Would you watch it if I take a shark attack movie and replace the shark with a tuna or a Marlin?
Is shark more charismatic or photogenic than other fishes?
>image.jpg
Orca was Jaws with a killer whale and it was alright. Pretty funny, actually.
>>72008015
>>72008084
Orcas are notoriously hard to work with. Most sharks act for peanuts and aren't unionized like marlins.
>>72008015
Minus the aesthetic, it's more horrifying being swallowed whole and crunched up by a maneater than being bitten or caused to drown by a slightly larger than normal fish and eaten
>>72008015
you mean like The Old man and the sea?
>>72008385
Weren't the sharks eating the old man's marlin as he rowed back to shore?
>>72008015
The movie Jaws established sharks as an amazing creature. Besides the attack scenes it provided quirky behavioral patterns of sharks through the character of Dreyfus and established it as an interesting character
Tuna on the other hand, is not interesting.
>>72008084
op here
I would like to exclude whales and orca from this as people do watch stories about whale attacks
>>72008015
holy shit, i just used this example to describe the new Ghostbusters movie to my friend earlier.
It's like remaking Jaws but with a dolphin instead
>>72008643
I actually thought about remaking jaws with dolphins. But then I decided that it has no values other than playing on the idea that dolphin is supposed to be cute.
A dolphin horror should be more like a thriller: it cannot have Jaws' plot. It should make dolphins deceiving, deductive and sexy
No I am not talking about GB remake
