>72116398
>I can't even
we know, sweetie.
now fix your eyebrows and get an eating disorder
>>72116410
you're getting trolled
>>72115073
underage and banned
>>72115157
>>72116336
>wants to go back in time
Oh right, back before gay marriage and civil rights, right hun?
I'll be here in the present with evolved people enjoying hilarious summer blockbusters.
>>72116493
>I'll be here in the present with evolved people enjoying hilarious summer blockbusters.
So you dont hang out with black people?
fuckin racist cunt
>>72116398
>We were talking about female slimer OMG you are so fucking dumb it's ridiculous. Please grow up. I can't even deal with this anymore so just drop it.
Sexist representations of women is still sexist.
>You literally have 0 qualifications to even speak on this subject. I don't need you of all people some 4chan user to talk down to me trying to explain sexism. You're just gross and a pervert trying to make the gun into a penis. Stop it or I'm going to throw up.
You clearly need someone to explain sexism to you, read any feminist literature, guns are an often quoted prime example of phallic representations.
>I'm not falling for any of this awful trolling, sorry babe.
Why can't you even accept sexism is wrong? You're disgusting. Babe is also a sexually loaded word.
>Oh look more judgment despite having never seen the movie once.
Considering 2/3 of your argument for why the movie was good is sexist, and add that to your sexism and love for the movie, I'm okay with my conclusion.
>>72116520
>So you dont hang out with black people?
I don't have time to explain why that's offensive. Log off.
>>72116544
>Log off.
Im back slut, I have an SSD. maybe you should ask your dad or some other man in your life to explain what that is to you.
>>72114092
>tfw first came as a newfag, returned more consistently as cancer
>>72116562
>that jaw
>>72116544
cool bait my dude
>>72116612
Teenage waistband
Cute but dumb as a box of hammers
>>72116158
Kill your self retard.
>>72114827
HAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHA FEMINISTS BTFO
It's doing really well guys!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/reviews
>>72116544
>I don't have time to explain why that's offensive
>women in charge of putting in the slightest bit of effort
>>72114869
>obvious bait
color me surprised
post triggered women
>>72114035
Thats just dumb and not at all what he said.
>44 million
>Needs over 500 million to even break even
Will he be alright?
>>72116795
m8 those aren't dubs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Dc8a16vfkw
>>72114827
Be Kind Rewind was comfy as fuck
>>72116544
>>72116527
>>72116493
>>72116398
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/index.php?title=Offended&diff=next&oldid=10961
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/index.php?title=Offended&diff=next&oldid=10961
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/index.php?title=Offended&diff=next&oldid=10961
>>72116892
mmmmmommmmmy
>>72116398
It's hard to troll against "The Straight Man" archetype, isn't it?
Next time put more effort in, it too easy.
I'll rate your trolling the same as the movie, 1/10 needs more work.
>>72114134
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAu44wVgb58
>>72114092
Newfag
>>72114092
>Not calling the new generation "Autismofags"
>>72116410
>Cohen
Every time
>>72117152
YEAH LET'S DO SOMETHING CRAZY
SOMETHING
ABSOLUTELY
WRONG
>>72117040
knowyourmeme.com/memes/sea-lioning
>cost nearly 300 m with advertising
>expected revenue from USA around 120 m
>rest of the world is uncertain
>Sony hacks weren't even able to arrange screening in China
>generally you need to earn twice of the cost to be in black numbers
>new Ghostbusters franchise is kill
>feministkino is kill
/tv/ on suicide watch
>>72114092
>2007-2009
>oldfag
>>72117253
If nothing else, the Sony email leaks proved beyond all doubt that everybody at Sony Pictures is fucking retarded.
This movie has SNL no names. It should have been 80 million max.
>>72113984
hahahahahahahah
>>72117367
>>72114134
IS THAT WHAT YOU BELIEVE DON?
>>72113984
zoe quinn is so fucking hot
>>72117367
>>72116297
>delicious male tears
They really are the female version of r9k posters
>>72117367
So was that opening weekend?
>>72116297
She really likes cum that much?
The funniest thing about the Ghostbusters reboot is how they'll never make the budget back.
>>72115610
have a (you) my man
>>72117659
They're already a third of the way there. Not that hard to believe they'll make it up in the coming weeks, especially if you include international.
inb4 shill
>>72116336
who's the white tears demon on the right
>>72117707
Liz O'GingerMcIrish or some shit
>>72114657
By that metric, rating a film by critic reviews over user reviews must also be all cherry picking.
>>72117692
Considering the competition they have in the coming weeks the only way for them to get there is if they don't either gain audience or keep these numbers. It wouldn't be too bad with international help, but the rest of the world isn't retarded.
