Wow these are amazing intellectual reviews that really make me want to see this film.
>>72016446
>>72016446
really made me think
>>72016446
really make me think
>>72016446
Wtf women are funny now
>>72016446
I am starting to notice flaws in that review
Really makes you think.
Wow I love ghostbusters now.
Why would an honest media publication like the new york times lie to us?
Really makes you think.
Why are plebs pretending to care about film criticism now?
For years you iqlets called Brody and White pretentious and anyone that agreed with them hipsters. Has your taste film improved now or are you still the tasteless drones you were when you cried hipster and that fun should be allowed since film is supposed to be """entertainment"""
or is this another excuse to shitpost and stay away from developing better taste again?
>>72016446
Brobabiez BTFO
>>72016775
bumbabzies from grumperglomp BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
Truth be told, I never cared once about the all female cast until all the controversy. I might have even watched the movie in theaters. But nope. They chose to put the focus of attention on 'girl power' and calling any negative feedback misogynistic.
Now i have zero interest becauseif the movie does well;
>women beat out the men! We can compete with them too!
And if the movie bombs:
>misogynistic hollywood opress women, causing box office bomb
Quality of the film doesnt matter one bit. Its all about the controversy.
>>72016815
GIMPERGOMP FUCKING DESTROYED
HOLY SHIT
>girls rule women are funny get over it
>3.4 million international open day
>>72016815
gross, is that real?
>>72016877
HAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
>>72016880
Yup.
She just can't get enough.
>non-comedian male is the funniest thing about the movie
>>72016446
"THE NEW YORK TIMES" IS NOW OFFICIALLY WORTH LESS THAN DIRT
THEY MIGHT EVEN BE PISSED SONY IS USING THEIR BRAND FOR THIS UNABASHED AND PARTICULARLY VAPID SHILLING
WHAT A GARBAGE RAG
>>72016976
>OFFICIALLY
They've been worth less than shit decades ago.
It's probably one of the biggest globalist bullshit supporting newspapers.
>official twitter page has "certified fresh" logo pasted fucking everywhere
They SOOOOOOO paid for those reviews and are just showing it off like a trophy now.
fuck feminists calling me a bad person for hating this movie. If it were the cast of seth rogan and 3 other male meme actors I'd hate it just as much
>>72017078
Brobaby detected
>>72017046
ITS STILL THE NEWSPAPER OF RECORD FOR ACTUAL THINGS
BUT THEIR CULTURE SECTIONS AND SJW HIRES ARE QUICKLY RUINING THEIR BRAND ACROSS THE BOARD
ITS AN ACCELERATION OF GARBAGE MORESO THAN A DECADE AGO
>>72017119
>community
pissbabby manbaby pleb***
>>72017148
Okay.
Stop yelling at me.
>>72016446
its like they want me to think in one specific way without questioning it
>>72017262
LITERALLY:
> GET OVER IT SHITLORDS!
> t. THE NEW YORK TIMES
TALK ABOUT PISSBABIES
>>72017163
>he can't into memeing correct posts
#mad/ass/fuck
>>72016446
lol
FUCK YOU MEN!!!
please come see our movie n buy tickets pls!
> Make movie for skinheads
> advertise to skinheads
> have thousands of skinheads shilling your movie for you
WHY DON'T NIGGERS WANT TO SEE MUH MOVIE!??!!?!?
ARE NIGGERS SCARED?!?!
>>72017523
>women are funny = fuck men
literally no. get your head out your ass.
WAITING TO SEE THE PRESTIGIOUS NEW YORK TIMES LOGO SLAPPED UNDER SOME BRAINDEAD SJW RANT LIKE THIS ONE
THEY'RE ROLLING DOWN THE INFANTILE SJW HILL, ITS JUST A MATTER OF TIME NOW
SONY DESERVES THE FLOP ITS GETTING, AND ITS MEDIA LACKEYS LIKE THE NYT DESERVE TO BE LEFT HOLDING THE SHILLING BAG WITH JUST THEIR DEVALUED BRANDS AT THE BOTTOM
Seriously, how the fuck Is 73 percent with an average score below 6.5 considered "certified fresh" and can a movie lose its certified fresh sticker?
