So whats the consensus /tv/, was this movie decent or no?
>>71911457
Not a good movie.
>>71911457
It's pretty forgettable. Not nearly worth the attention it's been getting.
>>71912193
>hundred threads a day about this movie on /tv/ all whining about the cast
>b-b-b-b-but it doesn't deserve the attention stop talking about it!
Full fucking damage control from the MRAs
>>71911457
It will be praised when the extended kino edition comes out
Pure anti film kino
you have to have a high cineIQ to understand why the left was blown out by this
ITS YELLOW NOW
THE PRAYER CIRCLE IS WORKING
>>71912318
Top Critics on RT score just went from 64% to 70%
BTFO
>>71912318
Will the /v/ teens that infected this board finally acknowledge that Boyhood and Mad Max Fury Road are the best films of this decade now??
>>71912404
>Mad Max Fury Road
a very mediocre 5/10 film
>Boyhood
8/10 very good
>>71912355
nope
>>71912404
boyhood and Mad Max are great films.
>>71912449
>a very mediocre 5/10 film
Top critics and meta critic say otherwise
>>71912355
Trusting the liberal shills and complete cucks on RT LOL.
Critics are destroying it.
http://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/ghostbusters-reboot-a-horrifying-mess/
>>71912404
Mad Max was always good, it was just underage faggots who didn't understand that Max movies are always about someone else's story. Only the first was actually about Max.
>>71912449
>a very mediocre film
L M A O
M
A
O
F A G G O T
A
G
G
O
T
>>71912576
>underaged
you mean contrarians?
From everything I've read, it's not horrible, but very forgettable.
It's a typical summer comedy with low-brow humor and a ho-hum script.
In other words, this movie will be forgotten in a month. The drama surrounding the movie had more entertainment than the movie itself.
>>71912461
What type of troll are you who posts an old picture wishing it was that rating?
This is the true rating. I am sorry you wish that it wasn't but it is.
>i shill for reddit82 is now praising boyhood
This is hilarious
>>71912623
>what are top critics
>>71912690
haha nice try bud
>>71912730
Holy fuck
How will pissing men babbies that have cartoon characters as their steam and twitter profile pics recover?
>>71912762
By calling all critics who like it "paid by Sony"
>>71912623
>>71912730
click top critics
>>71913179
I did and the score is 70%
How much bait do you take?
>>71913371
It's 50%
>>71912552
>roeper
HAHAHA
/lit/ was right about whats happened to this board
i dont know because im not paying to see this drivel and no one on /tv/ should either
>>71913455
It's 74
Try checking.
It's a good movie but redditors on /tv/ will deny it
>>71912355
>(((TOP CRITICS)))
>>71911457
The body of the second girl from the left actually pisses me off like what the fuck is going on there.
>>71911457
It's an ok, forgettable movie. Dead on remake movie tier. The women didn't make it better or worse, it would've been the same with a male cast.
Are you people finally going to stop being afraid of women?
>>71913576
You can keep posting that out of date score or look at the website
74% Top Critics
14 Fresh
5 Rotten
>>71913576
Yikes
>>71912244
heh, 15 minutes of the jokes that were too bad for the theatrical release? Maybe an extra long cock shot battle? More of that nigger acting like a stereotype?
>>71913671
You're literally wrong.
Ghostbusters(2016) - Rotten Tomatoes
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/
>>71913718
>reviews for movies made before the Internet became popular
how stupid are u
>>71913885
I've LITERALLY GONE TO THE LITERAL SITE
I'VE ALREADY POSTED THE FACTS >>71913671
DENIAL LIKE THIS MAKES ME AGREE WITH THE SJW CROWD CALLING YOU BABY MEN
>>71913949
>rotten tomato existed before the internet
how stupid are you?
>almost every early reviewer is a known SJW cuck
>>71911457
So far, one half of my prediction's come true so far.
