why do cunts vote like this, /tv/?
>>71956926
small brains and no respect for the arts beyond immediate gratification and social worth
>>71956926
More importantly, why does anyone give a shit about IMDB ratings? They're completely arbitrary. 25% of the bottom 100 are Bollywood films made in the last year or two.
They don't like it. They like what it represents. They aren't actually going to go see it though.
>>71956926
Why do retards care about IMDb scores? The only explanation I can think of is that retards care a lot about what fellow retards think?
>>71956975
Why are plebs pretending to care about film criticism now?
For years you iqlets called Brody and White pretentious and anyone that agreed with them hipsters. Has your taste film improved now or are you still the tasteless drones you were when you cried hipster and that fun should be allowed since film is supposed to be """entertainment"""
or is this another excuse to shitpost and stay away from developing better taste again?
>>71957333
And all the men giving it a 1 have watched it and are rating it on the merits of the movie surely
>>71957483
internet is mainstream and it pops up on their news feed.
>>71957483
/tv/ is full of plebs and they've cared about film criticism for years.
>>71956926
>There are at least 165 smart women out there
Nice.
Asking why women vote that way only makes sense if men didn't do the same. Men actually did it far worse. Why is everyone on /pol/ so retarded?
>>71957671
>muh /pol/
lol
>>71957483
nice strawman
>>71957029
>25% of the bottom 100 are Bollywood films made in the last year or two.
That's because Bollywood films are absolute shit. 3 hours of cringe dancing and crying
>Men who cry the most about women are the men who act the most like women, or more accurately an extreme stereotype of women
>These same men will call you betacucknumaleliberal
>/pol/tards act exactly the same way as SJWs, conflating their feelings with reality
>>71957483
Impressionable, reactionary plebs without foresight.
>>71958298
Based on percentages, your pic debunks your thesis.
Also, the movie is closer to a 1 than a 10, so it's much worse to give it a 10 out of spite than to give it a 1 out of spite.
>>71958298
>she's still here
>she's still this mad
Your butthurt, it's transcendent.
>>71958367
>this logic
It doesn't matter if the movie is closer to a 1 than a 10 (although the main review aggregate rates it at a 6+), what matters is the logic that goes into rating it a 1 or a 10.
>your pic debunks your thesis
~8% more women than men voted at a 1 or 10. Not exactly a significant difference, especially since there are far more men who voted. Any difference in percentage is countered by the fact that 5 times as many men cared to vote in the first place.
>>71958535
Sounds like a logic gap is real after all.
Why are men so much smarter than women? Or right, men cluster at IQ extremes.