>>72017812
Are they really thinking that we will get mad when they call us "babymen"?
>>72016446
Reminds me of john romero will make you his bitch thing
>>72018101
Well, it's kinda working.
>>72018171
Nope, we're laughing at them. We're only mad about how shitty the movie itself is
>>72018101
I'M MAD AS HECK BRO
>>72016446
Oh god, shut up. You have nothing better to do tonight and you know it.
>Manohla
DESIGNATED
>>72016877
It's a solid 3.4 though
>>72018752
BEHOLD
THE SLAYER OF CYNICAL FEMINIST PROPAGANDA FLICKS
ENJOY THIS PHALLIC DOG, SONY
>>72016446
that's not a review. that's a pull quote..
>>72018905
ALL HAIL PETZ
ALL HAIL PETZ
>>72016446
I go back watching Spy.
Because Rose Byrne and her utter bitchiness made that movie, also Jason Statham.
>>72017799
what about when it's phrased "fuck you, women ARE funny"
>>72017812
must be a woman because all that and it's not even funny.
>>72016446
>all critics - 73%
>top critics - 57%
>audience - 45%
When was the last movie where top critics vs all differed this much?
>>72016733
>>72016775
>>72016815
How much training do shills get?
Do you get a course in advanced memes so you can post like us? Or maybe they just give you some prebuilt phrases and you just fill in the blanks.
>>72016446
I like how they kept claiming for weeks that the whole woman angle wasn't actually that big, this movie is going to be garbage.
>>72019042
>us
when did you start posting on /tv/? Because if its after 2013 you aren't "us", meme tourist
Why is this v movie the one feminists are hitching their horses to? I can somewhat understand their idiotic attempt to make their voices heard, but why this piece of shit?
Is it just because it's a somewhat beloved franchise that was loved exclusively by men?
>>72018905
based dogs
>>72019098
Is asking for credentials once you are questioned part of the training too?
>>72019121
>I can somewhat understand their idiotic attempt to make their voices heard, but why this piece of shit?
Casting department full of gender studies majors, it snowballed from there.
>>72017812
>someone actually got paid to write these sentences
>>72019165
whats wrong? are you one of these meme parasites that actually did show up after 2013?
was it baneposting or star wars 7 that brought you here to beat around the bush when asked about your authenticity to this art board?
>>72017812
>>72016446
yes women can be funny
but this 4 sure cant
>>72018957
then still no?
It's clearly targetting manbabbies like those in this thread who think the ENTIRE female species can't do something inane like make yuk yuks. It's braindead thinking analogous to wanting women to be banned from driving or from going to school just because they can't handle it or some shit.
>>72019098
>le oldfag meme
delet this
>>72019039
BvS
It was the other way around.
>>72018905
That movie was cute as fuck
>>72019042
>How much training do shills get?
Not much. You must follow guidelines though.
>>72019283
Fine, lets assume I'm one of those 2013 posters. Do you get training to post in that style?
>>72019341
Why do you do this?
Is it monetary compensation? Thrills from shitposting?
What? I'm genuinely curious, because there's no way you believe the shit you're posting.
>>72019391
not believing in equality is retarded. stop being retarded.
you're on a sloppery slope towards being literally ISIS.
>>72019410
>believing
Is equality a religion?
>>72019387
why do you still refuse to answer the question? and training for what? are you questioning by authenticity to authentic /tv/ you fucking tourist?
>>72019391
ha ha yeah misogyny's cool ha ha
totally makes me feel like more of a man ha ha
>is anyone else as irrationally mad over a movie I'm not interested in as much as I an?
>people are still replying to the stale bait
When will these reddit """mra""" ""piss babymens""" leave our cinema board lads
>>72019444
equality is obvious to anyone who's interacted with a real life female.
shit waste of trips
>>72016446
women are just not funny
just leave comedy to men
>>72019471
They're all status quo warriors from reddit. They'll continue to deny their hatred of this movie is about women even when they continue to attack it while ignoring every other shitty movie that gets made.
>>72019474
>equality is obvious
There's nothing obvious about equality. There's no equality between people of the same gender and there's definitely no equality between men and women. Your concept of equality is trying to push everyone into the same meatgrinder.