They won't make the recording budget back and the marketing budget is even more of a long shot.
Feig on Suicide watch
>>72117692
But that's fucking wrong. If it only made $46 million on its opening weekend plus the $19 million for foreign markets. Why would it fare better in the coming weeks with several other major movies coming out? It's not a third, it cost $145 million plus the $100 million spent on marketing/advertising. It's a fifth of the way and opening weekend are supposed to be movies biggest weeks. It will only make less and less with each passing week and I guarantee, if all these reports of empty theaters are true because seat reservations are empty in my town, that all the feminists who've seen this movie have already seen it.
There's literally no appeal to this movie, nobody wanted to see it.
>Advertising budget on par with a Marvel movie
>Only $46 million
>Didn't even beat "The Secret Life of Pets"
If this was the three biggest male comedian actors doing a Ghosbusters remake it would be considered extremely underwhelming and a borderline flop.
>>72116767
hey i have that same koo koo clock
>>72113984
Megamind did better opening weekend.
>>72117924
>$100 million spent on marketing/advertising
[citation needed]
>>72113984
Ghostbusters 2 was announced?
>>72117280
MOMMY
>>72118009
http://variety.com/2016/film/box-office/ghostbusters-box-office-2-1201816038/
>plus at least $100 million more in marketing costs. Insiders estimate that it will have to do at least $300 million globally to break even and substantially more than that to justify a sequel.
I'm not and American, so I do not understand - why anyone, FUCKING ANYONE in right mind would go to cinema to watch fucking Ghostbusters remake. Did people saw posters to this shit and deliberately said to themselves - I will go to movies to see this?
So the drama that surrounds this 'movie' is even more grotesque - it's like watching somebody complaining about Son of Mask not featuring Jim Carrey. Let it die, only retarded people will go to see it.
>>72118009
We don't know how much it is but Feig himself said they need to make at least $500 million with this movie. The fact is if it made a tenth of that it's opening weekend there's no way in hell that it'll make the $500 million mark. Making $250 million alone would be optimistic, this movie is not performing as well as they had hoped.
>>72118102
People who love Ghostbusters but didn't see reviews or the trailer. It'll bomb even more in Week 2 once word of mouth gets out. Remember they quarantined reviews coming out as long as possible to boost the opening weekend.
>>72118009
http://deadline.com/2016/07/ghostbusters-weekend-box-office-1201787149/
>Some believe that for the estimated $100M-plus P&A spent by Sony, Ghostbusters should have cleared $50M-$60M.
A simple google search can find you this stuff mate
>>72113984
what did sh0eonhead say about Ghostbusters?
The last avengers movie made its production costs on the first weekend.
In any case despite what shitposters day Sony is going to lose money on this.
Think about it, they have to make $250 mil (just over 4 times their opening profits) just to break even.
>>72117935
This. I'm actually surprised it's doing this poorly.
>>72118276
She loved it, said it was hilarious.
>>72114827
Top taste, Be Kind Rewind was grate.
>>72118299
I feel like you're not being completely honest, friend.
Pretty sure the next ghost they'll be busting will be Paul Feig after he kills himself
>>72114092
I wouldn't wear 15 years on this cesspool as a badge of honor.
>>72118340
Check her twitter if you don't believe me. I usually don't agree with her on anything (like gamergate and MRA shit) but she really nailed this.
Imagine if Suicide Squad came out this weekend. Ghostbusters wouldn't even make back it's budget
>>72118432
>Ghostbusters wouldn't even make back it's budget
They won't anyway you monumental retard.
Do you think they'll make $250 mil after a 60 mil opening weekend?
How much did BvS make in it's opening weekend?
>>72118484
Over $400 mil, could have googled that you cunt
So is this an Amazing Spider-Man situation where they will push forward with sequels no matter how badly the 1st preforms?
>>72118473
china will save them
>>72118589
It won't be shown in china
>>72118589
This isn't being shown in China
>>72118589
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ghostbusters-denied-release-china-910563
No its not being released in China
>>72118589
>>72118635
[heavy feminist breathing intensifies]
>>72118589
Not with a Gorilla in the cast
>>72118473
Budget is 144mil. I wasn't including Marketing. I have no faith in this movie making back the combined total
>>72117323
Are you retarded?
>>72118676
At this point even $144 mil is in doubt, generally viewing goes down after the opening weekend. That and the terrible reviews mean that it'll get even less sales.
Sony chose to target the feminist SJW demographic and have lost horribly
>>72118734
No, are you?
>>72113984
gamergate will never recover from this, it's over