>Critical darling, at least with the left and the liberal reviewers
The other half of my prophecy will come true over the weekend.
>It'll flop, and then we'll have a flood of articles and interviews how it was muh soggy knee that made it do so.
>>71914013
Anon, it's time to stop posting.
>>71914027
I never said that. I said Rotten Tomatoes reviews for movies before 1990 arent accurate.
Isnt it out in England now? Why are there no user reviews yet?
>>71914124
>RT reviews before the internet dont count
>I NEVER SAID THE INTERNET DIDNT EXIST
jesus christ you are retarded
>>71914107
Fuck you.
You think I WANT it to be 74 by top critics?
>>71914013
fuck man, you are trolling? Hit "Top Critics"
>>71911457
>tfw Sony pays me $29.65 per post for calling out butthurt fat virgins who have nothing better to be upset about
>tfw getting payed to tell the truth
Feels good, mayne.
>>71914198
I'm not trolling.
I did hit top critics.
>>71914090
>muh liberal conspiracy
Many people on the left, although your definition of left is probably fucked to all hell, have dimissed it as forgettable, shat on Hemsworth and said the cameos were dumb.
If you'd actually read them, rather than reading about them on your manchild echo-chambers you'd know this.
>>71914181
never reply to me ever again.
>>71914241
It's 77 for ALL
74 for TOP
>>71914240
Can I get in on this? I'd just post screencaps from Atheist youtube channels and /r/movies all day.
>>71914241
Okay you are just trolling then, I know you cant even see it now because "Tomatometer Not Available..."
Not bad enough to be worth seeing how fucked up it is, not good enough to warrant extra viewing. Its a remake I dont see being anything other than a footnote in future, where people say "there was a Ghostbuster remake?".
>>71914382
You lie all you want pal.
When your movie sucks...and it don't look good...
Who you gonna call? The Att-orneys!
Chapter 11...hangin' over yo heads...
What you gonna file? BANKRUPTCY!
Doo-doo-doo-doo-doo-doo-doo...
>Guys lets all shitpost on the Anita's kickstarter video. That'll stop her series from getting made! No way this could backfire.
>Guys let's all downvote every piece of Ghostbusters media and argue with fat teen girls on the internet. Surely this will make the average person not want to see the kino.
Bravo fat whiteboiis, you did it again.
>people saying that the movie is good because reviews have been positive
Out of all the reviews I've read, I came to 3 general consensus:
>reviews that focused on the leads gave a positive review
>reviews that focused on the nostalgia or comparison to the original movie gave it a mediocre review
>reviews that tried to stay neutral gave it an okay to mediocre review (ie IGN)
>>71914476
what an absolute virgin.
>>71914476
YOU HAVE TO GO BACK
So, whos seeing this shit?
I hate this movie, not because it's bad, but because of the shitstorm around it. Both sides have become annoying and insufferable. One side accusing positive reviews of being shills, the other side discrediting a negative review simply because he reviewed it in a fucking car and not acknowledging that even positive reviews mention that the film has mediocre elements and that they are being lenient because they like the cast. I hope this film ends up just being mediocre, both sides shut the fuck up and forget about it after a month.
>>71914313
dude just hit top critics it's not that hard
>>71915945
>See: Every debate about everything in every platform for the last 3-5 years
Western society is eating itself from the inside
>>71915840
>Chief Film Critic
Kek. Does anyone actually take "critics" seriously? They're basically any other faggot that blogs their opinion, except they get paid for it.
>Busting does in fact, feel good.
>>71912237
You seem to be way more invested in this topic than that other anon.
Calm down, it is just another shitty comedy.
>>71916663
Good goy, take that bait
>>71911457
it's typical pleb trash infused with what Hollywood thinks Tumblr and Twitter wants to see.
So yeah it's 'meh' with a crusty dried tampon on top. When you consider it's a reboot of a film with one of our most beloved comedic actors then it's an atrocity.
>>71914165
Because no one has seen it.