>>72019039
Barbershop 2
>>72016446
wow your insistence on perpetuating this bizarre marketing scheme is making me want to watch this movie even less than i already did
>>72019451
Lmao roastie's getting t-t-t-t-toasty
>>72019516
There's an actress from my country that's funny and good looking but they never give her any real role anymore so she just shows up at dumb talk shows and doesn't get to use her full talent :(
>>72019451
>>72019447
> why do you still refuse to answer the question?
Because it isn't related to the original question. But if your autism doesn't let you answer the question because of the way it is worded, you may change "us" to "a regular /tv/ poster" or something.
>>72019365
It's 27% (all critics) vs 23% (top critics) now.
Manola Dargis is a fucking shit writer, God knows how many cocks she had to suck to get her position. A O Scott for the Times is great though.
>>72019586
you're not "a regular /tv/ poster" either though. you are a filthy fucking meme tourist.
>>72019622
I know you don't have to be a genius to be a professional shitposter for a corporation, but you are one dense motherfucker.
>>72019451
Women are not funny
>YOU
How pathetic.
>>72018887
I've got a solid 3.4
>>72019558
>I-I'm n-n-not t-triggered,,, y-you aaa-aa-a-are
lmao kill yourself tripfag
>>72016877
Thats 3.4 million from a single nighttime showing. why is that bad?
>>72019777
>getting shit on by a trip
>wasting lucky trips with a literal 'no you are'
Just die already
>>72019781
>single showing
>>72019781
Because it's 1 night EVERYWHERE that isn't the United States.
It's bad.
>>72019749
>>72019569
>>72019558
lmao looks like I triggered the male rights activists
>>72019536
THIS
literally believing in equality without admitting it has to be forced is the real climate change anti science culture evolution exists to them but it stopped at the skin level for humans lol
>>72019836
toasty
o
a
s
t
y
What's his name again?
>>72019836
>lol you're fuckin retarded
GOT YA! HA HA!
>>72019886
PAUL FLOP
>>72019886
Aw Frig
>>72019536
Equality is equal opportunity, including opportunity to fail, and equal rights, as in right to appear in the same fields as men wherever they want.
Equality does not mean men and women don't have differences, dummy.
>>72019886
Paul Fag
>>72016446
i will watch it, in camrip
If someone out there honestly, HONESTLY is happy to see manbabies BTFO by what clearly must be a good movie then go watch it.
Please go watch the movie, go ahead, you will not have the same opinion when you walk out. Ignoring the marketing this film was an insult. It's absolutely awful and knowing that many feminists are calling this the "final battle" is like #blacklivesmatter betting the future of their movement on EA's latest disaster.
It was awful. It was just awful...
>>72019886
>>72019940
His highschool bullies got it right decades before his career was even a thing.
>>72016462
>opens his mouth to hmm
>>72019926
>Equality is equal opportunity
If it was that way this thread would not be a thing, anon.
>>72016733
No mexican directors plebe detected
>view available seats for a 10:45 PM showing
>only 4 seats taken
>>72019986
Confirmed shit gif >>72016462
>>72019886
Paul "i made reddits favorite meme show and now they're upset i remade a pleb dogshit movie" Feig
GIRLS RULE, GAPING-GOOP IS KAPUT
>>72019998
REKT.
they want to free from criticism for failing based on those differences
its already illegal to deny anything based on race or gender and you will never be able to legislate opinion.
>>72016446
Embarrassing.
>>72019998
yes, because manchildren can't accept a simple fact like women can be funny.
until they can learn to not judge an entire gender based on one or two women they see in the media (who they are already predisposed to hate) then there will never be equality.
Not hard to understand.
>>72020246
>>72020310
There simply will never be equality because again that does not exist in nature
by law things are equal as they can be in opportunity sense
what you wont end is opinion and being criticized for failing based on the differences which is what you want you literally want what trannys want..for everyone to follow your fantasy despite reality.
>>72020310
>yes, because manchildren can't accept a simple fact like women can be funny.
Do you know at least one person who legit thinks that no woman is funny?
