this shit makes me laugh
>movie for girls
>they rate it higher
How does this make any sense?
>>71973455
None of it is accurate because both groups voted with an agenda
>>71973455
>females = SJW
>chick flick = SJW
You have a mental disorder. Seek help.
Post ratings and guess the film
>>71973486
Then they should cancel each other out.
>>71973455
i'm seeing a lot of butthurt female anglos in those votes OP
>>71973521
50 shades of gray?
>>71973602
in what world is 50 shades of grey rated 7.7?
>>71973602
Nah. 50 Shades has far more votes and almost universally low scores from the men while much lower scores than that from most women IIRC. The only group that really liked it is the IMDB Staff for some reason.
>>71973525
>1400 should cancel out 7500
Nope
>>71973521
/thread
>>71973455
So it's a retarded chick flick comedy.
And it probably sells only to childless single women so it can't even tap to the family market.
Who the fuck though it was a good idea spending 150 million on this?
>>71973521
This is a hard one. Loved by women, hated by old men and under 18s aren't interested at all. That rules out capeshit. I just don't know
>>71973642
Also banned in China.
>>71973521
Maybe hunger games but you'd think there'd be more under 18 votes
>>71973486
>men near the average
>women double the average
>>71973496
T -male feminist, BLM supporter and proud stepfather of three
>>71973496
How many copies of this image do you have saved?
>>71973521
The Color of Pomegranates (1969)
>>71973824
you've got it. holy shit that was random af
>>71973824
yep. how did you know?
>>71973824
the fuck?
Well the RT score is around 70-80 and that's what female viewers are giving it.
So doesn't this mean that it's us who are making the objective judgement while it's the men who are being unfairly critical?
something to think about...
>>71973521
So what is it?
Force awakens?
>>71973455
Bunch of alt-left woman-babies and Rodham supporters living in the past, don't they realize it's 2016 I mean come on
>>71973875
Le Samouraï (1967)
>>71974009
are you jesus?
>>71974022
Not really, all the information I need to find the film is in the screenshot.
>>71974049
then you're an imdb god
>>71973521
Titanic
>>71973723
The average is between men and women you dummy. Look at the numbers on the graph, There are like 5 times as many men voting as women so of course the total average will be closer to the men's average
>>71973723
6000 more men voted because of raiding. The movie looks awful and there was no reason for the all female cast but the way manchildren reacted is fucking embarrassing. Should've just let it fail
New one
>>71974172
>>71974249
Guess how I know that your reddit niggers?
>71974172
Guess how I know you're a retarded underage virgin?
>>71974116
He probably checks by total votes. Few would have the same total, it'd be easy to find out from there
>>71973455
Whats so funny? This just as much proves guys are upset about the movie having female leads, with woman just voting rationally.
>>71974494
Or it could prove that males vote rationally while women favor a bad movie having female leads.
>>71974566
The point being OP doesnt prove shit with his post.