>>72020310
That Spy movie with fattie was funny.
This trash? Nope.
>>72020246
>>72016815
some neckbeard spend time editing shit!
LOL!!
>>72020378
already responded to this. equality as in opportunity and rights. Not equality as in homogeity. What you're assuming is that women and men are so different they can't be funny, which is the dumbest thing you could possibly think akin to thinking women can't drive or do maths.
Funny is a result of creative aptitude. Funny isn't biological. The funny bone isn't literal lmao.
>movie literally puts its first foot forward on a queef joke
>>72020386
do you even know where you are holy shit.
>>72016446
The death of Rotten Tomatoes credibility
>>72020609
*homogeneity
>>72020635
>legit
>>72020310
You have to accept that the mass majority of Women are compltely unfunny compared to men. The reason behind all the flack is due to the knee jerk sjw response from Hollywood n such for fuck heads like yourself. Look at Tina Fey. She's fucking boring, has horrible delivery, is completely unoriginal as far as "haha I'm a woman poop and farts*shrugs*", then when she's put in charge of SNL it nose dives into a complete and utter humorless pile of poo.
So not only are we the masses being patronized into shitty unfunniness during our miserable lives because of your equality boner, were also the bad guys for calling out unfunny shit as unfunny.
The Latino community has given it a negative review.
>>72020675
if twitter and 4chan don't count, congrats you just eliminated everyone who has an issue with the film.
>>72020698
I'm not asking about the film.
>>72018905
Where is the closeup of his face with the "LONG" from the sign underneath it?
why does this shit remind me of the scene in Spinal Tap when they are discussing album covers. They can't show them whipping a chick. But if a chick is whipping then the TOTALLY FINE.
>>72020685
>Look at Tina Fey. She's fucking boring
so your entire argument is based on your subjective opinion. and that anyone who doesn't conform to it is sjw.
Yup, literal bigot retard. you checked all the boxes.
This is why we need to reorient society towards accepting equality (as in rights and opportunity).
>>72020246
What the fuck
>>72020609
Go fuck yourself. Its more believable to you that their is this massive conspiracy to keep female comics down, than a simple fact that men are commonly funnier than women?
>>72020760
Name one box office classic comedy Tina Fey wrote or stared in, or give one other reason as to SNLs demise
>>72020690
They count as white males for the lefties
>>72020609
Women will never develop a good sense of humor because the concept is completely alien to their biological evolution.
You have to be a risk taker, brash and open to compete and utter humiliation.
A woman will take 2 hours getting dressed simply because the thought of getting caught outside not at their best completely overrides their entire thought process.
So yes, there literally IS a funny bone and women will never develop one.
>>72020782
show me a world where there are as many female comics as men. THEN give me the "facts". You don't understand equality.
of course more men in comedy = more good male comedians. Ever heard of the law of averages?
>>72020246
>please respond
>>72020760
>That bitch was in Mean Girls!
>Better put her in charge of one of the most successful comedy shows in history that's birthed legends of every decade!
>It crashes and burns into an unfunny nightmare
>Well at least there's equal opportunity :]
Kill yourself.
>>72020823
first of all box office does not equal quality.
second of all Mean Girls is a cultural touchstone among tweens. It's literally the millennial Clueless.
how are you this dumb?
Is there a single positive review for this movie that doesn't start with either "haha girl power!" or "haha stay mad manbabies!"
Call me crazy, but it doesn't seem like anyone is judging it based on its own merits.
>>72020866
equality of opportunity is not equality of outcome
>>72020866
0% of female comedians are funny, some male comedians are. Easy math
>>72020914
>Better put her in charge of one of the most successful comedy shows in history that's birthed legends of every decade!
assuming this is talking about snl, you have no clue about the history of snl. It was always a shitshow and its absolute worst period (early to mid 90s) had a male showrunner.
your argument doesn't make sense.
>>72020866
So you want to force a female comedian stereotype even if it leads to failure like SNL..to prove what? What if it turns out that women are actually unfunny. Thatd make you happy?
>>72020927
>Call me crazy, but it doesn't seem like anyone is judging it based on its own merits
That would be sexist
Remember, women get a pass regardless of talent or skill
>>72020940
right. but we're not getting either and misogynists are the problem.
>>72020950
look at how many female comedians there are compared to men. you need context. There are far more unfunny men than there are funny men.
>>72016446
>I decided this movie would get a high score when I saw the cast
This should cost someone their job as a critic
>>72020973
Yeah, there's been luls and come backs. The 90s decade was fucking defined by SNL comedies you dunce.
SNL has been shitty for like 12 years now, and everyone has noticed. Tina Fey even had to write a butthurt 'dear internet' retort
>>72020846
>A woman will take 2 hours getting dressed simply because the thought of getting caught outside not at their best completely overrides their entire thought process.
>>/1950s/
if this is your best argument then wew, I hope you like making strawwomen cause you'll be making them for a long time...
>>72021021
>spend $144 mil on a movie with all female cast
>make 3 mil internationally on its opening night because it's not funny
>you're still complaining how there's no equal opportuniy
You have to be 18 to be on 4Chan. Or are you actually that fucking stupid?
>>72020978
again, you're making no sense. Tina Fey's reign of SNL was far more successful culturally than the 90s, which was headed by a man. The latter Farley years were some of the worst comedy ever produced. What does that prove? Nothing. Just like Fey's reign proves nothing.
The only difference is you're assuming Fey represents ALL women, but you don't assume the male showrunner represents all men. That's called cognitive dissonance.
>>72021167
because one movie does not solve nor prove equality, you dumb cunt.
>>72021080
Good point, women have literally made it fashionable for them to go out wearing practically pjs (yoga pants and a shirt) fuckin slobs
But it was a man and a woman that wrote it
>>72021174
Do you know how ratings work retard?
>>72021248
ur mom is a woman and ur dad is a man LOL
>>72021234
What is stopping women from making films?
>>72021234
So you actually expect people to spend their money on possible utter failures with evidence off utter failures in the past? You're genuinely a stupid person, congratulations.
>>72021328
http://www.bostonherald.com/entertainment/television/2015/12/snl_hits_second_best_ratings_in_22_months_with_tina_fey_amy_poehler
they literally guest starred and had the best ratings in over a year. nice try, misogynycuck.
>>72021368
Creativity, or lack thereof.
>>72021381
people spend their money on shit no matter if it's made by men too. Michael Bay? Zack Snyder? Doesn't mean all men don't deserve to make or star in films.
congratulations, your mother didn't teach you logic.
>>72021368
I can't believe people are still asking this question and would rather assume there's something wrong with an entire gender. Educate yourself and stop making yourself sound like an ignorant retard
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/sep/27/geena-davis-institute-sexism-in-film-industry
>>72016733
patrician? lmao this is entry level my dude
>>72021398
>comparing Tina feys ratings to Tina Feys ratings
>SNL was among the top 10 most watched shows in 1998, now hardly anyone fucking tunes in. That was the whole fiasco with the anniversary that just happened because SNL was so in the toilet.
>>72021508
Yeah, but they still make money. Want to compare what Micheal Bays films make opening compared to this unfunny pile of shit?
>>72021368
It takes years of small time shit and bullshitting your way up the nepotism ladder to even get the chance to direct a movie.
Women unironically believe that they should just be handed the reins of a huge movie simply because they have a vagina.
>>72021058
Not even that anon but this backpedaling is cringe worthy
Tina Fey like most comedians has ups and downs. You dont think classic Ellen is funny? Or Poehler in Parks&Rec?
women were considered too hysterical to be scientists and doctors for a time as well, and the statistics were against them due to male dominance in those fields.
Not a patriarchal conspirancy, just how it is.
>>72021508
>People spend THEIR money on shit I don't like, so they have to spend money on stuff I like or else it's not fair
>>72021622
and if you give more women big franchises maybe there'd be more higher grossing films. you don't know because there aren't any.
Frozen was co-directed and co-written by a woman and I hear that's pretty financially successfull...
>>72017557
>> Make movie for skinheads
>> advertise to skinheads
>> have thousands of skinheads shilling your movie for you
>WHY DON'T NIGGERS WANT TO SEE MUH MOVIE!??!!?!?
>ARE NIGGERS SCARED?!?!
underrated
>>72020246
>>72021174
Except SNL's liberalism and feminism led it to being completely irrelevant and its lowest ratings and viewership in its entire history.
>>72021675
You might want to look up who the writers for parks and rec and 30 rock were.
Hint, it's mostly men :)
>>72021675
>Ellen
No
>Amy Poehler
Who? You mean that random blonde chick that got in the way of Ron Swanson and that one brown guy?
>>72021582
Not that anon but
>Tina Fey being the sole variable on the success of the show
Competition has skyrocketed over these years. Many other factors are present, while other anon has pointed out that in The past the show has faced equal if not worse quality drops.
>>72021714
So clearly women have been given the chance, some succeed but most fail. So they aren't invested as much. Why are you still complaining?
>>72021754
Well people tend to disagree, both are considered pretty funny
Have they made absolute shite? Yeah but so have many of the greats.
>>72019341
put your trip back on brad
I find this "women are funny"... funny.
For example, this spanish program was about 5 women interviewing someone, which one of them being a role (Serious, Sexy, "Funny" girl).
First season they had a female comedian.
Now in the new season they couldn't find a female comedian so... They put a man in drag.
I'm kekeing everyday with this shit.
Also right beside the guy is a lesbian btw.
>>72021746
And if you watch behind the scenes they allow massive mad lib from the cast
>>72019098
>2013
What? Is that when you started posting?
Change that to 2009, newfag.
>>72021714
>if you give more women big franchises
>if you give more women
>if you give
>give
there is no giving in this world only taking. that is a hard truth women don't seem to understand.
>>72021770
So competition is what made SNL unfunny?
>>72021675
You could replace Amy Poehler Literally with any girl you found off the street, and the cast of men would still make that a popular show.
>>72021809
>So clearly women have been given the chance
No.
>From 2007 to 2014, women made up only 30.2% of all speaking or named characters in the 100 top-grossing films distributed in the US, according to research conducted by Dr Stacy Smith at USC Annenberg. A staggeringly low 1.9% of those films were directed by women. Success stories such as Kathryn Bigelow, who was the first woman to win the Academy Award for best director with The Hurt Locker (2009) are extremely rare (and when I ask one Hollywood producer why Bigelow broke through where others did not, he replies without missing a beat: “Because she was married to [Titanic director] James Cameron. They knew if she fucked it up, he could step in and save the day.”
I honestly feel bad for all the feminists and SJW shills defending this movie. They know that when this movie fails, the studio execs aren't going to blame themselves, or the fact that people are tired of remakes/reboots of classic "Lightning in a Bottle" films like Ghostbusters and Robocop, nor the fact that it was a over-budgeted movie with a long climax action scene that didn't need to be there, nor the obvious fatigue people have over Melissa "Plays the Same Character in Every Movie" McCarthy, but on the idea that general audiences "Don't like female comedies led movies". They know that this shitty movie might stop a handful of actually good female led movies from being made.
So they shill, again and again.
As Hard as they can.
But honestly, I follow the take Comicbookgirl19 had on this, I ain't this shit so that those motherfuckers don't get the wrong idea to remake Back to The Future. Seriously, if they do that, I would fire bomb some office.
>>72020736
Tried my hand at it, not sure if you meant one that was already made.
>>72016446
wtf I love female comedians now
>>72020760
>reorient society
you need to leave
>>72021872
>the cast of men would still make that a popular show.
yeah men like Jimmy Fallon. christ, get a grip.
>WOMEN ARE FUNNY
>funniest character is the guy
>>72021880
>"They knew if she fucked it up, he could step in and save the day.”
^See this?
>>72021236
"""progress"""
>>72020690
i'm amazed he could scrounge up an extra 3 dollars to see the film in the first place.
>>72021973
>did you see the part that's meant to point out how unfairly women are judged
yes I did. did you?
>>72021872
Audrey Plaza? Rashida Jones? Retta?
All essential members of that cast. If you watch the show you would know that they have all particpated as much if not more than many of the male cast
>>72021960
Jimmy Fallon was on Parks n rec?
>>72021880
Again you are pointing out to failures on women's part as conspiracy against them.
you all go from
>le industry makes these cuck films because they will sell and its time to diversify its the most monetarily sound policy
to
>the industry just hates women and does not want to make all this money (that does not really exist) by producing quality female made movies
its one or the other m8
>>72021861
>not in the decade club
congrats
>>72022002
Literally could not exist and the show would of been fine,
This is reality.
>>72021880
and women made up a tiny portion of construction workers. nothing wrong with that. no need to change that. we are suited to different roles
>>72022002
I have no idea who any of those people are
>>72021997
>unfairly judged
Ironic that the term "man baby" has been thrown around so much.
>>72016446
WHAT THE HELL IS HER PROBLEM?
>>72022076
THIS
women's place in garbage men is apart of the conspiracy as well I assume.
Asian men's representation in the NBA is doff a holocaust of oriental rights.
>>72022027
how is it one or the other. The industry has a bias, as the quote says. there isn't equality, as the quote says. women are discriminated against as unsafe bets, as the quote says. And women can be part of successful films if given the opportunity.
it's not an either or. it's an And.
>>72022076
You don't need physical strength to be a director. Did Peter Jackson lift weights to direct LOTR? You need to be a top down manager. They can direct just fine.
>>72022103
>entire thread judges gender of women based on a handful of examples
>yet they make up 1% of mainstream directors
>not unfairly judged
get your head checked, m8
>movie spends the whole fucking time dicking around with "oh so WOMEN can't do this?!" and "is it because I'm black or because I'm a woman" writing>movie ends with them literally shooting the final boss in the dick
It'd be like if the original Ghostbusters had spent the final scene going "WOW YOU GUYS I FIGURED IT OUT, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WOMEN HATE?"
"COMMITMENT?!">LOL AM I RIGHT GUYS
"LOL NO, THEY HATE GETTING HIT IN THE TITS!"
"YEAH LET'S SHOOT GOZER IN THE TITS"
"YEAH SHOOT HER IN THE TITS, CHICKS HATE THAT"
And then the movie ended.
This movie fucking sucked.
>>72022156
>HOW DO YOU KNIW MORE WOMEN CANT BR CONSTRUCIIN WORKERS HAVE YIU EVER TRIED TO GIVR MORE GIRLS CONSTRUCTION JOBS? HERES SOME STATS THAT SHOW ONLY 4% OF WLMEN HAVE WORKED CONSTRUCTION JOBS FOR THE PAST 2000 YEARS, MAYBE IF THERE WAS EWUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTEUCTION WORKERS YOUD SEE THAT WOMEN CAN CONSTRUCT ANTTHUNG THAT A MAN CAN WHAG YOU NEED TO LIFT WEIGHTS TO READ BLUE PRUNTS AND TURN A STEERING WHEEL?
>>72022273
>can't win argument
>resorts to meme caps
>>72022156
If women were being oppressed from making these money making contributions you cant hold the belief they are also diversifying and making cuck films not because of a gender but because the industry is looking to make the most money.
Either you agree there is a agenda behind the industry regardless of the money lost (only in your head you think its misogyny and not progressivism being pushed) or you accept that these ideas women are coming up with simply are not going to make them money therefore not made.
do they want to make the most money they can and If so why not pick these great female stories and if not then it proves the social agenda we have been citing in the industry exists.
>>72016877
3.4?
That's what they consider solid?
>>72022187
Again what does representation have to do with fair judgment. Do we need equal amount of women in construction to KNOW FOR A FACT they are not as suited for it?
>>72022452
not because of a agenda*
>>72022452
studios want to make money and because men have made them money up to this point they only want to hire men. Women aren't given the opportunity because they're still an untested market studios can't engineer hits towards.
That's what equality calls for: testing of the market through diversifying studio output, thereby finding the good female actors, the good female directors.
The fact that it's not happening and studios see men as the main moneybringers is a form of inequality.
Women make up 50% of the world. If you don't serve that 50%, don't include 50% in the creative process (directors + actors) -- that's a problem indicative of an industry that doesn't think they exist.
People like you aren't helping tbqh
>>72020331
what am i looking at here?
>>72022556
because if women are unfairly judged as unimportant compared to male counterparts in a CREATIVE field that doesn't depend on bodystrength like construction (or the military for that matter), that's stupid and based on traditional bias rather than how the world actually works.
>>72016446
kek
>>72022661
wew lad you blew that one
you keep relying on a bias agenda in the movie industry the same one releasing cuck films that make them no money and lose them money and say there is a bias against specifically women lol
again see>>72022556
You are again taking the biological differences between and picking and choosing them as if they have been defined to stop right up until its time to make movies lol
you don't need equal amount of attempts to see trends that one is less capable than the other
your not living in reality but pre conceived victimhood.
>>72022817
>>72022817
>you don't need equal amount of attempts to see trends that one is less capable than the other
and that's how I know you never passed 8th grade. You don't even have a basic concept of scientific logic.
>>72021508
Lmao Gina Davis. Go powder your clam you cowardly, pathetic, quivering queef.
>>72022817
you're probably a functional retard so I'll just say this once more. inequality is opportunity, not biology. And humor has nothing to do with biology.
>>72022902
lmao good comeback with 0 facts and 0 experience. Makes sense that you're the flagbearer of nonsense bigotry.
>>72022982
Gina Davis turned down sex from the Jack Nicholson. Obviously she has a screw loose, numbnuts.
When my girl gets too uppity I found that once she does some deep cleaning in the kitchen it calms her down and she doesn't speak as much.
>>72022682
A flop.
>>72023061
All I got from this post is that you live in a 1950s stereotype and desperately want to fuck Jack Nicholson.
>>72023096
>Not wanting to fuck Jack Nicholson
Grow up!
>>72019754
>>72022273
There is indeed a push for more women in construction jobs. "Feminists only care about gender representation among scientists and CEOs while completely ignoring all blue collar jobs" is a myth.
Two things:
>women can be funny but they often aren't because they refuse to play their characters straight and hate being the butt of jokes
>no one will even remember this movie in two years. It will be the robocop remake.
>>72023311
they remade robocop?
>>72023311
>the Robocop remake
Haha, holy shit, I actually had legit forgotten they did that.
>>72016877
> """"""""""""""""""""SOLID""""""""""""""""""""
>>72019039
>less than 60%
>"Certified Fresh"
What the fuck?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNKZ9ycIdlY
SHOES!!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>72019569
>bunkbed
>>72023355
>>72023360
I was so goddamned mad when it came out, ignored all the press and totally forgot about it until yesterday when I saw it for 2 bucks at Walmart. SJWs don't spend money, I have no idea why people target that demographic. They just pretend to be interested in things then immediately forget about it when they're proven wrong, or right, they're just attention whores.
>>72023360
I'm still not sure I didn't dream up the announcement. Does the movie actually exist in finished state?
>>72023651
Unfortunately, yeah, it released with a reception that can only be described as "tepid notice." We've been working really hard to fix this awful timeline but Hollywood keeps fucking everything up.
>>72019532
You fags haven't been here long enough if you think other shit flicks are spared. Pack up your political agenda and get out.
>>72019886
Captain Tumblr
>>72019886
faggot cuck
>>72016446
They're not know. You have pigs like Amy Schumer doing stand up which is terrible.
Then you have the women in this movie who are not funny in it at all, it's cringey and embarrasing.
So literally what do they mean by this?
>>72017262
or something
>>72019886
that little boy on YouTube who makes videos raging against 4chan
>>72020246
you just know half of them will think they are in some Woman Army now that the official ShitBusters account has tweeted @ them even though it's a bot system.
>>72016446
>Shillary is elected
>sjws and other useful idiots like this are legitimized
>the country I legally immigrated and assimilated to will essentially die
This sucks, I don't want to go back to a socialist shithole
>>72020246
Kek. Their Twitter is just sad.
https://twitter.com/Ghostbusters/status/753605071288487937
>>72019781
That's going to be all the people who wanted to see the movie when it released because they pre-ordered tickets.
Sure you'll get the normal people who buy them. But don't expect this film to make over $30 million. Plus secret lives of pets will take the top spot.
>>72019923
underrated post
